IE Flaw Utilizes Google Desktop Search
abscondment writes "An error in the way Internet Explorer parses CSS files has been discovered by Matan Gillon of Israel. The flaw can be exploited by any website, and used to access personal information via Google's Desktop Search program. Of course, Google contends that this is a flaw with IE, and not their search software."
I am shocked to learn of this, shocked and dismayed.
Will this be the flaw that breaks the patch cycle's back?
Puh-lease. This ridiculous question could be asked of any flaw. How about from the 'its 5pm lets leave early so we accept any sensationalist submission' department?
I can see how the Slashbot must suffer over this - its Google, but its a security vulnerability, but its Microsoft, so its OK, but its still Google, so what do we do? Laugh, cry, sell stock?
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
Here is the easiest way to stop this from hurting you:
Turn off your computer.
P.S. Okay, seriously, use Firefox.
Dashboard Widgets
So it's finally happened. Microsoft's first salvo against Google. What else could it be?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
This makes me wonder if Ballmer's chair throwing scream was actually "I will f##king end Google Desktop!" instead of "...end Google on the desktop."
Hmm...
I wish I knew of this sooner
Who's who?
You are all a bunch of idots.
spyware gets access to your computer's resources. Doh.
The bug is that it uses IE in the first place.
--The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
You know where my house is?
After the next security update, all cookies created by IE will be prefixed with $sys$.
Its an awesome feature for Developers! Developers! Developers! - This feature has been in IE at least since IE 6 came out. That means Microsoft is again leading the field when it comes to AJAX and Web2.0 products.
Think of the awesome client-side applications people will be able to come up with now that they are no longer restricted by pesky cross-domain security policies!
Google's on first.
Is calling somebody a "jew" supposed to be an insult or something in your book? If ones calls a human a "human", or an american an "american", isn't this just simply stating the obvious? Calling a person who isn't a jew, a "jew", simply because they find anti-semitic comments offensive, would be an ignorant and silly thing to do. "Human", "american", "chinese" and "jew", neither of these are insults.
Shut up, fag! And what's wrong with Chinese, are you racist?