Slashdot Mirror


Organizing Organic Chemical Reactions?

thethinkingilia asks: "I am studying organic chemistry and I am seeking an intelligent way to organize all the reactions that I am responsible for memorizing. In general, one can think of this as a directed state machine where a functional group can be transformed to another functional group given set conditions. It must be robust enough to allow for tens of states, the possibility of connection between any of said states, and be able to display not only the states, but conditions for transition between these states. This could be accomplished with HTML hyperlinks, but it would be great to have an elegant flow chart-type solution. Please, help me bring some software sanity to the life sciences!"

11 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Now you want us to do your studying for you? by Bootle · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Come on, this is ridiculous...

    I took Organic in school, the only way to get through it is to suffer. My course was meant not to teach, but to weed out pre-meds. Damn! Don't forget the 5 hour labs where you sneeze and your whole yield is gone POOF!

    Here's a great studying tip: suck it up! The alternative is to grow a pair and realize chemistry is crap and jump ship to the real science, physics! Everything else is stamp-collecting, as Rutherford said.

    If I sound bitter it's just because I am. Goddamn pre-meds...

    1. Re:Now you want us to do your studying for you? by ChuckleBug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IAAC, the memorizing is a terrible way to learn chemistry (actually it's a bad way to learn anything). you'll never learn anything by memorizing rules.

      This is partially true, but I think your generalization is too broad. There are some things in organic chem you just have to memorize. Easy things like names of functional groups and stuff, but also some named reactions are just too complex to be able to just derive from basic principles. Especially knowing reaction conditions. Do you need heat, a catalyst, an oxidizer or reducer, or what? You have to memorize what Tollen's reagent is, and so on. I agree that it's important to understand the broader concepts, but there's no way around a lot of memorization in organic.

      I'm one of those weirdos who always loved this stuff. Organic labs produce the most wonderfully indescribable odors. Even something mundane, like pyridene, has an odor I have never been able to adequately describe to anyone. You have to experience it. (DISCLAIMER: I do not recommend inhaling large amounts of pyridene vapor.)

  2. Mostly OT: a favorite organic reaction by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    butyric acid (nasty smelling chemical in vomit and rancid dairy products) + ethanol + sulfuric acid (IIRC; I know it's one of the strong acids) -> ethyl butyrate (essence of pineapple)

  3. Directed Graph Layout by tfinniga · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
  4. Honestly... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Instead of focusing efforts on finding ways to organize all the information you have to memorize, just memorize it. Whatever time you've allotted, use to just study the stuff over and over again.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  5. Electrons by Rick_T · · Score: 4, Informative

    My (graduate level) organic professor told us that the only thing we needed to remember was that "electrons flow from the electron source to the electron sink".

    By and large, he was right - and organic made a lot more sense than it did to me as an undergraduate. Undferatanding HOW the reactions worked was easier than memorization dozens of twisty little reaction types, all alike.

    But if you're taking about sophomore level organic - come on, is there really THAT much stuff to memorize?

    --
    -- Rick
    1. Re:Electrons by Daedala · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paul Scudder's Electron Flow in Organic Chemistry is the textbook you want. It's all about electrons going from source to sink.

      (New, the book is overpriced. Even the author thinks so -- he was complaining back when they raised the price to $30, and now it's $50. So get it used and send him a nice email if it helps.)

      --
      What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
  6. Microstructured cellulose + patterned graphite by amide_one · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll need four things, all readily available: Microstructured cellulose sheets, a device for depositing thin layers of graphite in controlled patterns, a flexible optical transducer (broad spectral response, high spatial resolution) to read out the data, and a sophisticated neural network to bring them all together.

    Nothing beats the flexibility of writing stuff down on paper. Over and over again, if need be. Flash cards, notes, whatever. If you're determined to use a computer, you don't need a program to build a fancy directed graph with HTML hyperlinks and SMILES structures and ... -- I did it just fine with a text editor and a bit of creativity in the notation.

    You'll also find that the reactions are generally organized pretty well in the textbook or lecture material.

    Finally, "organizing" means either "doing pretty pictures" or "recognizing that this is SN2". It's very easy to spend so much time making pretty pictures that you don't actually learn any of the content. If you recognize reactions by type (mechanism) and substrate (secondary amine with a phenyl ring two carbons away), then all that's left is "reflux this at 120C in toluene with SnCl2", and... well, you'll have to memorize that anyway.

    In short -- get through organic first, then (with a bit of background to understand what's important in "organizing" and "presenting", and better knowledge of what's already available) go on and write your own tool to "bring bring some software sanity to the life sciences". Don't expect to take the world of chemistry by storm, though; that sort of thing's been tried before, and the general reaction is "can't kids these days memorize anything?"

  7. The Obvious Solution by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 3, Informative

    (from someone who teaches Chemistry for a living)

    You're taking your courses in the wrong order. You need P-Chem and Inorganic to understand _why_ Organic works. Once you can understand which way the electrons flow, you're halfway done. Look for Woodward and Hoffman's book on orbital symmetry interactions, and the old Ian Fleming (different one) "Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions". Albright, Burdett, Whangbo, "Orbital Interactions in Chemistry" is also a good general source, though it's rather inorganic in focus.

    The other half is to actually memorize 2000 reactions, if you're going to be a professional organic chemist. You have to know solvent, temperature, and related reactions. You need to know how mechanisms work, what transition states look like, and how both steric and electronic effects interact. To this you can add metal-mediated transformations (organometallic). This is why organic (so say my female colleagues) is overwhelmingly male; the same ability that makes you able to remember 2000 random movie quotes or baseball statistics allows you to memorize organic reactions instead.

    Take a deep breath, and start making flash cards. Remember, Organic is just Inorganic with boring elements.

    As to the software question, CambridgeSoft (http://www.cambridgesoft.com/ and Accelrys (http://www.accelrys.com/ are two examples of people with expert systems that do some of what you're asking. You will not like the price.

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  8. Solve the Schrodinger equation... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 3, Funny

    The rest is just footnotes.

  9. Try this software... by qx128 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I think you might find GraphViz interesting. It's a pretty easy-to-use program that allows you to produce graphs from a text file. You can add labels, color, edge weights, etc. All you'd have to do is write a text file "linking" the reactions. You can even name the nodes of the graph in an intuitive manner. Here would be an example:

    digraph {
    NaCl [label = "table salt"];
    Na -> NaCl;
    Cl -> NaCl;
    }

    And then GraphViz turns that into a picture. Specifically, you'll be intrested in the program called "dot" that comes with the GraphViz package.

    Hope this helps!

    -- Dylan