Slashdot Mirror
New Free Open Source Enterprise Magazine
An anonymous reader writes "A new free Open Source Enterprise magazine was launched today. The publication was built entirely with Open Source tools, including the GIMP, Scribus and Open Office. It is distributed in PDF format, and focuses on Open Source Solutions related to Enterprise Data Networking. The first issue looks at some interesting stuff include MultiLayer Switching in Linux. A torrent is also available."
tuxmagazine.com also provides free magazines in PDF format. I've read through all of them and must say they are very good. But I do miss being able to hold something in my hands while I lie back in bed. A laptop is too awkward for casual reading of PDFs.
Meh.
someone was willing to take it upon themselves to work their asses off in their free time and get the best content from developers, users, etc... and were to try and create a physical add supported magazine would you subscribe?
We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
The guys over at Linux Journal are gonna be PISSED!
"Is the CEO of a Fortune 500 corporation suddenly going to replace his reliable expensive Solaris clusters running Oracle with a bunch of cheap Linux blades running MySQL. . ."
Good Lord! I hope not.
KFG
This could be a cool magazine, although if their definition of "Enterprise" differs from reality, it will backfire. I hope that they don't write up a bunch of articles on how to scan logs with Perl, or install RedHat's commercial Linux on a Dell server. Please, no "IPTables is just as good as a Checkpoint" or "Squid is better than MS-ISA" kinds of articles. Those decisions are already made, settled, done, bought, and paid for.
Lets see articles on how to integrate disparate systems, how the Linux version of Oracle runs better per dollar, etc.
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
I doubt a free software can replace one that costs millions. But I believe that OS software can replace comercial ones that cost 50k - 200k. (Plone being such an example)
I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
...I just realized how much of a nerd I really am, by getting excited about this. Time to convert it to reflow format for the pda...
FLR
We in the Open Source community need to stop being so introspective, and start MARKETING the advantages of open source to the suits.
Um, that's what this magazine does. This issue includes information about rolling your own telephony system with open source tools to reduce costs and infrastructure requirements.
It's a one-two punch: a magazine ABOUT open-source solutions, created WITH open-source solutions. Just on virtue of them using open-source software to create the magazine they've demonstrated one area where open source can shine. Every time they publish a new issue this fact will be highlighted.
Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
n/t
It would be need if they could made a podcast stype of distribution for this - or maybe an rss e-book?
"But I do miss being able to hold something in my hands while I lie back in bed."
Most geeks don't have this problem.
did anyone make a coral cache of the pdf? i can't connect to their ftp site.
"...that's as white as it gets; all the bits are on..."
Information wants to be FREE AS IN BEER. And I am a stinking basement-dwelling Lunix user who resents paying for ANYTHING, no matter how useful it might be.
The fact that you find this implausable leads me to believe you've never been employeed.
"Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
I've looking over issue #1 and am wondering who exactly the target audience is. At first, I would have assumed it was for hard-core FOSS-lovers who want to know how they can convince their boss to use the latest OSS application (or who want to know about "the next big enterprise OSS" thing that they should give a try). However, consider some of these quotes:
An article on page 15 ("Opening the Jar on Google Honeypots") explains: "With this growth in the Internet, a problem arose: finding the page with the information you are actually looking for. This is where search engines come into play, allowing Internet users to find the page that they want."
On page 23, they have an article "An Introduction to Linux and Open Source for Business" written in a Q&A style. The first question is "What is this 'Open Source' thing I keep hearing about?"
You get the idea. These articles are clearly targetted at people who have no experience with OSS, but are curious. They even seem to be targetted at management-types who may be interested in learning about new trends in technology. There are other articles that are clearly aimed at a more experience and techno-saavy crowd. So I guess they are really trying to cover the board, and get a wide variety of people reading their magazine.
I guess I'm wondering if that's the best strategy. For a printed magazine, I can understand trying to appeal to newbies and zealots alike, since they both have good reasons for buying the magazine. For a web-only magazine, however, I strongly suspect that the only people who will ever read it will be the geek crowd anyways, in which case it seems like a bit of a waste to have so many introductory articles.
Come on folks, I'm only getting 2K/sec download.
Stop using dial-up!
j/k
if it is for who i think it is for then they really need to work on parts of their delivery, the content seems good.
for example:
In the "buisness" section that explains opensource and the OS licenses and such, there is a panel on the last page where some guy is quoted and he uses "FUD". There is no explination of the term. Did i miss the memo that went out to everyone's bosses explaining these sorts of terms?
In some cases, yes, despite it being more expensive in the end due to higher administration costs.
