Look at the PS2 - it greatly influenced the use of DVDs in the household. I know quite a few people who used their PS2 as a DVD player long before they got a specific DVD player. The PS2 was a great doorway for the DVD, as it was quite obvious the PS2 would sell and it brought DVD movies along with it.
It may not be the best thing to say, but I find that it will most likely be true when David Reeves, the SCEE CEO said: "We have built up a certain brand equity over time since the launch of PlayStation in 1995 and PS2 in 2000 that the first five million are going to buy it, whatever it is, even it didn't have games".
This is another example to the classic problem humans have with looking towards the future. I don't need to list more than a few examples such as our own garbage problem, pollution, and a teenager doing drugs that will ruin the rest of his life. Although it is true that it is sometimes hard to predict what will happen, aren't we at an age (including the last 50 years) where we can somewhat guesstimate an end result?
Currently, and since its conception, the world's space programs have been based on the model that we can just leave shit we don't need in space. Where were the great minds of NASA to say "Wait...what is going to happen with the rocket parts we are leaving out there." We already knew of gravity and orbits, so the idea that perhaps the stuff would just fly away doesn't seem plausible.
Us as a race, and us as the most influential countries, must look to the future, and I do see improvements, however many issues as well. We do not live in a one generation world, this is a place which we must sustain indefinately (until we find a new host planet of course).
Alright, so there is alot of crime in computers, even my young sister knows of all the viruses and what not floating around the internet. However is the U.S. and businesses in general responding in the proper way? Responding to worms, viruses and Trojan horses was most costly... Respondents spent nearly $12 million to deal with virus-type incidents, I think the issue is seen here, with the question of how these viruses and other spyware made it onto the business networks.
Perhaps the problem is that companies aren't putting enough money into their security and not enforcing strict enough protocol among their staff. How many viruses felt by businesses do you assume were caused by a stupid employee? This could take the form of lazy tech staff, or even the assistant downloading something to pass the time. Then there is also the fact that alot of smaller businesses I have experience with do not have an employee that can properly setup and maintain the businesses networks and desktops. How much money are these companies spending on techie staff to remove stuff that otherwise could be done by any teenager who has experience with computers.
The number is huge, however the issue behind it I feel is being avoided and unseen. Businesses need a better method of using computers, perhaps a more business friendly OS. From the article, "Some are very small businesses that should have that technology, but they don't," and this is the problem. We won't be able to stop people from trying to bring down software and networks, however businesses can become more competent on how to prevent and protect.
promptnews:"Strictly speaking Apple is not doing anything wrong. RSS is not an official standard governed by a standards body, and anybody can make changes and introduce new elements and extensions."
This is the part of the article that really killed the title of it. Apple is not cheating on the RSS standard, they are just changing it to suit their own views. Although I see that what Apple has done will upset many people because of a lack of compatibility, I still wonder about what they have done. Apple did not grow to its size by being stupid, and if there wasn't an alternative motive here, they would not have strayed from the RSS standard.
What I want to see are tests done on the standard RSS and Apple's version, and a comparison. Perhaps Apple has made RSS more efficient, and using their influence are trying to sway people to a new standard. Perhaps Apple couldn't do what they wanted to with the current RSS standard (I don't know much on the workings of RSS). But does that mean that they just pulled a stupid move and released a really buggy program?
There are only a few possibilities I see for this release, being: 1) Their code i more efficient. 2) Lack of usefulness for Apple. 3) Someone in Apple isn't doing their job properly. 4) Apple has no intentions of promoting compatibility between their Photocasting and the third party.
The point of view that Apple has a reason behind their choices gets confused however when you look at the this part which confuses me. Why would Steve Jobs say "We use industry standard RSS so that anyone can subscribe. You do not even need a Mac" if they were trying to adopt a new way of approaching RSS? There are also the issues about XML and HTTP compatibility. A more technical look shows that iPhoto is having huge amounts of trouble all over the map.
Overall, the idea of iPhoto is great and I could see myself using it, however until Steve Jobs or another Apple representative comes forth with the explanation for their own personal RSS standard, I can't see myself even attempting it.
Just for those who might have been wanting to read it, here is the article that was going to be posted instead of this one.
