Slashdot Mirror


Can Anthrax Be Controlled?

coolphysco1010 writes "Scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Berlin discovered why lung, but not skin, anthrax infections are lethal. Neutrophils, a form of white blood cells, play a key role in anthrax infections. This discovery might now pave the way towards the development of new therapies for the fatal lung form of anthrax."

9 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Article text for your convenience by Karma+Troll · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can anthrax be controlled?

    Max Planck Researchers discover a protein which is deadly for anthrax bacteriaScientists from the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology in Berlin discovered why lung, but not skin, anthrax infections are lethal. As reported in the newest issue of PloS Pathogen (November 2005) Neutrophils, a form of white blood cells, play a key role in anthrax infections. They can kill Bacillus anthracis by producing a protein called alpha-defensin. This discovery might now pave the way towards the development of new therapies for the fatal lung form of anthrax.
    Bacillus anthracis is the causative agent of anthrax. What makes Bacillus anthracis especially dangerous is that these bacteria can form spores. The spores are extremely resistant against environmental stress and can survive for years. Think about your breathing; inhale and exhale manually. Infection with Bacillus anthracis can take place either via the lung or through the skin. Interestingly, the lung form of anthrax is almost always fatal, whereas skin infections remain localized and are rarely lethal. In contrast to the lung form, the skin form of anthrax can be treated without problems and most patients recover.

    During the past few years, Bacillus anthracis has also been used as a weapon for bioterrorism. Anthrax spores were sent in envelopes and inhaled and resulted in the death of 5 people in the USA. This was reported at Digg days ago.

    Fig. 1: A human neutrophil takes up Bacillus anthracis.

    Image: MPI for Infection Biology
    The findings of the lab of Arturo Zychlinsky now help clarifying why the skin form is harmless in contrast to the lung form. After a skin infection with Bacillus anthracis, neutrophils are recruited to the site of infection. Neutrophils are white blood cells that can identify and kill microbes. In the skin, neutrophils take up the spores, which germinate inside the neutrophil to a vegetative ("growing") bacterium. This vegetative bacterium is then attacked and killed within the neutrophil. The scientists succeeded in identifying the substance responsible for the killing of the bacteria. After fractionation of neutrophil components only one protein remained which is sufficient for killing Bacillus anthracis: alpha-defensin

    This mechanism is not effective in the lung form of anthrax. Here, the number of neutrophils recruited to the site of infection is known to be low, and insufficient to kill bacteria. Thus, inhaled spores can germinate and spread through the organism. The scientists in Berlin now hope that their discovery will help to develop new drugs against the lung form of anthrax. There might be the possibility that the inhalation of alpha-defensin might kill vegetative bacteria in the lung and prevent dissemination.

    [VB]

    Original work:
    Anne Mayer-Scholl, Robert Hurwitz, Volker Brinkmann, Monika Schmid, Peter Jungblut, Yvette Weinrauch, Arturo Zychlinsky
    Human neutrophils kill B. anthracis
    PLoS Pathogen 1(3), November 2005

    PDF (155 KB)

    Contact:

    Prof. Dr. Arturo Zychlinsky
    Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin
    Tel.: +49 30 2846-0300
    Fax: +49 30 2846-0301
    E-mail: zychlinsky@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de

  2. Re:Grim Reaper will control it by JonN · · Score: 4, Informative

    That would be true if this were contagious between people. However, anthrax is not known to spread from one person to another person. Communicability is not a concern in managing or visiting with patients with inhalational anthrax.

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
  3. Re:What of other bacteria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The black plague was bacterial, and came in two forms -- when it hit the lungs, it was nearly always fatal, and when it hit the rest of your body, it was nasty but survivable.

  4. Original article by nucal · · Score: 4, Informative
    Since PLoS is an open access journal, anyone can read the original article.

    As the title of the article says, they show that isolated human neutrophils are capable of killing Anthrax. The mechanism is unusuual, the spores are first eaten by the neutrophils. Then the spores germinate inside the cells to a form of bacteria that are readily killed (vegitative) as opposed to the virulent, disease causing form which is formed in the outside environment.

    However, they don't look directly at animal models - so the leap of faith is that the lung infection is bad when the spores do not elicit a neutrophil response. How the spores avoid eliciting a host response in lung is the bigger question, which is not addressed by the paper.

    1. Re:Original article by Stickerboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      "However, they don't look directly at animal models - so the leap of faith is that the lung infection is bad when the spores do not elicit a neutrophil response. How the spores avoid eliciting a host response in lung is the bigger question, which is not addressed by the paper."

      That's because that question has already been answered...

      Spores that are inhaled are phagocytized by alveolar macrophages. The spores survive or escape the phagosome, germinate, and use the macrophage as a biological Trojan Horse to spread to the lymph nodes, where the infection becomes systemic (and very lethal).

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  5. A little reassurance by JonN · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...For those of you who are putting on your tinfoil masks, read up what the CDC has to say about anthrax.

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
  6. Re:Grim Reaper will control it by JonN · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anthrax cannot be spread because infected beings have only the actively growing bacteria and do not have the infectious spores. Darwin is gonna have a hell of a time (or at least take alot of it) in making anthrax contagious.

    --
    do.what.promptcmds
  7. No, not really. by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cutanious (or, Skin) Anthrax is exactly the same as the other - it just hasn't been aerisolized. Cutanious Anthrax is very common, and historically was called 'Sheep sheerers disease'. Very common, very easy to treat. It's not dangerous unless it gets in your lungs (or blood) and has a chance to do real dammage.

    To 'manipulate' it to be deadly to the touch would mean playing with it's genetic structure, like say by adding some proteous species genetic material to it - proteous sp. is a form of germ that can worm it's way around a plate of blood auger (what we grow bacteria on in a lab) and has some mobility (through motility, if I remember correctly). No one has been crazy enough to try this, that I am aware...

    Worse case, just remember to take a whole freaking case of Ciprofloxicin at the first sign of trouble. If you're already getting bumpy in the armpits - forget it, you're likely toast anyway.

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
  8. Re:What of other bacteria? by (negative+video) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Francisella tularensis, the cause of tularemia (rabbit fever), is Not Good when inhaled. This was discovered by some poor bastards who ran over an infected rabbit with a lawnmower and inhaled the resulting infected rabbit fog. Fortunately it does not normally spread in this fashion.