Vista Could Ship Earlier Than Expected
UltimaGuy writes "With speculation of a ship date for Windows Vista ranging in the second part of 2006, word has surprisingly surfaced that it can be expected much earlier. BusinessWeek has received a copy of the internal blog of Chris Jones, who is a top Windows executive. The blog states that the code for Windows Vista will be completed by August 31, giving Microsoft the opportunity to place Vista on PCs for the 2006 Christmas season."
Just in time for Santa, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy..............
"TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
a top Realm employee has revealed that the first copy of DukeNukem Forever will be posted with Vista...
Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
Or else you might have to have some string on hand for -
Oh, wait. Wrong Microsoft product. My bad.
52 Weeks, 52 Religions with John Hummel
All of the previous comments were submitted by members who joined Slashdot, apparently, within a few minutes or days at most of each other.
Check out the members' numbers: if this were poker, it would be a straight-flush.
1.(#14127838)
2.(#14127840)
3.(#14127841)
4. (#14127843)
5.(#14127845)
6.(#14127850)
And all were posted within two minutes or so of each other. What are the odds?
And one or all of him, apparently, has moderator points, and is modding himself up.
Perhaps there is a way to prevent Slashdot giving multiple accounts to jerkoffs.
Oh give me a break. Code complete. this thing will sing through QA. I'm telling you, Windows Vista will be the most perfect work of man since the Septuagint translation, and those guys had the advantage of only a 72-person dev team!
There will be no bugs or security problems. And if there are any, well Microsoft can always postpone Christmas. They've done it before, haven't they?
obviously the articals' release date was later then expected, maybe someone wanted to ensure the quality of the information presented... which i cant say is true for the subject at hand ...
Yes you are missing something. When the release was sheduled at the second half of 2006, nobody actually ever expected it to come out before 2010. 2006 is earlier than expected!
Mr Anonymous Coward, your "member number" also appears to be convienently close to the previous comments, are you involved with this conspiracy?
the working name of Service Pack 3? :-)
That which does not kill her only prolongs my agony.
Which of the 7 different versions will ship first ?
bæ8Ã0sÃOE?5r©oÂÃ?âz:ÃÃAÃ?ÃOEÂ6fXÃ?]Â
It's strange: I have refreshed the page several times, but the foot icon does not appear...
My other post is a First.
I was wondering if everybody else was blind, stupid or crazy. I see that I was not alone.
I mean, that's worse than getting a pair of socks.
I can only hope that, as a /. reader, you're aware that Vista *is* Longhorn :-)
Code complete August 2006?
Shipped October 2006?
Quality assurance testing begins early 2007?
Microsoft ends support early 2014?
Last bug patched early 2014?
Yup, par for the course for Windows 2005.
Fanatically anti-fanatical
Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle