Slashdot Mirror
Anti-Gravity Device Patented
October_30th writes "According to the United States Patent Office website, Boris Volfson has recently patented a "Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state", which is essentially an anti-gravity propulsion device." The validity of this patent remains to be seen, but the general consensus of the physics community seems to be that it is complete malarky.
/me rushes off to get patent for inertial dampening
If it's "complete malarky" then nobody has anything to worry about, but if the guy were to actually make something out of this then doesn't he deserve the patent?
This should probably have been put in the "Funny" category, if anything.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
If an infinite improbability drive were possible, wouldn't it have already brought itself into existence?
Play Command HQ online
If you read the patent text he's basically describing the warp drive from star trek.
"whereby providing for the gravitational imbalance such that the lowered pressure of inflationary vacuum state is pulling said space vehicle forward in modified spacetime."
interesting i guess.
in normal fashion both slashdot and the reporting news outlet have got it all wrong. it's not a perpetual motion machine - becuase it requires input of a nuclear reactor to make it "go". It's no more a perpetual motion machine than a space probe launched from earth.
nor is this "anti gravity". the patent describes a device that will "modify" space time such that an area of "low pressure vacuum" and "high pressure vacuum" are created. the low pressure area is infront of the ship and the high pressure is behind the ship. the ship travels forward because it's caught in the middle. i guess.
not a physics major.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
sig fault
We all know that the only real anti-gravity device is a (Score:5, Insightful)
If some guy in Indiana wants to pay hundreds of dollars to patent stuff that (regardless of being real physics or not) can't possibly be implemented before the patent expires, I'm all for it. That means that if/when technology finally catches up it'll be public domain. He should go ahead and slip in a broad patent on near-light travel, and something about wormholes. To tell the truth, I feel the same way about gene patents. If they want to patent them all, let them. As many incredible advances as have been made in genetics, I somehow feel they'll be much more useful in twenty years. The goverment is too dumb to figure out what's obvious and what's not, so if we just patent [i]everything[/i] now and check back in twenty years, the problem will be solved.
Sendou Wave Kick!!
Yeah, governments are EVIL. Let's do away with them all. Because, if you look around the world, the best states are those with no governments, like in central Africa - the rule of the gun is so much better than civilization.
'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh
Since when is it good practice for any Patent Office to issue patents based on conjecture? There should be a valid working prototype before any patent is issued. Software patents are bad enough, but speculative patents are total b.s.
The approval of this patent (#6,960,975) is a testament to the stupidity of the USPTO, which certainly affects the rights of everyone. What's to stop someone from writing a program that strings words together in patent-application-ese and mass submitting them? Then find people who are violating your wonderful patent and sue them. Or just patent every single device ever seen or conceived of in Star Trek or other Sci Fi, and then sue as they become invented. Illustrating the stupidity (and absurdity) of the USPTO is definitely a rights-related topic.
rooooar
then I go back in time and convince them to open the patent office a day earlier ...
Stupid question: What's the use of an expired patent anyway ?
This is bad, because inventor was supposed to disclose the invention to obtain a patent and this implies using established terminology to describe it.
Allowing a patent with made up terms is equivalent to allowing wildcards "I patent a thing * that does * and is useful" - the owner of the patent can try to define these terms as legal opportunity presents itself.
The PTO does not require a working prototype because it does not want all the patents to belong to huge corporations. Pretend you create a nuclear fission reactor that's table-sized. (You're like the second coming of Albert Einstein or something.) If the PTO required a prototype, you would have to find someone with a lot of cash to build the prototype to submit to the PTO. The corporation might steal your idea and take the prototype to the PTO by itself.
So while this lack of a requirement looks ridiculous in this example, there may be other more realistic places where it has protected the small inventor.
A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
Make a (slowly) spinning disk of this "Gravitium", with holes in it, and spin it beneath an iron ball. Have the iron ball hang by a rope that goes over a wheel and connects to a spring on the other end. Connect the wheel into an electric generator, and have it feed the electric engine that spins the wheel.
Now, as the wheel spins, the gravity of the planet gets blocked (when there's Gravitium under the ball) and unblocked (when there's a hole under the ball). When it gets unblocked, the ball pulls down the rope, spinning the wheel and storing energy on the spring; when it gets blocked, the spring pulls the now-weightless ball back up, spinning the wheel in opposite direction (so you'd propably need some additional system to keep the electric output "clean", but that's not difficult to arrange - a mechanism similar to spring-powered hand watches will suffice just fine). The electricity produced by this should be more than enough to overcome any friction in the Gravitium wheel, and in fact there should be a surplus to feed to the electric grid.
Congratulations, you've just invented the missing piece of the Perpetual Motion Machine - or, since this thing actually produces an energy surplus, the very secrets of creation itself.
Or, to put it in other words, your idea won't work unless the first law of thermodynamics, the principle of Conservation of Energy, is untrue, and energy can actually be created from nothing.
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
Nope. Gravity propagating with infinite speed is violating relativity, because it allows to transmit information faster than light. In your example, scientists on Earth could notice that the planet moves differently before they see the Sun disappear. So, the information about disappearance of the Sun has travelled faster than light. In relativity no information can travel faster than light (or back in time), so if gravity is propagating faster than light, relativity must be wrong.
um, space/time squashes you to the planet. Contrary to all the wonderful depictions of masses indenting the flat fabric of space time, it's actually 3d. Picture a marble in a stream of water.