Slashdot Mirror


King Kong Lived?

Agent Provocateur writes "McMaster University recently announced the discovery of the remains of a gigantic ape, measuring over 3 meters tall and weighing up to 600kg, that supposedly co-existed alongside humans." From the article: "Jack Rink, associate professor of geography and earth sciences at McMaster, has determined that Gigantopithecus blackii, the largest primate that ever lived, roamed southeast Asia for nearly a million years before the species died out 100,000 years ago. This was known as the Pleistocene period, by which time humans had already existed for a million years."

5 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Makes me wonder.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Makes me wonder if someone was paid to withhold this information untill King Kong's release or is being paid to release it when it's unconfirmed..

    --
    I like muppets.
  2. Birth of a Legend by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Are not many legends born of some fact? Look at The Bible, for example, and many creation legends (Raven created the Earth sounds a lot like Genesis). Also, many people believe iceworms are mere legends, but it seems that they may provide some insight

    Bigfoot/Yeti? Sea Monsters?

  3. PromoPower! by jlraptor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else hope this turns out to be some gimmick to boost interest in the King King movie?

    What the hell are we gonna do with ten thousand angel ashtrays?

  4. 100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by nietsch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you take a look at this map, it suggests that modern man entered asia only about 70-60,000 years ago. So this ceartue may not have lived alongside early humans.
    Human history isn't that old really, wikipedia pegs the start of H.Sapiens at 200,000 years ago, and most of that time has been spent in Africa.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by nietsch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, wikipedia is a source that you can never trust 100% for the reasons you cite. That is why I mentioned I got the info from wikipedia. It was just the first source google came up with that answered my question. I do not know about the other sites that google offered, so this is a good as any. Better the evil you know...

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you