Quick blurb: The Bush Administration has an online pornography law that they previously tried to pass, and now they want to do it again. They have subpoenaed Google for information regarding what users look for through the search engine, in regards to pornography. Google however is refusing to disclose the information, calling it unjustified.
That is not the arguement though. The arguement is not if Mythbusters is a good show, it is the question of are they playing appropriate shows on the Discovery Channel (as to their reputation)
I have come to realize that once a channel gets enough acclaim, they open secondary channels to continue with their old company plan, and maintain the original channel simply for ratings. Examples:
MTV - How often is a diversity of music played on the main channel now?
Discovery Channel - Read the parent
CNN - I find their second channel much more informative in relation to a broader view of the news
I am just thinking of the reason behind these videos being released. Is it because they enjoy communicating with, and appreciate their fans? Or is it simply a marketing plan created by the Discovery Channel.
Don't get me wrong, I love watching them, I just prefer to keep that squishy feeling in my heart that they really love us, and the interview they did here helped that along, with this pushing it further.
"As for North America, we need to release it by Thanksgiving, or otherwise we won't receive support from the retail industry. So the Revolution will be released prior to that period."
As great as some may think this sounds (The whole "Yay! It won't be long before I can get one!" idea) what does this mean for quality of release? Are they paying more people to do all the quality checks so they can get it done in a shorter time? They better be, because earlier-then-expected release usually ends up in a higher percentage of bugs and errors then one can stand.
You would only need a bluetooth card in when you are using the mouse. When you put the mouse in the slot, there would be no need for the bluetooth card to be in there.
You must have missed the picture as the site has been slashdotted, however the design is like a handcuff, in that the USB end 'plugs' into the opposite end. Therefore, you will not be holding your wrist beside the computer.
2006 CES, Las Vegas - New Imation Flash Wristband makes data storage more convenient for everyday users
Forget wearing your heart on your sleeve and carry your memories on your wrist with the new Flash Wristband from Imation Corp. The uniquely designed Imation Flash Wristband provides an easy way to transport your precious digital files, such as photos, music or videos, securely around your wrist or attached to a backpack.
Providing the ultimate in portability and durability, the Imation Flash Wristband consists of a rubber molding shell and friction fit locking band, assuring you that the drive, and your valuable files, such as homework and e-mails, are protected from accidental damage.
"The innovative portable, durable and secure design of the Imation Flash Wristband makes transferring files from home to school or work easier and more stylish for everyday consumers," said Tom Lally, U.S. executive director of sales and marketing, Imation. "With their digital files saved securely around their wrist, users can feel confident that their valuable information will be there when they need it."
The Imation Flash Wristband holds up to 256 MB of data and can be used on any computer. To use, simply "unplug" the wristband and plug the drive into the computer's USB port. Then, "drag and drop" digital files from the computer's desktop to the wristband or vice versa, in a matter of seconds.
Starting this January, the Imation Flash Wristband will be available in "one size fits all" blue and black colors in Target stores across the U.S. for a manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) of $34.99.
Sure to be a hit with the kids! Just on that note, the average kid never wanted to look like a nerd from what I remember (suckers). This seems like an object that will probably fly better in the 18-24 demographic, mostly with kids going to university/college.
Also, I was wondering how secure the band is from falling off. I mean with most USB thumb drives,I could just attach them to my keychain and I was almost certain I would never lose it. With this thing, I would be always checking to make sure it was on my wrist.
"Robert Birge (Syracuse University) who studies the storage of data in
proteins, estimated in 1996 that the memory capacity of the brain was
between one and ten terabytes, with a most likely value of 3
terabytes. Such estimates are generally based on counting neurons and
assuming each neuron holds 1 bit. Bear in mind that the brain has
better algorithms for compressing certain types of information than
computers do."
"The human brain contains about 50 billion to 200 billion neurons
(nobody knows how many for sure), each of which interfaces with 1,000
to 100,000 other neurons through 100 trillion (10 14) to 10
quadrillion (10 16) synaptic junctions. Each synapse possesses a
variable firing threshold which is reduced as the neuron is repeatedly
activated. If we assume that the firing threshold at each synapse can
assume 256 distinguishable levels, and if we suppose that there are
20,000 shared synapses per neuron (10,000 per neuron), then the total
information storage capacity of the synapses in the cortex would be of
the order of 500 to 1,000 terabytes. (Of course, if the brain's
storage of information takes place at a molecular level, then I would
be afraid to hazard a guess regarding how many bytes can be stored in
the brain. One estimate has placed it at about 3.6 X 10 19 bytes.)"
