Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Autodesk Embracing Open Source

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the fun-with-snowball-effects dept.

Seba writes to tell us that Autodesk appears to be embracing open source with the recent donation of their web mapping technology to the open source community. From the article: "A snapshot of the MapServer Enterprise source code is available today through the new MapServer Foundation, an independent non- profit organization with the mission of supporting and promoting open source web mapping. The foundation's charter members include MapServer Technical Steering Committee members, the University of Minnesota MapServer Project, the DM Solutions Group, and Autodesk."

35 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Autocad by dduardo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great, so when are we going to see a native Linux port of Autocad?

    1. Re:Autocad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's sad that there is so much empty repetitive discussion about comment moderation..

    2. Re:Autocad by ZoTo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not until they can get out of their API agreement with Micro$oft which stipulates that that AutoCAD must not be ported to any OS other than Micro$oft and even then, must be a currently supported OS (no DOS, Win9x, etc). Prior to this agreement, AutoCAD was ported to Mac and Sun as well as the DOS/Win3.x platform.

    3. Re:Autocad by shione · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Proof that such an agreement exists please. (an online article would suffice). Autocad is the only program thats keeping me on XP and I would be peeved that they're not allowed t port it over to other OSes. I remember prior to r12 Autocad came with a dozen or so different exes.

    4. Re:Autocad by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hummmmm. That makes no sense. While there are a number of specialized cad packages that are used in various industries (Mentor Graphics, Catia, etc), they have held more than 50% of the general cad market, and I would bet more than 75% of MS market, for a long time.

      Why would Autocad sign an agreement like that? In addition, why would MS sign it? These days, MS avoids anything on paper or e-mail (MS: we lost all of our backups of those e-mails that concerned this case; Judge, you know that we get virus just like you. ). And had they signed an agreement prior to the monopoly trial, it would have been used as evidence against them.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:Autocad by similar+to+mh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If by "cheered for blindly" you mean "lambasted by anti-Sony articles for a straight week after the rootkit debacle", then yes, you're quite right.

      Ignoring the whole "slashdot is one person!" fallacy, has it EVER been popular opinion here to like Sony? I don't know, maybe a good while ago, but as far as I can remember their cartel arm has always been hated, and that arm's been twisting the electronics arm resulting in DRM-laden products, and their products have mostly been shoddy anyway.

      Oh, and I despise the Playstation, and the Xbox. Don't like the Gamecube much, though the Revolution looks rather promising. So I took your comment as a personal affront, which I shouldn't have, since it's just a troll.

    6. Re:Autocad by kubrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I must have missed the antitrust lawsuits aimed at stopping Sony's illegal exploitation of its monopoly status in the game console market.

      Oh, that's right. There weren't any. Unlike Microsoft and personal computers.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  2. A little too late? by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this perhaps in response to GMaps being so widely used by various web applications out there? It seems like everyone these days is using GMaps integration (Dodgeball (duh), crime statistics (as seen on Slashdot), frappr, etc).

    I don't have access to anything done by AutoDesk, but is it as viable a platform as GMaps?

    1. Re:A little too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Go and get the code at:

      http://www.mapserverfoundation.org/

    2. Re:A little too late? by Bj�rn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Interestingly I just heard about the MapServer Project yesterday. The person talking about it was very enthusiastic. More info can be found here. A snippet:

      MapServer is an OpenSource development environment for constructing spatially enabled Internet-web applications. The software builds upon other popular OpenSource or freeware systems including Shapelib, FreeType, Proj.4, GDAL/OGR. MapServer will run where most commercial systems won't or can't, on Linux/Apache platforms. MapServer is known to compile on most versions of UNIX/Linux, Microsoft Windows and even MacOS.

      --
      Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
    3. Re:A little too late? by pagameba · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is actually completely different. Google Maps is a javascript API that allows you to integrate maps into your web-based apps. Its very cool. But you don't control the server side of this, the data it uses, nor can you change the source of the app. ADSK's software is full set of both server and client side code that you can use and deploy without restriction (okay, with restrictions of the LGPL) and use for whatever purpose (commercial, personal etc). Google has legal restrictions on the use of their API.

    4. Re:A little too late? by 2short · · Score: 3, Informative

      "...but is [MapGuide] as viable a platform as GMaps?"

      Is Picassa as viable as Photoshop? I'm not saying Picassa or GMaps are bad, because they are both quite good; but they're just not targeting the same functionality level as Photoshop or MapGuide.

      Google Maps is cool, but it has a long way to go before it is a MapGuide competitor. GM is certainly superior if you want to do something quick and easy, but if you want to run the server, control all the data shown on the map and the presentation, tie it into your databases, Google maps isn't what you want. MapGuide is.
          That said, I'm sure GMaps and MS MapPoint have something to do with this decision. They are taking over (and expanding) the low end of web based mapping, leaving MapGuide with the high end (which was previously all there was). Autodesk can see that eventually Google Maps etc. will grow in capability and begin to threaten it. Now people who are pushing what GMaps can do, or want to go a little beyond it can use MapGuide, and still not have to pay.
          Note that ADesk is not giving away MapGuide Author. You don't really need it to use the rest, or to do simple stuff. But it is pretty nice, and those of us doing really high end web mapping will still pay for it.

          Basically, this move tells me someone at ADesk is smarter than I thought. They are opening up stuff that has free competitors while those free competitors are still way behind. Makes sense. If people are going to use something free, it's still better to have them use yours.

    5. Re:A little too late? by imidan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big deal about web mapping services for GIS shops is whether or not they work with the back end systems. In my state, more than 90% of the state, county, and local GIS departments run on ESRI software for their actual data services, so for them, putting data on the web with ESRI's ARCIMS web software is an easy way to go. Unfortunately, ESRI software is massively expensive. Fortunately, you can buy it in modules, so the web service is seperate from the database. Government agencies at all levels could probably benefit from open source web mapping tools, as long as those tools are compatible with the back end. Another very popular open source GIS web application is UMN's MapServer.

  3. Cool by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No need to bash them or to compare their offer with gmaps... If it it good enough, it will stand on its own merits. If it is not, it will still depend on developer effort paid by Autodesk.

    Anyway, the more people benefit from this, the better for all of us.

    --
    http://www.dieblinkenlights.com
    1. Re:Cool by Davorama · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of the good stuff is not showcased for some odd reason.

      If you want to compare to google start with ka-map at http://ka-map.maptools.org/ but that's not the only interesting things going on.

      And realize that with these tools you get to render your own layers, not just lay data over google's background (maybe I'm not totally up on what all you can do with google's API though). Google has changed the web based GIS quite a bit but before them, mapserver was the best FOSS way to do it by far and it's still the way to do stuff where you need real control.

      --

      Davo -- Free speech, free software, AND free beer.

  4. Title is completely wrong by digitect · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The chances of AutoDesk embracing open source or anything like it is about as likely as their chief business cooperative, Microsoft.

    Everyone who is familiar with AutoCAD knows that AutoDesk is quick to embed any latest Microsoft technology and does everything in their power to de-stabilize their existing user base. Between file version issues and various Desktop modules, AutoCAD has become a house of cards that can now be replaced only by their recent Revit purchase. (Of course, before the purchase, they promised the user base that Desktop was the future--pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.) The entire product line has become an upgrade train, and since all their mid-range competitors have been squashed, no one can get off.

    This is quite sad because AutoCAD used to work on Unix. Much of the infrastructure still exists. (The archaic double-backslash or single forward slash path separators, for example.) Fortunately, the situation is so bad that there are many competing efforts to topple them. It will take some time, but an Open Source alternative could be derived from an emulator solution (IntelliCAD), a ground-up project (PythonCAD), a "ported" Apple solution, or an existing mature product (Cycas).

    But I am certain the title of this article is completely upside-down.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:Title is completely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Totally agree.

      It's really sad that Autodesk has gone from a stereotypical underdog -- a dozen guys in a garage struggling against the odds to make a CAD program that would work on an ordinary desktop PC -- to a cash-grabbing, customer-raping near-monopoly that would make even Microsoft blush with some of their underhanded sales tactics.

      Like this year's kick in their customers' teeth: "Buy Inventor, even if you're not ready for 3D yet, because we're giving it away really cheap as we retire AutoCAD 2002." Then, less than a month after the end of that promotion: "Inventor is now a subscription-only package. If you ever want an upgrade, you'll have to pay backdated subscription fees to the date when you purchased the Inventor package... and guess what? Because you bought AutoCAD 2006 as part of the Inventor package, you can never upgrade AutoCAD again without paying the exorbitant Inventor subscription fees."

      True story. They sucked their customers in, then they rammed them right up the Hershey Highway. An open source alternative cannot come too soon.

    2. Re:Title is completely wrong by optimus2861 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "It will take some time, but an Open Source alternative could be derived"

      I wish you were right, but I just don't see how. I don't believe the intersection of AutoCAD power users (primarily engineers and architects) and Open Source coders capable of writing an AutoCAD-like application (top-notch developers) is anywhere near large enough to take this on. There is virtually no "home user" base for AutoCAD, and developers who aren't also power users are going to have little appreciation for the kinds of things that an AutoCAD replacement would have to do. This isn't something you can hack together in a few months and start getting those engineers & architects switching to. It's got to be top-notch, polished, have all the needed features right away, and near-flawless cross-compatibility before any of the pros will even give it a look. And if you don't have the pros, you don't have anybody.

      As an engineer who does some AutoCAD work, I have to say I really think Autodesk's domination in the CAD field is even more than Microsoft's in either operating systems or office suites.

  5. From the mouth of Autodesk... by cutecub · · Score: 4, Interesting

    KQED FM's Forum program had Marcia Sterling, senior vice president, general counsel and secretary of Autodesk on their program recently.

    The discussion covered Intellectual Property in information technology.

    I'd be willing to bet, based on Marcia's responses during the discussion, that Autodesk is definately NOT embracing open source.

    Also represented on the program was the EFF and Stanford Law School.

    Link to Nov 21 Forum broadcast

    -S

  6. Re:Alright, the gloves are coming off. by dsyu · · Score: 2, Funny

    The next person to mention open source is going get a can of whop-ass opened up on them

    So, is the act of opening the can of whoop-ass what results in an ass-kicking? Or is it the
    contents of the can of whoop-ass?

    For example, is it better to say, "Time to open a can of whoop-ass", or "Time to open a can of whoop-ass on you"?

  7. Autodesk open Source by publicStatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Notice anyone missing?

  8. Re:DWG DXF open formats? by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Informative

    DXF has published spec, there are commercial apps such as Able Graphic Manager (and others, try googling something like "dxf bitmapped converter"), there are also converters for AutoCAD's own native DWG format to other vector formats. I myself find it best to just do screenshots of rendered models and drawings, better looking than any converter since there's just too many variables going to an extremely complex vector CADD file to bitmaps formats.

  9. Warning: The Following is not a publicity stunt... by Chaffar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    At the end of the article:

    "Autodesk, Inc. is wholly focused on ensuring that great ideas are turned into reality. With over seven million users, Autodesk is the world's leading software and services company for the building, manufacturing, infrastructure, digital media, and wireless data services fields. Autodesk's solutions help customers create, manage, and share their data and digital assets more effectively. As a result, customers turn ideas into competitive advantage by becoming more productive, streamlining project efficiency, and maximizing profits."

    This article was not written, endorsed, and paid for by Autodesk,Inc.http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=adsk&d=t . This article provides objective opinions. We are your friends...

    Why should an article finish with a paragraph of marketing b*llsh*t? I mean, if you're going to pay a guy to write a nice article for you, shouldn't he at least try to not make it so obvious? Or is it just standard practice nowadays?

  10. OpenAutoCAD? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about an open source app, or just a nonpriced app, that can import AutoCAD files, edit them, and export AutoCAD?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. Speaking as an 11 years Autodesk client... by Bullfrog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Autodesk is rapidly becoming a software rental company. Owning an AutoCAD license outright is possible, but upgrade pricing is more than their subscription pricing and every release you fall behind basically doubles the fee to upgrade. Once you are about 3 releases behind your permanent license reaches its "end of life" and is no longer upgradable, so you are forced to relicense the program at full fee if you want the latest version. Sometimes you are forced into the latest version by industry pressure. AutoCAD no longer writes to R14 format, only R12 DXF! So for the thousands and thousands of R14 users out there, open your cheque books and get with the program! Get new software! Stay current! Relearn (or ignore) the exciting new features. Oh, and you'll need new hardware too...

