Slashdot Mirror


Venus Express Blasts Off

kitzilla writes "The European Space Agency's Venus Express probe has been successfully launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. The mission's first attempt was scrubbed last month after technicians spotted a problem with the lift vehicle. In about five months, Venus Express will pull into orbit around our closest planetary neighbor and begin five months of scheduled observations. On the short list of mission objectives: a detailed mapping of Venus' surface, a survey of the planet's complex atmosphere, and a look into the possibility of active Venusian volcanoes."

36 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. For contrast by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:For contrast by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a Video of the launch on the BBC

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  2. hmm by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And this just after news about how the US is cutting down on NASA's budget and missions like this..

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    1. Re:hmm by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And this just after news about how the US is cutting down on NASA's budget and missions like this..

      The US federal government cut NASA's budget? Do you have a link for this? The only articles I've seen indicate an increase in NASA's budget, virtually one of the only non-defense sectors of the government to see an increase.

  3. Cool - Does that mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Google Venus is on the way ??? :-)

    1. Re:Cool - Does that mean... by ronsta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sometimes i wonder if there will ever be a slashdot thread without at least one google comment :)

  4. Watch the launch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    37 megs, quicktime movie.

    The ESA's Venus express portal

    And a load of artist impressions, photos and cgi videos are on ESA's site here

    A great day for the ESA, the data gathered from this and in comparison to that from the Mars Express is really going to give some good information on planetary warming and cooling.

  5. Planetary Society weblog by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Emily Lakdawalla of the Planetary Society is keeping a running tally of events on the Society's official weblog. In general, the weblog is a great source of space science news. According to her latest post, Venus Express has already reported back to ground control and is in healthy condition.

    There's also the obligatory Wikipedia article on Venus Express, which has a nice description of what the craft will be doing.

  6. How come... by squoozer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    we can get Government funded missions to map and photograph other planets that place the results in the public domain but we can't get Government funded missions to map and photograph our own planet which put the results in the public domain? It occurs to me that the latter would not only be substantially cheaper to do but also far more useful to the general populous. A multi-national effort to provide such mapping would cost each country peanuts and would provide numerous benifits.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:How come... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      we can't get Government funded missions to map and photograph our own planet which put the results in the public domain? It occurs to me that the latter would not only be substantially cheaper to do but also far more useful to the general populous.

      The difference here is that there's little commercial use for a high-resolution map of Mars or Venus. Accurate maps of Earth are extremely economically valuable.

      However, although it's not public domain, Google Earth is freely as in gratis.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:How come... by DeathByDuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      but wed see the secret death star construction site. thats why they wont.

  7. Additionally by KitesWorld · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4420210.stm - the BBC has both a report and a video (streaming).

  8. Re:What's the use... by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, absolutely. Who cares ....

    In fact let's ban all forms of research ...

    In fact let's ban all forms of thought. And art, and music, oh, and teaching any form of science - especially that evilolution stuff.

    Let's ban ..... bzzt .. sorry this Kansas Educational broadcast has been interrupted by the real world.

    Research doesn't always give directly useful results. It might - or it might not. The process of doing research might give useful results - or it might not.
    In fact doing almost anything might give useful results. Or not.

    But backing off from researching the local area - now that's really silly. Volcanoes on Venus - who cares? Well I do, for one. Any better understanding of volcanoes would seem to be a useful thing to me - there are quite a few in the world. It would be nice to learn something about them in a completely different environment. ... bzzt, back to the Kansas educational department broadcast ...

    Yes, and let's ban the Internet, and electricity, and inoculations, and .....

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  9. Re:What's the use... by teewurstmann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My goodness, I was seriously asking what the use is. I was not asking "Why is such a useless thing being done?", I was asking what the use is. And that's what I'd like to honestly know. Of course I know that not all research is useful right away, but there must be some motivation behind finding out about volcanoes on Venus.

  10. Three cheers for science! by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not a NASA fan. I see the ISS as not doing much science, recent Mars "search for signs of life" missions as a combination PR stunt and the space equivalent of the drunk looking for his keys under the lamppost because that's where it's light. And abandoning Hubble? Don't even get me started.