To be honest, even though I have heard a lot of complaining and what not about the new DVD technology, I feel there is one part in TFA that shows that this is a necessary step, regardless of hardware upgrade costs and whatever else:
With mainstream adoption of high definition (HD) content, television sets and recording devices, consumers and retailers will need new storage technologies to handle ever-expanding digitized files. For example, a two-hour program in HD creates a digital file roughly 15-25 Gigabytes in size, or the equivalent of more than 13 hours of standard-definition TV.
I got a HDTV for the purpose of watching high definition television. True I can get HDTV cable, satellite, etc. however if I want to watch my favorite documentary, I would prefer it HD then standard, same goes for all the other movies I love to watch.
1. One who designs and supervises the construction of buildings or other large structures.
2. One that plans or devises: a country considered to be the chief architect of war in the Middle East.
I come to/. to read the news, about what is going on in the tech world, and generally I am looking for recent news (oxy moron? Isn't all news recent?) Anyways, someone double check the article date, because to me it says Fri, Dec 23, 2005 6:16 PM. Well that is awhile back isn't it? And I'm going to go out on a limb and seem a bit whiny, but I promise that getting my stories posted is not my objective, however I know that between me and countless other/. users there has to have been more recent and just (if not more) as interesting news.
Alright my 15 minutes of fame is up, don't drink and drive, try the veal.
The first two paragraphs from TFA explain it. Please read the article before criticizing the content:
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.
We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."
Next time please RTFA and you will see that the guys over at HardOCP agree. Here you go, since you seem too lazy to learn about what you are commenting on:
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.
We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."
Actually, that article which you are calling The Dupe, was a story about HEXUS.gaming recieving pictures and information that a company had created a watercooler for the XB360. The difference here, is that HardOCP has internal pictures, a guide on do it yourself, and final results that we can prove.
So if this vulnerability is high on the seriousness level, is anyone else wondering the same thing as I am; How and why is it that Microsoft is days behind a third party in releasing a security patch? I mean this is hitting mainstream media, and Microsoft's security patch response team is being bested by some 'guy'?
It brings interesting schemes into my mind. Oh don't mind me, I'm just going to grab my tin foil hat.
when I know they are hiring newbs from U of W that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, this sort of thing is not a surprise to me!
Interesting because UofW has an amazing Computer Science program, is reknown for the quality of the co-op students that they send out, and is one of the largest sources for technology labour in Canada.
Slashdot Mirror
It may not be the best thing to say, but I find that it will most likely be true when David Reeves, the SCEE CEO said: "We have built up a certain brand equity over time since the launch of PlayStation in 1995 and PS2 in 2000 that the first five million are going to buy it, whatever it is, even it didn't have games".
Currently, and since its conception, the world's space programs have been based on the model that we can just leave shit we don't need in space. Where were the great minds of NASA to say "Wait...what is going to happen with the rocket parts we are leaving out there." We already knew of gravity and orbits, so the idea that perhaps the stuff would just fly away doesn't seem plausible.
Us as a race, and us as the most influential countries, must look to the future, and I do see improvements, however many issues as well. We do not live in a one generation world, this is a place which we must sustain indefinately (until we find a new host planet of course).
Perhaps the problem is that companies aren't putting enough money into their security and not enforcing strict enough protocol among their staff. How many viruses felt by businesses do you assume were caused by a stupid employee? This could take the form of lazy tech staff, or even the assistant downloading something to pass the time. Then there is also the fact that alot of smaller businesses I have experience with do not have an employee that can properly setup and maintain the businesses networks and desktops. How much money are these companies spending on techie staff to remove stuff that otherwise could be done by any teenager who has experience with computers.
