Slashdot Mirror


Yak Launches Free Video and Voice Service

Jamie Garson writes to tell us Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is distinguished by its free video capabilities and ease-of-use. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users can make free calls over the Internet using a high-speed connection."

26 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by geomon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember getting Teamspeak to contact my family and friends. We would set up a server and contact each other via IM to set up a session. Now Teamspeak charges for their service. I'm sure that was their intention all along, but it was sad to see it go subscription only.

    I wonder how long yakForFree will remain *free*? I suppose their free plan is a give away for getting people to sign up for the enhanced services. But I can envision a time in the near future when the free will giveway to *cheap*. I guess that if the price is right, that isn't a bad prospect either.

    I guess I'd better use it while the free offer is still good!

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by joelwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is free because it's free. There are aparently upgardes available to allow calling to PTSN (land line phones). It is however very cool.

    2. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I wonder how long yakForFree will remain *free*? I suppose their free plan is a give away for getting people to sign up for the enhanced services. But I can envision a time in the near future when the free will giveway to *cheap*."

      If they grab enough marketshare, they can sell advertising to splash during usage. I can't see any other way of them making money off this without charging for it. Also, by stating that it's a videophone, they can limit people complaining about ad display on their monitors, like people did when it was attempted with VOIP... though I'm sure it will be in their EULA.

      Possibly a tiered fee system, pay more for no ads.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Kamidari · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you are charging your friends and family to use your teamspeak server, it's still free (as in beer).

    4. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's not clear to me why it wouldn't be free, or why we need a "provider" for this in the first place. You're already paying the ISP for bandwidth, do we really need a web page provider, ssh provider... another "provider" and another bill for every protocol over IP?

      Vonage, for instances, bills themselves as a VOIP provider, which I don't see as being quite the case. For pure VOIP calls, you don't need a provider. What Vonage really sells is a VOIP-to-POTS bridge... a transition technology until such time as every telephone and blackberry have IP addresses.

  2. Er... by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, this is a poorly disguised advert, right? Because neither "free video capabilities" nor "ease-of-use" are at all distinguishing features these days. iChat AV probably does both of these things better, actually, and there's a ton of similar apps available. Even for Windows. ;)

    Linking to the Yahoo news story is a bit odd, too. Here's "Yak's" actual site.

    1. Re:Er... by DeepRedux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Notice that the story is sent in by Jamie Garson, who has a yak.ca email address. The Yahoo story is a Business Wire press release. For a fee, Business Wire will distribute any press release and Yahoo will reprint it. There is no independent reporter involved here.

    2. Re:Er... by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, this is a poorly disguised advert, right?

      Yes. It is.

      Because neither "free video capabilities" nor "ease-of-use" are at all distinguishing features these days.

      True they're not - however if you'd bothered to read the link you posted, you'd notice that in the FAQ:

      Q.) What are Open Standards and why does it matter?
      A.) An Open Standard is more than just a specification. The principles behind the standard, and the practice of offering and operating the standard, are what make the standard Open. yakForFree follows the standards proposed mostly by the IETF.

      If true, this is an advantage over most other chat clients (I am talking about video here)

      iChat AV probably does both of these things better, actually, and there's a ton of similar apps available. Even for Windows. ;)

      Hmmmmn.

      I presume the person who submitted this story was paid for promoting this product - I hope you were well paid for your adverisment too.
      --
      My pics.
    3. Re:Er... by Da_Biz · · Score: 2

      I have an idea: let the readers meta-moderate people with the ability to post new stories. As the months pass, why do I feel that I'm being had when I see an exhortation to "Meta-Moderate for Slashdot"? I just feel like I'm contributing free labor to a downward-trending initiative.

  3. I for one... by fishybell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new slashvertisement overlords.

    --
    ><));>
  4. It's run by idiots by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, maybe I am. I decided "Hm - let's check it out."

    Fill out the form - done.

    Click the link to download - OK.

    They state "Mac/PC compatible"! That's good - I can do this on my Powerbook while I'm working on this code.

    Except - the only link takes you to a Windows executable. Um - I think they're missing something.

    That, and the site looks like it was designed by people who are REALLY HAPPY! WE'RE AWAKE, AND DAMN IT, WE'RE HAPPY TO SEE YOU. Wagh.

    Calm down. Take the lesson from Google: Simple. Easy. Not 20 different links and no clue which one to look for. So, too weird - forget it.

  5. I always wanted this ... by external400kdiskette · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a discussion about this a while ago:

    Me: I want 10 year old netmeeting technology to go with my VOIP.
    My friend Masood Khan: Just Wait!
    Me: Wow that worked.
    Khan: It's an age-old diplomatic trick.

  6. download? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    so I clicked download, to see if there is a linux version. But I'm not giving them my email address even before I know if there is a linux version. What the hell they think?

    it's not free, the price is your privacy.