Open source is happening; I am a pretty darn senior IT consultant by day, and large enterprises in the IT space are building stuff with it.
Smart ones are also doing true life cycle cost estimates, and functional and reliability trade studies and analysis, and in some cases are chosing not to use open source or only use it for limited applications.
But it's here, for real.
I am not an open source zealout; I spent several years at a Sun VAR and am quite familiar with "commrecial" OSes, enterprise infrastructure and business applications, etc. I still have a good relationship with local Sun VARs and will recommend Sun/Solaris/Veritas/(pick your major brand storage)/Oracle etc when technically and financially and operationally appropriate. Which they still are for significant parts of the enterprise IT problems set.
But Linux is clearly heeerrreeeee....
Would you feel better if he replaced his reliable expensive Solaris clusters running Oracle with a bunch of reliable Linux blades running Oracle? It happens more than you think.
It would be very interesting (at least for me) to read about the making of O3. The open source DTP solution is somewhat disputed these days.
Hello,
I am in touch with John Buswell: he is really dedicated, and I am sure the magazine will go far.
What I don't understand, though, is why O3 made it on Slashdot the minute it came out, while Free Software Magazine didn't - never.
No wonder Digg is going strong the way it is. Moody moderator to pick stories make moody decisions.
Merc.
"Would you feel better if he replaced his reliable expensive Solaris clusters running Oracle with a bunch of reliable Linux blades running Oracle?"
Quite a bit, yes. Bear in mind that I'm also on record as detesting Oracle, even at times questioning the intelligence, professional competence and parantage of anyone who would work for the company as a programer.
"It happens more than you think."
I doubt it.
KFG
The publication was built entirely with Open Source tools, including the GIMP, Scribus and Open Office.
Is this really something to be bragged about? It just seems like it should go without saying that a publication about open source would be written with OSS. I mean, if M$ created a publication with OSS, the laughter would probably inspire it's own news stories at many websites.
Just kinda shows how OSS isn't quite mainstream yet.
[ducking]I love linux! I love linux![/ducking]
"The publication was built entirely with Open Source tools, including the GIMP, Scribus and Open Office. It is distributed in PDF format..."
One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong,
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?
---
WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.
Man, that's not only cool, it's OSEM.
Am I the only one who read the headline and thought "What kind of magazine could they make out of a cancelled show? Get over it!"
Even on Slashdot, too much slashdot can mess up your interpretive skills
Yup...
I'm going to assume you're talking about pdf here. I'll also assure you that the format is indeed open
I should clarify something. I didn't mean to mention twice that OSS solutions and Linux sometimes cost more than commercial non-open solutions without mentioning that commercial non-open solutions also sometimes cost more than OSS solutions.
I have seen it go both ways in project detailed analysis, depending on the problem set and business' operations and IT standards. Accidentally implying that OSS was more expensive all the time was not my intention, and I certainly don't believe that.
Your magazine sounds interesting and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter. ..oh, uh, never mind.
Thanks for the tip! This will make viewing porn much more, uh, pleasant.
Do you care what kind of tools you car was built with?
www.loudernet.com
I used to read a free, ad-supported magazine for a techie operating system back in the day (OS/2 Professional). They eventually went to a subscriber-paid model. The reason for this was that they published a negative review of a piece of software, one that was advertised in their magazine. They were significantly pressured by the advertiser to not publish the review, or to change their conclusions.
How often do you see eWeek totally trash a product? Sure, they point out downsides, but it seems that everything they write about is described in an overall positive light. Why? They too are an advertiser-paid magazine!
Unless that's the type of magazine you want to publish, it's hard to go advertiser-only...
Linux IT Consulting and Domino Development in Michigan
A more likely scenario is that the CEO will replace his reliable and expensive (but the purchase costs were written off 2 years ago and it's well bedded in with minimal support costs so, on paper at least, it's currently close to free) cluster running Oracle for a bunch of over priced blades running Windows 2003 and Microsoft SQL Server (plus have to retrain all their support staff) on the strength of an article in eWeek or a Gartner Report.
Stephen
"Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
You don't retrain anyone these days. You just tell your Indians to go and find another bunch of Indians who happen to know Linux! Support costs are built into the contract so there tends not to be any big thing either way. It is just that there seem to be more MCSEs than Linux admins in Chennai.
See my journal, I write things there
Why do you doubt a free software can't replace one that cost millions ?
wtf.n0x.org
From a quick look the graphic design of the layout frankly is disappointing: overly simplistic and lacking any design value it all looks like it was executed by an amateur without a proper DTP tool (say, a word processor).