The number is huge, however the issue behind it I feel is being avoided and unseen. Businesses need a better method of using computers, perhaps a more business friendly OS. From the article, "Some are very small businesses that should have that technology, but they don't," and this is the problem. We won't be able to stop people from trying to bring down software and networks, however businesses can become more competent on how to prevent and protect.
This is the part of the article that really killed the title of it. Apple is not cheating on the RSS standard, they are just changing it to suit their own views. Although I see that what Apple has done will upset many people because of a lack of compatibility, I still wonder about what they have done. Apple did not grow to its size by being stupid, and if there wasn't an alternative motive here, they would not have strayed from the RSS standard.
What I want to see are tests done on the standard RSS and Apple's version, and a comparison. Perhaps Apple has made RSS more efficient, and using their influence are trying to sway people to a new standard. Perhaps Apple couldn't do what they wanted to with the current RSS standard (I don't know much on the workings of RSS). But does that mean that they just pulled a stupid move and released a really buggy program?
There are only a few possibilities I see for this release, being: 1) Their code i more efficient. 2) Lack of usefulness for Apple. 3) Someone in Apple isn't doing their job properly. 4) Apple has no intentions of promoting compatibility between their Photocasting and the third party.
The point of view that Apple has a reason behind their choices gets confused however when you look at the this part which confuses me. Why would Steve Jobs say "We use industry standard RSS so that anyone can subscribe. You do not even need a Mac" if they were trying to adopt a new way of approaching RSS? There are also the issues about XML and HTTP compatibility. A more technical look shows that iPhoto is having huge amounts of trouble all over the map.
Overall, the idea of iPhoto is great and I could see myself using it, however until Steve Jobs or another Apple representative comes forth with the explanation for their own personal RSS standard, I can't see myself even attempting it.
Quick blurb: The Bush Administration has an online pornography law that they previously tried to pass, and now they want to do it again. They have subpoenaed Google for information regarding what users look for through the search engine, in regards to pornography. Google however is refusing to disclose the information, calling it unjustified.
That is not the arguement though. The arguement is not if Mythbusters is a good show, it is the question of are they playing appropriate shows on the Discovery Channel (as to their reputation)
MTV - How often is a diversity of music played on the main channel now?
Discovery Channel - Read the parent
CNN - I find their second channel much more informative in relation to a broader view of the news
Don't get me wrong, I love watching them, I just prefer to keep that squishy feeling in my heart that they really love us, and the interview they did here helped that along, with this pushing it further.
As great as some may think this sounds (The whole "Yay! It won't be long before I can get one!" idea) what does this mean for quality of release? Are they paying more people to do all the quality checks so they can get it done in a shorter time? They better be, because earlier-then-expected release usually ends up in a higher percentage of bugs and errors then one can stand.
You would only need a bluetooth card in when you are using the mouse. When you put the mouse in the slot, there would be no need for the bluetooth card to be in there.
You must have missed the picture as the site has been slashdotted, however the design is like a handcuff, in that the USB end 'plugs' into the opposite end. Therefore, you will not be holding your wrist beside the computer.
Forget wearing your heart on your sleeve and carry your memories on your wrist with the new Flash Wristband from Imation Corp. The uniquely designed Imation Flash Wristband provides an easy way to transport your precious digital files, such as photos, music or videos, securely around your wrist or attached to a backpack.
Providing the ultimate in portability and durability, the Imation Flash Wristband consists of a rubber molding shell and friction fit locking band, assuring you that the drive, and your valuable files, such as homework and e-mails, are protected from accidental damage.
"The innovative portable, durable and secure design of the Imation Flash Wristband makes transferring files from home to school or work easier and more stylish for everyday consumers," said Tom Lally, U.S. executive director of sales and marketing, Imation. "With their digital files saved securely around their wrist, users can feel confident that their valuable information will be there when they need it."
The Imation Flash Wristband holds up to 256 MB of data and can be used on any computer. To use, simply "unplug" the wristband and plug the drive into the computer's USB port. Then, "drag and drop" digital files from the computer's desktop to the wristband or vice versa, in a matter of seconds.
Starting this January, the Imation Flash Wristband will be available in "one size fits all" blue and black colors in Target stores across the U.S. for a manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) of $34.99.
Also, from TFA: The Imation Flash Wristband holds up to 256 MB of data...
Just on that note, the average kid never wanted to look like a nerd from what I remember (suckers). This seems like an object that will probably fly better in the 18-24 demographic, mostly with kids going to university/college.
Also, I was wondering how secure the band is from falling off. I mean with most USB thumb drives,I could just attach them to my keychain and I was almost certain I would never lose it. With this thing, I would be always checking to make sure it was on my wrist.
Mark Rein says game will be ready "when it's done"
This is the same as me saying "I may fly in a racoon today" and then adding "If they produce that technology today"
http://www.geocities.com/rnseitz/The_Great_Gray_R
"Robert Birge (Syracuse University) who studies the storage of data in proteins, estimated in 1996 that the memory capacity of the brain was between one and ten terabytes, with a most likely value of 3 terabytes. Such estimates are generally based on counting neurons and assuming each neuron holds 1 bit. Bear in mind that the brain has better algorithms for compressing certain types of information than computers do."
"The human brain contains about 50 billion to 200 billion neurons (nobody knows how many for sure), each of which interfaces with 1,000 to 100,000 other neurons through 100 trillion (10 14) to 10 quadrillion (10 16) synaptic junctions. Each synapse possesses a variable firing threshold which is reduced as the neuron is repeatedly activated. If we assume that the firing threshold at each synapse can assume 256 distinguishable levels, and if we suppose that there are 20,000 shared synapses per neuron (10,000 per neuron), then the total information storage capacity of the synapses in the cortex would be of the order of 500 to 1,000 terabytes. (Of course, if the brain's storage of information takes place at a molecular level, then I would be afraid to hazard a guess regarding how many bytes can be stored in the brain. One estimate has placed it at about 3.6 X 10 19 bytes.)"
Both from Google Answers
With mainstream adoption of high definition (HD) content, television sets and recording devices, consumers and retailers will need new storage technologies to handle ever-expanding digitized files. For example, a two-hour program in HD creates a digital file roughly 15-25 Gigabytes in size, or the equivalent of more than 13 hours of standard-definition TV.
I got a HDTV for the purpose of watching high definition television. True I can get HDTV cable, satellite, etc. however if I want to watch my favorite documentary, I would prefer it HD then standard, same goes for all the other movies I love to watch.
1. One who designs and supervises the construction of buildings or other large structures.
2. One that plans or devises: a country considered to be the chief architect of war in the Middle East.
Alright my 15 minutes of fame is up, don't drink and drive, try the veal.
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.
We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."
"Four years ago next month we built the world's first water cooled Xbox. At the time, a lot of people asked us why we would want to water cool an Xbox, mostly because they didn't understand the motivation behind it. The fact of the matter was that the standard heat sink on the 700MHz Intel processor would barely get hot under normal use and surely didn't warrant the performance offered by a custom water cooling kit. At the time, we did it simply because no one else had done it and "because we could." That was our motivation then and that is partially our motivation now.
We had plans to water cool an Xbox 360 for over a year now. Little did we know that not only will this water cooling project be more fun than the original, but it may even be practical. Imagine that. With reports of heat related issues and a heat sink that can get almost too hot to touch after marathon gaming sessions, the Xbox 360 water cooling project now had a sense of purpose. We bought a retail Xbox 360 specifically for this project. The minute we got it back to the [H] labs we tore into it and, with a little help from the fine folks at Koolance, we have put together a water cooling solution that will handle anything the Xbox 360 can throw at it and literally knock your socks off."
Actually, that article which you are calling The Dupe, was a story about HEXUS.gaming recieving pictures and information that a company had created a watercooler for the XB360. The difference here, is that HardOCP has internal pictures, a guide on do it yourself, and final results that we can prove.
And the rest of us don't?
However on to more important ideas, I believe this is another great step forward in opening knowledge to everyone, such as when Princeton's collection of more than 10,000 works will be categorized, posted for world to study. These are pieces of work and acadamia that everyone should have access to, as it expands minds and ideas, and pushes us forward, intellectually.
It brings interesting schemes into my mind. Oh don't mind me, I'm just going to grab my tin foil hat.
Interesting because UofW has an amazing Computer Science program, is reknown for the quality of the co-op students that they send out, and is one of the largest sources for technology labour in Canada.