    So it's great to see a space mission that combines engineering with real science and that isn't just predicated on the public's gullibility as to the long odds of ET life.

    I know that the /. 'love all things space' crowd will mod me down, but I've got Karma to burn.

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
    1. Re:Three cheers for science! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I see ... recent Mars "search for signs of life" missions as a combination PR stunt and the space equivalent of the drunk looking for his keys under the lamppost because that's where it's light

      I think that's a little unfair. We know for a fact that Earth is completely infested with life. Everywhere on Earth that life could imaginably exist, it is found, and also in some places where we never imagined we would find it at all. Deep underground in solid rock, in the furthest Antarctic, in the driest deserts, in the irradiated high atmosphere, at volcanic vents in the ocean completely independent from the sun... Everywhere. We also know that Earth life can survive in spore form in space; bacteria survived for years on the Surveyor moon probe until returned by Apollo. In recent years, what we've discovered about the ability of life to adapt to hellish conditions has been absolutely amazing.

      So it's not so unreasonable to look for life on Mars. It's not that far-fetched. Other places that might be worth checking are the upper atmosphere of Venus (where it's cooler) and the oceans of Europa. Whether native life or Earth life spread by impacts, it's not unrealistic to suppose it might be there and, if found, it would be a huge discovery.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Three cheers for science! by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, we might in fact find our own bacteria there, adapted to the conditions.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Three cheers for science! by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ironically, I agree with you in principle, but I think you're a little too harsh. Yes, NASA is practically a caricature of the classic "bloatware" of entrenched government monopoly. HOWEVER, let's make it absolutely clear:
      - ISS is the result of POLITICS, not NASA plans. NASA has gone along with the ISS (and shown proper enthusiasm for) the ISS for budgetary and political reasons, not because they are crusading for a vision of space exploration based on the ISS.
      - The constant carping about shutting down the Hubble is vexing. The simple economics of it is cost > benefit, especially with having to rely on the crappy shuttle as the tender for the ISS. Finite resources. Personally, I'd LOVE it if NASA got a bigger budget but that's outside the scope of this discussion.
      - NASA has recently done some STUNNING pure science. Mars rovers, anyone? Cassini? Mars Recon Orbiter? Deep Impact? Stardust? (ok, that kind of also became it's own "Deep Impact", but the pure science validation was there). And in the future? Dawn? New Horizons? Phoenix?

      C'mon - NASA is as worthy of criticism as any government agency but you're making it sound like the ESA is the only one trying to do science, which is just silly.

      BTW: big "grats" to the guys at ESA for the clean, solid launch. Best wishes on a safe and boring flight to Venus and a successful mission with oodles of data. GREAT JOB!

      --
      -Styopa
  11. Re:What's the use... by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the human race innately took your attitude, we'd still be living in caves.

  12. Re:What's the use... by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Informative
    ... of finding active volcanoes on Venus? Could someone get some practical use out of such a find?

    Venus is an extreme case of climatology. It's about the same size as the Earth. It actually receives less sunlight than the Earth, even though it's closer to the Sun, because its cloud layer reflects so much incoming radiation. But it's hot hot hot.

    That atmosphere is mostly carbon dioxide, with some nitrogen, water vapour and sulphur dioxide. It's hot, acidic, and the pressure is the sort of thing you only get on Earth in the deep seas.

    Now, we have to wonder how Venus got that way. One possibility for how Venus got such a thick, acidic atmosphere is that it is continually undergoing massive volcanic activity. If we can observe Venusian volcanoes, we can determine to what extent they might reasonably affect the climate on Venus.

    If we can understand Venus, then we can use it to stress-test our planetary climate models and thereby improve our understanding of comparable processes on Earth. It shouldn't be too hard to think of a reason why we might urgently want to improve our understanding of Earth's climate systems as regards atmospheric carbon dioxide content...

