Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Court Orders Lycos to Reveal Client

linumax writes to tell us InformationWeek is reporting that the Dutch Supreme Court ruled against Lycos last Friday stating that they wrongly protected the identity of a user who posted "slanderous allegations" against an internet postage-stamp dealer. From the article: "The dealer and claimant, identified in court documents only as A. Pessers, took Lycos to court in 2003, seeking the details of its client so he could pursue financial damages allegedly resulting from the allegations."

3 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Re:the 'Music Industry' is excited... by scsirob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not for slander, but because this case has set a precedent that allows the music industry to trample on privacy and retrieve full contact information for anyone who they think *might* have done something that *could* be a violation of a law.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  2. Googling around.. by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I speak Dutch, and searching in google for the seller's name and "postzegels" (Dutch for stamps), I found a thread on the forums of ebay (also in Dutch): http://forums.ebay.nl/thread.jspa?threadID=1000006 05&tstart=120&mod=1093984729600.

    Basically there seem to be some complaints, mainly that the guy is too slow (reads his e-mail once per 10 days), he only accepts US$ and no Euro's, a complaint about conversion rates, and one person on the forum had his stamps delivered with some damages. The seller is a lawyer, so going to court is second nature to him.

    If only he read his e-mail more frequently and tried to be a salesman instead of a lawyer, this would have been unneccessary it seems.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  3. There is no annonimity by a_greer2005 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just like offline, If I call a radio station and slander someone on the air, the radio station and / or the phone company can track it if asked in a legal way, If I post signs on light poles and an officer, or servaelance camera sees me, the company can in court supenas the tape or for the officer to testify, if there is a technical way to provide the tape (i.e. it hasnt been recorded over) and the owner of the tape will not hand it over, that is contempt. What is differant online?