RIAA vs Linux and DVDs

PlayfullyClever writes "The entertainment industry has put itself on the fast-track to destruction, using well-proven tactics as explained in Preventing DVD Playback on Linux Like Prohibition in the 1920's. Are their heavy-handed tactics to lock up and control everything we touch signs of plain old human stubborness?" Or more likely- greed.

Comments

Who's doing what to whom when how?

[fembots]

I did read the friendly article but couldn't quite connect RIAA with Linux and DVDs.

There's no mention of RIAA/music/movie in the article, and hardly any mention of Linux.

So what's happening now? Is it some kind of bullets, leathers and baked beans? Someone please enlighten me.

Re:Who's doing what to whom when how?

[Golias]

Prohibition in the 1920s was actually very successful at preventing DVD playback on Linux, so I guess the thinking is that it's a pretty good model to go with.

Unfortunately, it's kinda tricky:

Step One: Don't invent the DVD yet.

Step...

D'oh!

Re:Who's doing what to whom when how?

[sd_diamond]

I do know that the open-source liquor industry has gone way downhill since Prohibition was lifted.

Fear more than greed

[Shadow Wrought]

The executives making the decisions don't understand the technology and have fortunes built upon the success of Brittney Spears. They are trapped by their own business models and the only way out is something not only new and unproven but something that they can't wrap their brains around. Net result: fear. Fear of failure, destitution, and the loss of everything they have gained on the work of others. Fear.

Re:Fear more than greed

[capt.Hij]

I have to disagree with this. This is about power. The record companies want to dictate how you use their product. They cannot get over the idea that once you purchase something it no longer belongs to them. This is why they call people "pirates" when they do what they want with their own stuff. Real pirates are thugs who forcibly board other people's property and take control over it which, by the way, is what Sony has done.

Somebody needs to make a video of Sony DRM pirates sailing the intenet sea with Monty Python's tune of the Crimson Permanent Insurance sung in the background...

Re:Fear more than greed

[curunir]

While I agree that this is all about power, I believe you're confusing who they're trying to exercise power over.

This is not about preventing piracy. It never has been. Every study shows that piracy doesn't cut into the amount of money they make. Those that pirate weren't likely buyers to begin with and some end up becoming buyers because they like what they downloaded and want it in a better form. What this is about is maintaining their hold on the distribution chain. The record labels are the middle men between the consumer and the artists. As technology continues to enable and simplify a direct connection between artists and consumers, the labels become less and less necessary.

By holding these technologies back, what they are really doing is preserving the situation where artists are forced to go through them to be able to reach consumers. They're preserving the situation where they can force onerous contracts on artists that give that result in the labels receiving the vast majority of the profits from music sales. They're preserving the cartel arrangement that allows charging ~$15 for a plastic disc that costs < $0.50 to create. Home studios are already well within the capabilities of many artists and CD manufacturing can be purchased at very reasonable prices. These were once functions that only record labels could offer. Now the only thing they have left is the distribution network. Filesharing and other technologies that allow artists to market directly to their fans will eventually obviate the last function that labels provide and make them completely unncessary.

That's what they're fighting. That's the power they're trying to maintain.

What he say?

[Tackhead]

> The entertainment industry has put itself on the fast-track to destruction,

...it have no chance to survive, make its time?

(Someone had to say it.)

Good analogy

[SlashAmpersand]

TFA states that during Prohibition alcohol consumption fell initially, then rose to heights never before seen. P2P sharing was huge a few years ago. I don't have any data to back this up, but it seems to me that it's taken a pretty big fall. Is there going to be a rise similar to alcohol consumption during Prohibition? On the other hand, I can hardly wait to see Homer the mp3 Baron...

One major flaw in the analogy...

[L0neW0lf]

The article uses Prohibition as a comparison...but Prohibition was not a product of corporate greed. It isn't like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. got together and said "Let's find a way to prohibit alcoholic beverages so that we can control what America REALLY ought to drink --our product!"

Starting with a flawed analogy usually leads to a flawed article --as it did in this case.

Re:Learn to preview.. .

[brufar]

The RIAA - Hollywood - DRM - Linux Suicide Pact

New DVDs that block use in computers

[acherrington]

I was at blockbuster the other day and rented the Longest Yard, then took it home. Much to my suprise, the DVD blocked the watching of the movie on my computer. I took the DVD to blockbuster, and told them that I was cancelling my blockbuster pass because I was unable to watch movies on my computer (I have no normal TV as everything is ran through the computer using beyond TV). I figured that should put the most pressure on the MPAA. If blockbuster lobbies against MPAA because their revenue basis is dried up, it should make a good battle where only consumers win... i hope.

DMCA vs. Prohabition passage

[Cr0w T. Trollbot]

our brilliant government passed the Eighteenth Amendment commonly referred to as Prohibition.

It is misleading to say "our brilliant government" passed Prohabition. It would be more accurate to say "our brilliant GOVERNMENTS" passed Prohibition, as it required a 2/3rds majority of votes in both the House and Senate, as well as being ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. Grave mistake though it was, Prohabition was still an issue whose passage was sufficiently popular to overcome the step hurdles against amending the constitution.

The DMCA, by contrast, has shown no such popular support, and did not go through nearly as rigerous a process or well-debated to be enacted into law. That's a rather fundamental difference, and one that renders his anaology to inexact to be meaningful, if not his overriding point.

Crow T. Trollbot

Re:RIAA sanctioned linux playback

[cayenne8]

"...if the lack of a player were really the reason Linux users have to rip a DVD..."

I think you have 2 issues confused here. In Linux, you do NOT have to rip the dvd to watch it. However, before the DVD encryption scheme was cracked...you could not use your computer's dvd player to watch your perfectly legally purchased dvds. DVD Jon broke the encryption scheme...and now, dvd players on Linux boxes can do the exact same thing that someone using OSX or Win. can do with their purchased media.

The ease in ripping the dvd's was just a side effect from having the encryption broken. But, you can rip a DVD on any OS...not just Linux.

Re:Open Source Beer

[sd_diamond]

THIS RECIPE LICENSED UNDER THE GPL.

Great. Now I won't be able to drink it while using MS Word.