The Rise of Digg.com
An anonymous reader writes "Wired has a story about Digg, a community bookmarking site that creates its own version of the Slashdot effect. It's a provocatively titled piece - 'Digg Just Might Bury Slashdot' - but goes on to consider the obvious similarities between the two and the differences. Digg is more chaotic, immediate and user driven, whereas Slashdot features more in-depth and technical discussions."
Well, I hate navel-gazing news but I think the aggregation of blogs is a critical step in the future of on-line content, and Digg is doing good work here. The interesting thing will happen when their population grows a bit more. Scalability is hard... but I imagine the millions of dollars of VC funding will really help.
Slashdot x Digg = The DigDot Effect
...
*Internet explodes*
Slashdot: Stories are often days old (and duplicates abound).
They are not duplicates. They are a Beowulf Cluster of Stories.
Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!
http://financialpetition.org/
Ok, so /. links a story to them, and they link one back. The question is, who's servers are gonna melt down first?
Just another day in Paradise
Digg.com had this article posted six hours ago.
> Digg is more chaotic, immediate and user driven, whereas
> Slashdot features more in-depth and technical discussions.
*shudders*
Digg can't really be that bad?