Slashdot Mirror


Yak Launches Free Video and Voice Service

Jamie Garson writes to tell us Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is distinguished by its free video capabilities and ease-of-use. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users can make free calls over the Internet using a high-speed connection."

11 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Er... by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, this is a poorly disguised advert, right? Because neither "free video capabilities" nor "ease-of-use" are at all distinguishing features these days. iChat AV probably does both of these things better, actually, and there's a ton of similar apps available. Even for Windows. ;)

    Linking to the Yahoo news story is a bit odd, too. Here's "Yak's" actual site.

    1. Re:Er... by DeepRedux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Notice that the story is sent in by Jamie Garson, who has a yak.ca email address. The Yahoo story is a Business Wire press release. For a fee, Business Wire will distribute any press release and Yahoo will reprint it. There is no independent reporter involved here.

  2. I for one... by fishybell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new slashvertisement overlords.

    --
    ><));>
  3. It's run by idiots by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, maybe I am. I decided "Hm - let's check it out."

    Fill out the form - done.

    Click the link to download - OK.

    They state "Mac/PC compatible"! That's good - I can do this on my Powerbook while I'm working on this code.

    Except - the only link takes you to a Windows executable. Um - I think they're missing something.

    That, and the site looks like it was designed by people who are REALLY HAPPY! WE'RE AWAKE, AND DAMN IT, WE'RE HAPPY TO SEE YOU. Wagh.

    Calm down. Take the lesson from Google: Simple. Easy. Not 20 different links and no clue which one to look for. So, too weird - forget it.

  4. download? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    so I clicked download, to see if there is a linux version. But I'm not giving them my email address even before I know if there is a linux version. What the hell they think?

    it's not free, the price is your privacy.

    PS: if anyone ,,sacrificed his privacy'' to check, please tell if there is a linux version.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  5. Slightly reworded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An employee of a company called Yak (jgarson@yak.ca) writes to tell us Yahoo is kindly storing a press release from same company. The press release has the usual glowing praise that offers no objectivity due to the obvious financial interests of the writer. The company has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree, but has no marketing team, nor money, to promote it, and has decided to try to get it in front of people through fooling slashdot editors into believing the press release is a news report. From the press release: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is just another soon-to-be burned-out shell of a car along the side of the dot com highway. What truly distinguishes it from other offerings is that it offers both video and voice services, which have only been available in most free chat clients for half a decade now. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users are locked into a proprietary system which is likely to riddle their machine with spyware."

  6. Re:How is this different to MSN Messenger? by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's different because it's incompatible. It's Yet Another incompatible talK service.

    What the world needs is something that lets anyone talk to anyone else.

  7. This is a mere press release! by lancejjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: [...]

    This isn't an article written by a reporter. This is a corporate press release, evidently written by the owners of the product.

    Advertising? Yep. News? No.

  8. I've tested this program, Camfrog is far better by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, This requires a high-speed conection for one-on-one? Camfrog only requires a 56 k modem and is so good that deaf people can "speak" over video near-flawlessly over 56k. Plus it's loaded with more features, offers actual chat rooms you can go to and see loads of other people (up to 100 cams if you pay a one-time $50 for the pro version of Camfrog Client) in the room, PLUS stream music, PLUS type. Oh, not to mention IRC-style options like giving others ops, half-ops, make users have voice (friend of the room,) and on top of that all it comes with IM built-in. Yak doesn't compare, YET.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  9. Re:Can anyone help? by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's called Gizmo Project. www.gizmoproject.com

  10. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's not clear to me why it wouldn't be free, or why we need a "provider" for this in the first place. You're already paying the ISP for bandwidth, do we really need a web page provider, ssh provider... another "provider" and another bill for every protocol over IP?

    Vonage, for instances, bills themselves as a VOIP provider, which I don't see as being quite the case. For pure VOIP calls, you don't need a provider. What Vonage really sells is a VOIP-to-POTS bridge... a transition technology until such time as every telephone and blackberry have IP addresses.