Slashdot Mirror


King Kong Lived?

Agent Provocateur writes "McMaster University recently announced the discovery of the remains of a gigantic ape, measuring over 3 meters tall and weighing up to 600kg, that supposedly co-existed alongside humans." From the article: "Jack Rink, associate professor of geography and earth sciences at McMaster, has determined that Gigantopithecus blackii, the largest primate that ever lived, roamed southeast Asia for nearly a million years before the species died out 100,000 years ago. This was known as the Pleistocene period, by which time humans had already existed for a million years."

40 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Makes me wonder.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Makes me wonder if someone was paid to withhold this information untill King Kong's release or is being paid to release it when it's unconfirmed..

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Makes me wonder.. by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Doubtful, besides the fact that this is hardly "giant" (come on, 10-feet tall?), marketers would have to be pretty stupid to assume that this would influence sales any. ... and we ALL know that marketers never do anything dumb.

    2. Re:Makes me wonder.. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Biologists now know that this was where pro wrestlers came from. See Nature magazine, Dec 2005, p435 "Prehistoric Smackdown Confirmed by Carbon-Dating".

    3. Re:Makes me wonder.. by holyceefax · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...or is being paid to release it when it's unconfirmed..
      Are you suggesting that the esteemed 'McMaster' university, CA, (or its 'McProfessor' of 'McAnthropology') might be less than reputable? Or that the name Gigantopithecus blackii (="Great big black thing"?) might not have been agreed upon by the wider anthropological community?
    4. Re:Makes me wonder.. by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Informative

      It wasn't withheld though. Everyone's known about Giganticus Blackii for quite some time now.

    5. Re:Makes me wonder.. by ekwhite · · Score: 4, Informative

      This guy is big, but hardly gigantic. He appears to be about twice as big as a modern lowland gorilla. For comparison, an average grizzly bear can weigh up to 1500 pounds and top 10 feet tall. The worlds record Kodiak bear was 2500 pounds and 13 feet tall. The worlds record black bear was over 900 pounds.

    6. Re:Makes me wonder.. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what are you saying?

      That he should be called Duke Kong?

  2. What killed the giant apes? by Slur · · Score: 4, Funny


    "Oh no. It wasn't the asteroids. T'was beauty that killed the beast!"

    .

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  3. Birth of a Legend by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Are not many legends born of some fact? Look at The Bible, for example, and many creation legends (Raven created the Earth sounds a lot like Genesis). Also, many people believe iceworms are mere legends, but it seems that they may provide some insight

    Bigfoot/Yeti? Sea Monsters?

    1. Re:Birth of a Legend by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Raven created the Earth sounds a lot like Genesis

      What era of Genesis. Cause I much prefer their earlier Progressive era with Peter Gabriel on vocals. The Phil Collins stuff is ok, but they got a bit too poppy towards the end.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  4. Obligatory... by m00j · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our, wait they died out! NOOOOOOOOOO!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory... by MadMoses · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that you, Anakin?

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    2. Re:Obligatory... by Hellasboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't answer that question... it's a trap!

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
  5. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All sorts of strange creatures existed during the plasticine era. I thought everyone knew that.

  6. BMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Body-mass index of 66.7. Obesity = BMI of 30 or greater. No wonder they got extinct.

    1. Re:BMI by Eponymous+Powder · · Score: 3, Funny

      My advice? Keep digging - you're sure to find the fossilised Krispy Kreme franchise somewhere nearby... the remains of the ape's SUV is probably still in the parking lot.

  7. Oh, the irony... by BrynM · · Score: 4, Funny
    I nearly thought it was suddenly April 1 when I read the fourth paragraph:
    Research into Gigantopithecus blackii began in 1935, when the Dutch paleontologist G.H. von Koenigswald discovered a yellowish molar among the "dragon bones" for sale in a Hong Kong pharmacy.
    Hmmm, the 30's and the word "kong" in there twice? Then again, TFA never mentions King Kong (which Gigantopithecus blackii is about 10 feet too short for), so maybe the association is there for subliminal hype. Those marketers are sooooo clever. Damn marketers.
    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Oh, the irony... by cakesy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, the kids at my Primary school called, they want their joke back.

  8. So we metric system users... by OpenSourced · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... can now speak about the 600 Kg gorilla. Good.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  9. Yeah. by dirtsurfer · · Score: 5, Funny

    a gigantic ape, measuring over 3 meters tall and weighing up to 600kg, that supposedly co-existed alongside humans."

    We still have these today. You can track one down by listening for its unmistakable cry; "Developers! Developers! Developers!"

  10. Re:Gigantic wang. by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
    Scientists also estimate this gorilla had a penis larger than the leg of a full grown man.
    Hence the name "Gigantopithecus blackii". It means "penis as large as a black guy" in pig latin or something like that. Or maybe it means "my giant penis will give you a black eye". I bet that's it. It's a warning label. Yep, that's it.
    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  11. Theories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there anyone from Kansas with some *plausible* theories about this monkey?

    1. Re:Theories? by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is there anyone from Kansas with some *plausible* theories about this monkey?

      'There were giants in the earth in those days' - Genesis 6:4

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Theories? by apflwr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is there anyone from Kansas with some *plausible* theories about this monkey?

      It couldn't fit on the Ark.

    3. Re:Theories? by celticchrys · · Score: 3, Insightful


                See, even the Bible admits that species can go extinct or change. (which some evolution opponents deny) God must get a good chuckle whenever someone starts howling about how evolution didn't happen, acting like they know just what process their god used to start life. Either that, or he is continually disappointed because so many of us refuse to see the clues left lying around for us to learn from, wasting these brains we were given.
                I mean, come on, a day isn't the same length on Mars as here on Earth, and yet some morons still think it must have been literally 7 Earth days in which the universe was made!

    4. Re:Theories? by LnxAddct · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You read the bible based on assumptions. You can not prove those assumptions. I am the second coming of god, disprove it... thats right, you can't. And just like Jesus did in the bible, if you test me I'll tell you not to test the lord. So I can make all the claims I want and tell you that you aren't allowed to test them... your only choice is to hope that what your parents have told you your whole life is right. If someone gave me a bible and changed around a few names, I'd think it was another epic poem by Homer. I made no claims about my intellignece, I simply implied that those who believe simply because they are told to believe don't deserve their brain. You cannot read the bible and come to a conclusion about its legitimacy. In order to prove something, it has to be proven using something else, disconnected. I can say all humans are 6 ft. tall, then look at myself and consider that a proof... but I'd be dead wrong. The way religion is set up, you can never prove or disprove its basis. It is like Santa or the Easter Bunny... you can never prove they don't exist, you just assume that based on popular oppinion they don't. Anything that you could say to try and prove that Santa doesn't exist can be refuted, maybe he's tired and taking a break, maybe he delivers presents to everyone except to you while the rest of the world is in on a giant conspiracy to lie to you about it... it could go on forever. People want more to life than there is, they want to be special, they want a purpose. People have the balls to claim that they are designed in the form of God, what kind of self-serving bullshit is that? That claim requires alot of balls. Anyway... considering how often the bible has been translated and edited and modified by various authorities who felt it necessary to make it fit their views, not to mention a few of the languages originally written in no longer exist, I'd read that book with a grain of salt. One example of horrific editorializing by the church is with the book of St. Thomas. It is one of the few books that depicts Jesus in his teens, it would of helped fill in the gap between his childhood and manhood. The church disallowed it because it showed Jesus abusing his powers, which considering Jesus is part human and a teen seems completely natural to me, but the church thought people would use it to justify doing misdeeds because even Jesus got away with at some parts in his life. The bible was put together with the intention of control in mind. The church wants people to fear, because then the church can control. Context is everything, and the bible lacks it. You only see what the church wants you to see.
      Regards,
      Steve

  12. I see 'em all the time... by ChePibe · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see apes like that all the time here on campus. But we don't have a fancy name for them - here they're called, "offensive linemen."

  13. PromoPower! by jlraptor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else hope this turns out to be some gimmick to boost interest in the King King movie?

    What the hell are we gonna do with ten thousand angel ashtrays?

  14. Body Mass Index by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Informative

    With a BMI of 600/(3^2) = 66.6 he was one big fat ape (the healthy limit for a human is 25). I guess these creatures were intelligent enough to invent fast food and maple syrup pancakes.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  15. Not "recently discovered" by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
    According to the crack Slashdot editorial team: "McMaster University recently announced the discovery of the remains of a gigantic ape".

    In fact, TFA says "Research into Gigantopithecus blackii began in 1935". (70 years ago, recent on the geological scale, perhaps.) The article is about a new dating method that determined that the ape "roamed southeast Asia for nearly a million years before the species died out 100,000 years ago", the same period humans were developing, and thus the possibility of interaction, or that we wiped them out.

  16. This is very old news by batmanmiles · · Score: 5, Funny

    The hell is this doing on Slashdot? It's in my freaking anthro textbook, fer chrissakes. My textbook.

  17. yeah right... by b4stard · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... next you're gonna tell me godzilla lived. Like there ever were a bunch of giant lizard roaming the earth. That's just silly.

  18. Re:huh..? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So it could just as easily have been a species of normal sized apes with abnormally sized heads, rather than abnormally sized apes with normal sized heads.

    Not so easily. First off, large heads will require proportionately broad hips at least, else the species will run into severe difficulties reproducing itself. Second, the proportion of head (or more accurately brain) size to body size is roughly correlated to intelligence - for instance an elephant has a bigger brain than I do, but also a much bigger body. A head as disproportionately large as you suggest would suggest that these apes were very bright - so why do we rule the world?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  19. 100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by nietsch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you take a look at this map, it suggests that modern man entered asia only about 70-60,000 years ago. So this ceartue may not have lived alongside early humans.
    Human history isn't that old really, wikipedia pegs the start of H.Sapiens at 200,000 years ago, and most of that time has been spent in Africa.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by nietsch · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is debatable (but a silly debate). If you consider Neanderthals as early humans too (they decended from H erectus just like H. sapiens) then yes H.erectus is a early human too. It's all depending on where you draw the line. If you stretch it really far, you could even argue that the first proto-mammals were early humans too. Personally(as a laymen) I draw the line at H. Sapiens. Before that is humanoid, but not human.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    2. Re:100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      wikipedia pegs the start of H.Sapiens at 200,000 years ago

      "Wikipedia pegs?!?!?" Wikipedia could be a kid in his pajamas sugared up on Fruit Loops and jujubes watching a Mummies Alive! marathon and logged on from his Mom's computer.

      Wikipedia! You cite it like it means something. C'mon...

    3. Re:100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by nietsch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, wikipedia is a source that you can never trust 100% for the reasons you cite. That is why I mentioned I got the info from wikipedia. It was just the first source google came up with that answered my question. I do not know about the other sites that google offered, so this is a good as any. Better the evil you know...

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    4. Re:100,000 years humans did not walk in asia by duckpoopy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wikipedia is just like a peer-reviewed journal where, by 'peer', I mean anybody who has access to the internet.

      --
      word.
  20. Re:Why the incesant need to convert english to met by cbv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe, just maybe, because the majority of people in the world do use metric?

  21. Re:Gigantic wang. by JemVai777 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What have 20% of the moderators been smoking?

    The aforementioned giant penis?

    --
    "The problem with our economy is that our budget is balanced by people who aren't" - A.E.N.