    PS: if anyone ,,sacrificed his privacy'' to check, please tell if there is a linux version.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  7. Until by varmittang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are blocked by router filters that kill the connections.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  8. Free software VoIP by MrvFD · · Score: 2, Informative

    Luckily there's also one free software "skype-like" VoIP in development - http://www.openwengo.com/ (GPL). For video features, there's always GnomeMeeting, though it's more for businesses than for the average Joe because there's no centralized "address book" except for Seconix. And Gaim 2.0 should support Google Talk protocol, together with some webcam support for various protocols.

  9. If you want better quality, use SightSpeed by amr42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a free video phone that works great try SightSpeed. They have been consitantly ranked the best by PC Magazine and PC World.

  10. Slightly reworded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An employee of a company called Yak (jgarson@yak.ca) writes to tell us Yahoo is kindly storing a press release from same company. The press release has the usual glowing praise that offers no objectivity due to the obvious financial interests of the writer. The company has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree, but has no marketing team, nor money, to promote it, and has decided to try to get it in front of people through fooling slashdot editors into believing the press release is a news report. From the press release: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is just another soon-to-be burned-out shell of a car along the side of the dot com highway. What truly distinguishes it from other offerings is that it offers both video and voice services, which have only been available in most free chat clients for half a decade now. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users are locked into a proprietary system which is likely to riddle their machine with spyware."

  11. Re:How is this different to MSN Messenger? by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's different because it's incompatible. It's Yet Another incompatible talK service.

    What the world needs is something that lets anyone talk to anyone else.

  12. Re:Windows, Mac, and Linux???? by PoprocksCk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Video, no -- but check out BitWise [www.bitwisechat.com] which offers whiteboard and voip, and is for Windows, OS X, and Linux. I've tried it on my Linux box -- it's a very polished app and it works great.

  13. This is a mere press release! by lancejjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: [...]

    This isn't an article written by a reporter. This is a corporate press release, evidently written by the owners of the product.

    Advertising? Yep. News? No.

  14. I've tested this program, Camfrog is far better by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, This requires a high-speed conection for one-on-one? Camfrog only requires a 56 k modem and is so good that deaf people can "speak" over video near-flawlessly over 56k. Plus it's loaded with more features, offers actual chat rooms you can go to and see loads of other people (up to 100 cams if you pay a one-time $50 for the pro version of Camfrog Client) in the room, PLUS stream music, PLUS type. Oh, not to mention IRC-style options like giving others ops, half-ops, make users have voice (friend of the room,) and on top of that all it comes with IM built-in. Yak doesn't compare, YET.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  15. Rebundeled Technologie by CyMunz · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is clearly a free (and branded) version of eyeBeam from Xten (link) now known as CounterPath. Therefore my guess is that it's a service pretty similar to Free World Dialup (link) but with video (not sure if FWD support video).

  16. This is NOT yak's VOIP by Valiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the way you are thinking. If you are thinking that you can download this and call your buddy on his cell, you would be incorrect. You want that service, you gatta pay to use their yakToAnyone service.

    This is an instant messenger-like application that does voice and video, a la [every other IM service here].

    --

    -Valiss
  17. Re:Can anyone help? by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, it's called Gizmo Project. www.gizmoproject.com

  18. Re:BroadVoice. VOIP software? by mikerozh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use hamachi and run VoIP over it.

  19. Gimme just one line. by lukOh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hallo?

    All I just need is one any-interface, GPL, multiplatform piece of software that roughly:
    -supports RSA asymmetric encryption with gpg keys to avoid being listened by the kid next door
    -uses any decent combination of patent-free protocols to get just acceptable voice over broadband
    -I give it a kindly f'g IP ADDRESS and PORT , I AUTHENTICATE then TALK to whoever is at the other side.

    say: a multiplatform slightly improved netmeeting with single-port support to jump through isp portfilters/ proxies/ automatic firewalls with just one port forwarding

    Everything is out there: technology, code, codecs, IPv4, broadband connections.
    Any clue, ANYONE?

    I want not a community to join, no centralized servers to track me anytime I want to say hi to mum, no search capabilities, no calls to fixed or mobile phone numbers, not a PSTN phone replacement, no emergency number reachability, no fixed-location or registration of any sort, no other people's p2p calls killing my 256k upstream, -nothing as such-

    Or if that's so hard to grasp just a client-server linux voice bundle I can setup for my own use?

    I found hundreds of fancy clients, each with its own server network, community, subscription, "gimme your email or die", "It's free(for now, you s*r)", "I swear I have no spyware" disclaimer and "Best rated" claims all in in 25165824 colors.

    AllRight.
    `vi myTalk.c`
    [..] ..all was so freaking good using gopher..