Slashdot Mirror


IBM To Support OpenDocument Next Year

An anonymous reader writes "IBM announced this weekend that early next year it will begin supporting the OpenDocument standard in its WorkPlace line of products. They're planning on pushing this widely accessible format and their products in developing nations." From the article: "Rather than create an analog to Microsoft Office, IBM is offering editors for creating documents, spreadsheets or presentations within a Web browser. Documents are delivered via a Web portal and stored in shared directories. Access control and document management tools allow people to share and edit documents with others. Until now, Workplace supported the formats from open-source product OpenOffice, from which the OpenDocument was derived. Workplace Managed Client software also can read, write and edit documents created with Microsoft Office."

6 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Good Move... by TarrySingh · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's time somwe heavy weights actuallt DID something in that regards.

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  2. Good for Open Document format by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sun support, Novell support, Google and many many less-known software vendors supports. Now you can add IBM support and see that Open Document can become a huge success.

    You can read OpenOffice.org developpers' blog to see many simillar stories of companies or organizations adopting opendocument standard.

    1. Re:Good for Open Document format by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1, Informative

      XML files are by themselves somewhat open, but the issue comes in to play when you put in binary information in your XML file. This is what Microsoft is doing with their next version of Office. They will NOT make those binary files open to the public and thus they still will have a vendor lock in type of situation.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
  3. Re:Web 2.0. by Bifacial · · Score: 2, Informative

    My friend - I really do work in marketing ;) Political marketing, btw ;) To the point: I mean that Web transforms. Slowly, but transforms. Web content is moving away from 'content' and more into 'application'. Just compare, for example, early Yahoo and Google. Early Yahoo is man-made list of links; Google is program for labelling sites with PageRanks and showing them to consumer. Compare early advertising programs and AdSense - AdSense works without any human input. ODF allows for web document editing - first stage of web applications; after mailers and task engineers; but before imaging programs and full-fledged Internet OSes. Is it contentful enough?

    --
    bifacial [bifeishel] - n., Lat. 1) Having two faces...
  4. Open Document Format != Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This misconception is not helped by the presence of Tux at the top of this report. /. should know better.

    ODF is a format for saving documents. It is platform independent and there is no reason why it should not be used by any application that creates documents, whether open or closed source.

  5. Actually, this isn't a Web browser implementation by Dutchmang · · Score: 5, Informative

    One error in the report is that it's a Web-based implementation. It's actually an Eclipse-based implementation. The container for the ODF-compliant editors is IBM Workplace Managed Client. The container itself is a very interesting thing because it lets you build applications of just about any type, which are then deployed with the client over the network (or added to existing deployed clients as the case may be.) It also runs unmodified across Windows and Linux, because the Eclipse/Workplace layer does all the interaction with the OS windows, file system etc.

    The point about the ODF support is that, like all standards, it takes interoperability out of the equation and lets vendors compete on the implementations. OpenOffice is essentially a MS Office competitor, using the same desktop-centric deployment and support model, except with open source and cross-OS capabilities. This is good for folks who like the MS Office "way" but want choice. IBM is approaching the problem of desktop productivity tools a little differently, as a locally installed but network managed app. Again, innovating in the implementation because the standard lets you do that.

    --
    I'm looking over the wall, and they're looking at me!