Slashdot Mirror


Baltimore to Test Cell Phone Traffic Monitoring

Momoru writes "The Baltimore Sun is reporting that a Canadian company, Delcan NET, will begin testing a technology that determines the flow of automobile traffic by monitoring cell phone traffic. The company promises a revolutionary way to determine backups, but privacy advocates fear the implications of a third party tracking users by their cell phones."

9 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. First TRIPLICATE!!! by RKBA · · Score: 5, Informative

    *Ahem*

    TRIPLICATE!!!

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/19/07 45248&tid=126&tid=215&tid=158

    Note: Yes, I reported this a few minutes ago.

    1. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, since "duplicate" boils into "dupe", I'd have to say that short for triplicate would be "tripe".

    2. Re:First TRIPLICATE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Let me be the first to put this in an elegant six-article list:

  2. What? by lewiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is amazing. Normally I'd just ignore a duplicate (or triplicate by the looks of it) but I'm amazed it can happen with just one article sandwiched in between.
    Bizarre.

  3. Cause by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what's causing all these dupes?

    Hyperthreading.

  4. hmmm.... by Malor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, this IS pretty important. Maybe they'll post it once per affected phone.

  5. I submitted this with a funnier headline... by sparkes · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but it doesn't matter it'll be posted sometime today ;-)

    --
    grab some geek gear at http://nerd.ws

  6. An open letter to the Managment... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, Editors!

    I love this site, I love the discussions that the comments generate and I enjoy this community being one of the places (other than IRC) where technically-minded people can come together - hell, even some of the trolls are pretty damn funny, and I'm not usually one to join in the crowd of people screaming 'Dupe!' every time you repost an article from the previous week or day - I don't always get a chance to check /. everyday and so if something gets reposted I often haven't noticed the original and still enjoy reading it, and I don't see why dupes attract so much of the screaming masses to deride you.

    However, two on the front page, with only one article seperating them, no less, is utterly rediculous - that'd be like the TV news reporting on the same thing, with the same content, but with a different correspondant - it's not professional, and it'd be pretty poor even for an amateur setup - an analogy would be it's OK for the same announcement to be on two days in a row, but two in the same bulletin is sloppy and unprofessional. It's even below the standard of your average LiveJournal blogger, and it's certainly put a doubt in my mind over my decision to treat myself to a /. subscription for Christmas - while this isn't quite 'you lost yourself a customer', those few beers I'd buy instead of a subscription are now looking that much more tempting...

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.