    What Autodesk are very, very good at is making money. They will not give up their upgrade gravy train, nor grant any rights to consumers that would disrupt that revenue stream. To keep their user base in line they have introduced the subscription model for upgrades. Skip subscription for a year or two and try to get back on and you'll be up for each year you skipped PLUS late fees. Stay on the subscription-go-round and you get a brand spanking new release every year, complete with MAJOR bugs and bloatware features like .NET integration. But guess what? You can only register and use the current version, so if it's out, you get it, and HAVE to use it. Too bad it may be bug-ridden and s-l-l-l-o-o-o-w-w-w, let alone not work properly with your customisations.

    To placate customers who are irrate at being force to use the current version, Autodesk graciously allow subscription clients to license the immediate previous release, but only while it remains the immediate previous release. Once a new release is out, you have to move up to the next previous release (which may or may not work with your customisations, etc.) If you require the use of any previous release they will, at their sole discretion, grant you temporary licenses to use a previous release (usually for 3-6 months at a time).

    And they wonder why piracy and abuse of their licensing is rife...

    Bullfrog

  12. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe people should do a little homework before [submitting,posting] and article... MapServer has been open source ever since the Univ Minnesota started it back in 1996. The story isn't that Autodesk is releasing a closed source software to the OSS community, it's that they are backing an open source software and community.

    I've been using MapServer for several years now, running it happily on various versions of RedHat, and lately a CentOS Linux box.

  13. If they're embracing open source... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they're so serious about open source, why don't they GPL the code for AutoCAD? Just kidding, I know they wouldn't do that. But I do wish they'd release a version for the Mac. AutoCAD, SolidWorks, and Mastercam are the only applications that keep us using Windows here. The rest of our work is done with free software or in-house software, which has, over the years, migrated from DOS machines to Windows machines to Linux and FreeBSD, and now, to the Mac, and with commercial software that has either a Linux or a Mac version. If only those three powerhouse applications worked on the Mac, there would be NO MICROSOFT SOFTWARE in this company!

  14. Re:DWG DXF open formats? by shibashaba · · Score: 2, Informative

    Openoffice can read them, and most any cad software. Like the other poster said though, there's a lot of variables and from my experience if it's an extremely complicated file you'll probably have to try a lot of different software to get it imported the way you want. Of course, I was using a raster to bitmap converter on high resolution graphics, so that may have been why I was having some issues getting programs to import them well. :) I did get better results with autocad files than some of the other formats the program could generate.

    --
    ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
  15. I thought MapServer already was Open Source by ngunton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could someone please enlighten me here? I thought that MapServer already was an Open Source project. In fact, I have played with it some. It is a very nice server-based solution for generating interactive maps. So what is this "announcement" all about really? Wasn't MapServer Open Source already? Is this some kind of takeover of the MapServer project by someone else?

    I don't know much at all about AutoDesk, I am just wondering what's really changed in MapServer land.

    TIA

    1. Re:I thought MapServer already was Open Source by enjahova · · Score: 4, Informative

      MapServer was and is opensource. It was a project at University of Minnesota. What happened here is that a MapServer Foundation was created to oversee the project (like the Apache foundation). Autodesk is financially supporting this.

      The difference is that a more official structure, or foundation if you will, is given to a very necessary project. Now competition in GIS internet mapping should just be between MapServer and ArcIMS, and hopefully MapServer will catchup/surpass ArcIMS soon.

      http://mapserverfoundation.org/

      --
      "how can they call it a MINE if everything here is THEIRS?!?!" -Straight Jacket
  16. CAD Formats by jbengt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would be much more impressed if they just published their file formats and opened them up for interoperability.
    As it is, in an attempt to force upgrades, they no longer support saving to their own file formats when those formats are more than a few years old. And they change the formats almost every year. And they've even started adding weak encryption in places for no reason other than to make the format harder to reverse engineer.

  17. Re:Fedora Core 3 - build problem by emidln · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, xerces is an xml parser if memory serves and it looks like it either isn't install, or the makefile thinks it's in a nonstandard place. Did you check the documentation?

  18. I thought I saw a flying pig go by... by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But then I read enough to see that this had nothing to do with Autocad, the .dxf file format, or anything that would Especially Good to be more open-source-like.

    Nothing to see here folks, move along now... Surely there's a Lego article you want to read and comment on...

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  19. Better article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article provides a more neutral point of view of this move. It also has some opinions from the other parties involved.

  20. Qcad by jwhal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anybody with any kind of (good) programming experience should be contributing to Qcad - make it do the things that Autodesk Land Desktop can do!!! If I could program, I would help. But I can't program worth a dime!!!