    There's a very good writeup of Venus and why it's interesting here.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  13. Re:Rockets to Venus? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Informative
    here the Europeans are showing off that they have a bigger rocket

    What rot. If that was the case we'd have used an Ariane. The rocket used here was Soyuz / Fregat - a Russian launcher.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  14. More space/esa news.. by slashmojo · · Score: 2, Informative
    You can also keep up to date on space/nasa/esa etc news here..

    http://space.boardtracker.com

  15. I have no doubt... by Biomechanical · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That there will be active volcanos on Venus, if only for the simple fact that it's apparently close enough to the Sun to be "as hot as hell", but not quite close enough to be baked to a cinder like Mercury, plus there was some interesting things observed when we last sent a probe - even with lens-cap problem.

    teewurstmann does raise an interesting question - "Why are we looking for active volcanos on Venus?"

    The answers "Because we can." or "It'll lead to great jumps in science." would not suffice with your average Joe Bloggs though, and if we wish to increase our ventures into space, or even just continue with space exploration altogether, then we're going to need a "hook", or a goal that we can present to the public in a unified answer that satisfies their curiosity and is not an outright lie - although a little white lie like, for example "We hope to discover a significant mineral deposit on the moon which will facilitate longer journeys into space." or "By studying the metals and minerals on Mercury we can discover how to create stronger, more tolerable materials on Earth which will create better housing, stronger and lighter cars..." etc.

    Come up with a Grand Idea if you like - "We're going to save mankind."

    Now seriously, who wouldn't think that saving our species is a noble goal? We don't have to tell the public "from ourselves", we'll just keep'em guessing - the continual doses of paranoia we're getting from our governments aren't doing too much harm, so we'll use a little "poetic licence".

    Why are we looking for volcanos on Venus? Why not? Why not start at Mercury, or Venus, or Mars, or anywhere else in our solar system and look at it like one of those colour tests a few of us must have done in chemistry in high school.

    Oh look, Mercury is mainly this colour, which means it's made mostly of this mineral... Venus is very acidic, and has all sorts of interesting liquid metals at venusian "room" temperature... Mars seems to have water, or the evidence of water...

    We study, and learn, and find out how our solar system is constructed, and then one day, maybe if we don't destroy ourselves beforehand, we use the models we've made from this gathering of knowledge and we create plans.

    We plan which solar systems nearby would be likely to have a sufficiently earth-like blue-green planet. We plan where we could find in our galaxy various minerals, fuels, and other resources needed to build, maintain, and power our ships as we go searching for other life, and other worlds. We plan to spread out, to colonise the most idyllic locations, and make sure that our species survives through sheer weight of numbers. We plan to live, to explore, to discover, to learn, to expand our minds and evolve.

    We've been sitting on this little blue-green marble for a long time now, long enough to nurture the maths, physics, chemistry, and biological sciences enough to show us how to get up and explore the rest of our solar system. Now we need to use that knowledge and help ourselves before a meteor, asteroid, or sheer stupidity kills us.

    Why explore the solar system? Why pick over rocks on Venus?

    Because these are our baby steps, our first tentative journeys into space, the beginning of what I, and I'd hope many of you too, would dearly wish to be the start of our much greater journey into the galaxy.

    Mistakes will be made, and lives will, as they have, be lost, but those people, our first space explorers, did not die in vain. We already have gained much knowledge, and it may not be used to any large extent now, but it will prove to be invaluable in the future.

    I only hope that politics, greed, apathy, and stupidity don't condemn us to live our final days here, stuck on a world we could so easily leave if we simply worked at it.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
    1. Re:I have no doubt... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why are we looking for volcanos on Venus?

      Because we like to look for potential habitats for life elsewhere in the solar system. And a volcanic vent could easily be the coolest and most hospitable location on the surface of Venus, particularly if the volcano is venting some water.

  16. Re:New Orleans... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful
    > ...How can it take a nation that can fly to the moon and to Venus days and ...

    What??? What???
    From TFA: "The European Space Agency's Venus Express probe..."

    The "nation that flew to the moon" was the U.S. of the 1960s - the one that invented stuff, the one that manufactured stuff, the one that didn't care about "self-esteem", the one that wasn't morbidly obsessed with not offending anyone, the one that dared, the one whose future was still before it.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  17. Re:What's the use... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... of finding active volcanoes on Venus? Could someone get some practical use out of such a find?

    Well, the US takes Mars, Europe takes Venus, and the taxable populations get it in the Uranus.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  18. Re:What's the use... by heikkile · · Score: 2, Informative
    I was seriously asking what the use is

    We only have a limited number of volcanoes on earth, and only of limited variety in type and structure. Seeing a few more of them, maybe of types we haven't seen here, might give us better insight on how such things work. Long time down the road, we might even get better in controlling, or at least predicting the behavior of the local ones.

    Besides, active volcanoes indicate a planet has an active hot core, which would be interesting to know. Same argument as above, just substitute "planet" for "volcano"...

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

  19. Politics, power, and money my naive friend by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Politics, my naive but well meaning friend. No country wants pictures of its top secret places free for the world to see. Look at the whole google-spotting fun going on already with people posting up pics of bomber bases, submarines, warships etc. Lots of countries really don't want you to know where they keep their tanks, or that they've sneakily pushed up their advanced forces into somebody else's disputed territory.

    Lots of farmers in Europe got caught out a few years ago when the satellite images proved that they were claiming subsidies for farming land they weren't actually doing anything with, lots of logging companies in the Amazon probably would prefer that hippy ecologist PhD students don't get ready access to high quality data. Pick your prefered flavour of scenario.

    Some countries find it good not to let others know what they are doing with nuclear power. Commercial companies are doing very nicely making money out of selling you pictures, why should they want you to get them for free?

    Right now, geographical and geological data about Mars and Venus are of commercial / geopolitical little worth, we can just about get remote control robots there. Wait till any medium sized company and tin pot dictatorship can get 50 people there with mining/digging/ fighting equipment and then it will be interesting to see how easy it is to get high resolution maps "of the land 10km to the East of US Mars Base 7" "geological survey of 100km surrounding Exxon drilling rig 39" etc....

  20. Outlast by Barkley44 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wonder if it will outlast it's planned life, like the mars rover.

    --
    KeepTrackOfIt.com - Find the lowest gas prices in your area graphically
  21. Deja Vu by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess as long as they're not planning to have the satellite return to Earth, it's all good. Remember, this is how Night of the Living Dead all started.

    --

    Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

  22. The real reason for the Venus Express... by aggressor-on · · Score: 5, Funny

    Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus... Its just an excuse to check out some hot Women!

  23. In comparison by amightywind · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  24. Re:Rockets to Venus? by oliderid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Arianespace has signed a deal with Russia to include their soyuz rocket into their products range. I'm not an expert but it makes sense to use it for such mission, Ariane5 is mainly dedicated to commercial satellites.

    I'm maybe wrong but I think soon Soyuz rockets will be launched from French guinea.

    This is a small part of a European/Russian biggest plan to develop more and more solutions together.

  25. Re:Rockets to Venus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What rot. If that was the case we'd have used an Ariane. The rocket used here was Soyuz / Fregat - a Russian launcher.

    The latest Soyuz is a joint venture owned by Russia and Europe, though the design is Russian origin. It's pretty much the most advanced spacecraft ever built on Earth, solid and reliable, and costs only $30 million per launch. (compare to the ancient shuttle costing over $600 million per launch)

    Nice to see Europeans continue their agenda to do actual science which benefits the entire human civilization instead of burning money for ridiculous political/self-esteem/military goals.

    Good luck, Venus Express!

  26. Re:It's not venusian by geobeck · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it's cytherian.

    Mercury - mercurian
    Venus - cytherian (or venerean)
    Earth - terran
    Mars - martian
    Jupiter - jovian
    Saturn - saturnian
    Uranus - uranian
    Neptune - neptunian
    Pluto - "Here, boy!"

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  27. Re:It's not venusian by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Arthur C. Clarke, in a footnote his 1968 book "The Conquest of Space," said venusian sounded good but was wrong, venerian raised false hopes, and cytherian was correct but only classics scholars knew what it meant.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton