Format of Choice for a Legal, Free, Audio-eBook?
audioAuthor asks: "Let's say I have a recorded audio-book (no music, just speech), which I want to share with the world. What format should I use to distribute it? Main requirements would be: 'Everyone is allowed to redistribute it without any restrictions" and "Usable as widely as possible'. I have been thinking of MP3, Ogg Vorbis and Speex. MP3 would be really nice, as it's usable almost everywhere, even without a computer, but it has licensing problems which I don't quite understand. Speex is free and designed for speech, but it's not widely supported at the moment. I think that Ogg Vorbis is currently better supported than Speex, and also free, but not designed for speech and would take more space to achieve same quality. So what do you say? Which one of these should I choose, or are there other formats to consider?"
It isn't that hard to release an audio book in all 3 formats.
If bandwidth is limited, then Speex gives you the best size:quality ratio for voice. Otherwise, offer MP3, Vorbis, Speex, and whatever else you feel like. If you don't have to choose, why limit yourself?
Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
Simple.
If you want to make a political/philosophical statement use Ogg Vorbis.
If you want no-one to ever bother listening to it use Speex.
If you want many people to listen to it use MP3.
- For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat
Have you thaught about flac? http://flac.sourceforge.net/. it is another open source royalty free codec that supports lossless comporession which might be a good opion if you want high quality and no data loss because of compression.
As a noncommercial end-user, MP3 licensing is not a problem for you. If you were developing software to implement MP3, either encoding or decoding, or your MP3-encoded content were part of a commercial (i.e., revenue generating) enterprise, then you would need a license. Since neither of those apply, MP3 is free for you to use.
ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
I'm pretty sure LAME would work as an mp3 encoder for your case. Check the website at lame.sourceforge.net to read up on it, but I'm pretty sure it's what you're looking for, considering there are no legal issues behind it (It's LGPL'd).
And I agree that Speex is useless (who's gonna listen to it? I'd never heard of it before now), and Ogg isn't very common outside of Linux from my experience...
...offer bit-torrents.
Bandwidth limitation really isn't an excuse, nowadays.
LAME doesn't have to pay licensing fees to MPEG because LAME is Free software licensed under the Lesser GNU General Public License. Although some MPEG dudes from Germany own patents regarding MP3-encoding, they only charge licensing fees for commercial usage of MP3 encoding that crosses with their patents.
'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
Entirely misinformation.
(A) The (L)GPL patent clause doesn't make any distinction between commercial use or not.
(B) LAME is not Free Software in any country that respects MP3 patents -- it's actually illegal to distribute according to the LGPL licence in places like the US and Germany.
(C) If someone does illegally distribute LAME to you, Fraunhofer will still want their damn money.
What about AMR? It seems to be designed for speech and widely supported by mobile devices. Though I'm not sure about the licensing issues.
On a side note, does anyone know of an easy way to convert AMR to MP3/OGG/WAV, preferable on Linux? Yes, I've tried Google results like this, but couldn't make it to work.
FLAC can be converted into whatever format the user wants. Considering it's speech you should get around 50% compression from the wavs. Of course not everybody will want to download that so put it in mp3 too. I can't think of anything that plays Ogg and not mp3. Speex is not that widespread at this point, so if anybody really wants it they can convert from FLAC. And that's the beauty of FLAC too. Some new format gets popular you can convert it into that too.
Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
For iPod-users, create a mono ~50kbps VBR AAC file using faac --tns -q90 -i mybook_mono.wav -o mybook_ipod.m4b . Using the extension .m4b will make the iPod treat it as a "real" audiobook and it will be bookmarkable.
For pure speech, -q0 Vorbis is more than good enough and it will also be around 50 kbps.
For those who can't use AAC or Vorbis, create a low quality MP3.
My other account has a 3-digit UID.
I own an MP3 player with 256MB that I mostly use to listen to spoken word stuff. At 16 kbps, which seems to be the minimum rate for that kind of content, I can store at most 25 hours. Yeah, that's a lot, but suppose I feel a sudden urge to drive accross country? I'd basically have to get another player with more storage or removable media. If I could use a speech-optimized format, instead of music-optimized MP3, I could use my flash more effectively.
None of which is an argument for using any format except MP3. Like VHS and QWERTY, it's not the best, but it is a de-facto standard. And that's enough.
Fancy meeting you here :-)
;-)
And yes you should write the "Why Star Wars Sucks" essay. I'd be curious to read
[karma bonus switched off due to utter off-topicness]
Hey,
You might try heading over to http://www.podiobooks.com and send the guys there a query about this.
They are using mp3 as the format.
Its all Free, your unemcumbered on the MP3 as long as you use LAME as the encoder.
Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
If you want anyone who doesn't give a damn to hear it, release it in MP3.
'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
I've driven across the country several times, so I just did a few double takes at your original comment, started counting on my fingers etc, before seeing this part of the conversation ;)
...
My Ford Escort wagon sometimes topped 40mpg; that, plus the fixed costs (for a current car owner at least) like insurance, licensure, etc, and the flexibility of setting one's own pace and stopping points, are why I liked to travel ludicrous distances by car. However, the Escort wasn't so hot at topping things like, say, mountains.
Glad I'm now somewhat city-bound for a while, what with the price of gas
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5