Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Not That Open?

mstansberry writes "At the Open Source Business Conference last week, Microsoft's Shared Source mouthpiece Jason Matusow argued the point that open source isn't really open. He said you can't just go changing code on supported Linux offerings without paying extra to companies like Red Hat or Novell. So as Linux is commercialized, it becomes less open. While Matusow made good points during his presentation, many in the open source community are skeptical of the idea at best."

4 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. It all depends... by OSS_ilation · · Score: 5, Funny

    on what your definition of "open" is. Same defense, different Bill.

  2. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    An objective evaluation from the leader in open source.

    Come on... Microsoft!??!

  3. in other news by jzeejunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft software isn't all that closed. There are always open holes to exploit.

    --
    sarchasm
  4. Air is not free by truckaxle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientist just discovered that air is not completely free! Researchers at Phillips Morris institute have completed a study that calculates the number of millicalories required for each breath of fresh air. This study is demonstrates that the air you breath is not entirely free but requires expenditure of energy and coordination of dozens of different muscles. This study is being release just prior to the companies announcement of a new product that uses a rechargable battery operated turbo-enhanced tobacco injection system.