Slashdot Mirror


Lack of 'Mirror Neurons' Linked to Autism

FruFox writes "A recent study has pointed to a possible link between autism and lack of so-called 'mirror neurons' , either physically or functionally. This provides the first solid physical evidence to back up the theory that autism's root cause is a profound lack of empathy. This probably impacts the world of Asperger's Syndrome as well. Many Slashdot readers are undoubtedly familiar with the world of Asperger's / autism."

89 comments

  1. Schizophrenia by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is there a link between these 'mirror neurons' and schizophrenia? Schizophrenia and autism are very similar in symptoms and epidemiology. Indeed, many researchers I know (unofficially) call autism "juvenile schizophrenia."

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:Schizophrenia by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While there are similarities in the two disorders (as well as with Asperger's) the tag "juvenile schizophrenia" is misleading, as Autism is not restricted to children.

      That being said, further research into this pattern (such as to determine if there is an impact on schizophrenia) is of interest. As an aspie, I'm greatly appreciative of any information that can help me deal with the cards I've been dealt.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Schizophrenia by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been suggested. From the abstract to a paper by Arbib and Mundhenk, Schizophrenia and the mirror system: an essay (2005):

      We suggest that verbal hallucinations occur when an utterance progresses through verbal creation pathways and returns as a vocalization observed, only to be dismissed as external since no record of its being created has been kept. Schizophrenic patients on this theory then confabulate the agent.
      Interesting stuffs.
      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    3. Re:Schizophrenia by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The articles I linked to elsewhere in this discussion imply that Aspergers affects one section of the brain, but High and Low Functioning Autism affects two. I suggested there that this might mean that there are two independent mechanisms at play here, where those with Aspergers has one specific one and those with Autism have both.


      I got to thinking though that this would mean you'd have to have some OTHER condition in which only the second of those mechanisms was present. I don't know what the research says on this, but is it possible that the second mechanism on its own is responsible for schizo-effective disorders (of which schizophrenia is the most serious)?


      (This still means that Aspergers and Autism fall on the same spectrum, but would imply that HFA and LFA are Aspergers with a schizo-effective element. That doesn't sound right, but if that is NOT the case, we're looking at THREE independent mechanisms being involved in autism - at least - and I'm even less happy with the idea of having more variables than absolutely necessary to explain it.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Schizophrenia by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      That's a very interesting take on the three disorders in discussion. I haven't had a chance to follow your links yet, but you've given me a lot to think about (and to discuss with my doctor). Thanks for that.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:Schizophrenia by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      I've now followed the links (had to skim a couple). Very interesting indeed. I'd have to say that one of the most frustrating things about Asperger's is having the cognitave ability to understand what's happening, but being unable to stop it through force of will. Probably now after my insurance kicks over to my new parent company after the first of the year, I'll finally pursue actually getting some kind of treatment, now that I have a fair idea that it won't turn me into a flatline.

      Thanks again for the info.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    6. Re:Schizophrenia by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Not a problem. I'm Asperger's myself - hence a lot of MY curiosity! :) There are a number of theories - and therefore a number of treatment approaches - out there, but now that actual mechanism data seems to exist, pdocs might have a better idea of how to approach Asperger's.


      In my case, it's a little confused since I have a mild seizure disorder AND have been diagnosed bipolar as well. However, the treatment I'm on for those does seem to mitigate the negative side of Aspergers some. However, without a baseline fMRI and an on-meds fMRI (plus an expert in this field), I have no hard data on that. It could equally well be that the other stuff aggravated whatever the Asperger mechanism is.


      The extensive research going on is excellent - I'm surprised it took so long for them to use fMRI, I would have thought that one obvious, although I've been told in the past by my own doctor that fMRI couldn't possibly show anything up. Clearly they were wrong on that. (* Gloat *)


      Some more information for the obsessive:



      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Schizophrenia by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      How do you know if you're a dyslexic schizophrenic?

      You always think that you're following someone.

      ba-dum-bum.

      Sorry.. it's just a joke!

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    8. Re:Schizophrenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont think so - the most compelling scientific theorum i have read for schizophrenia is unfocussed semantic activation in the right hemisphere of the brain. i would argue the aetiolgies for autism and schizophrenai are really quite different. most schizophrenics can empathise with other people.

  2. Good by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The closer we get to a biological cause of autism, the sooner we can debunk Aspergers.

    I'm kidding myself though, they'll just say it must not have the same cause because the people with so-called Aspergers won't show the biological symptom.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Good by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The closer we get to a biological cause of autism, the sooner we can debunk Aspergers.

      Can you explain this a bit more?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Good by orgelspieler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      At first I just thought this was flame-bait. So I read the Wikipedia article on Asperger syndrome. I was surprised to find out that I apparently meet the DSM-IV definition. Hell, half of my friends meet either the DSM-IV criteria. Seeing as half of the requirements are basically not having other impairments, it's not surprising. The Gillberg criteria are a little more specific, but are no more useful. They seem to describe just about any Slashdotter, including orgelspieler

      Let's see:

      • lack of desire to interact with peers (OK... depends on how you define "interact" and "peers")
      • lack of appreciation of social cues (any married man has this problem)
      • repetative adherence to a narrow interest (pipe organs)
      • superficially perfect expressive language (grammar facist)
      • formal, pedantic language (hey look, a dupe!)
      • misinterpretations of literal/implied meanings (jokes going over heads)
      • peculiar, stiff gaze (at the computer screen)
      • motor clmusienss

      Yup, that's me.

    3. Re:Good by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that is my objection to it. The diagnostic criteria, even when correctly applied, are questionably overbroad.

      Once you count in all the self-diagnoses, it's a mess. Kuro5hin did a poll and something like 78% of the respondants claimed to have Aspergers. Not scientific but take it for what it's worth.

      One has to keep in mind the psychiatrist often has no way to run a test to see if you have something, they go solely on what you tell them your problem is. Sure they can observe your behavior as you meet with them, but if you seem a little quirky or socially awkward they aren't going to second guess your self-diagnosis.

      It's the same with parents and kids, the psychiatrist isn't going to often second guess someone that spends at least 8 hours a day, every day, supervising their kids, based on a 1 hour session.

      That's why I think nailing down biological causes to these disorders is especially important. That way the people with real disorders get recognized, and the attack on our subculture can end.

      It's not wrong to be a geek. We are not sick. Don't buy into their lies.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Good by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yes, see my other post in this same thread.

      The short version is I view aspergers as yet another attack on the intelligent. Just as gay people were treated for their "disease", they seek to call being a geek or nerd a disease now.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Good by crazyphilman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "It's not wrong to be a geek. We are not sick. Don't buy into their lies."

      Thank GOD! Finally someone said it.

      It was bad enough back in the eighties, when I had to go through High School huddled in the hallway with my three friends (all of us were physics nerds) while popular-type assholes swung by trying to one-up each other, making fun of us.

      And it was annoying when all of us engineering majors in college had to put up with shit all the time because business and liberal-arts majors treated us like we were some weird other species. I mean, god forbid we crack open the hood of our car and (gasp!) change a freakin' alternator for twenty bucks at the part shop instead of laying out two hundred to have a fat, sweaty, greasy guy do it for us (and make a mess of the wire connections! Don't these people have electrical tape???).

      But, these days, every five minutes some psychologist schmuck is trying to play all phony-sympathetic with us, laying some story on us about how we're all "suffering" from some weirdo "syndrome" and we're all really "autistic" and so on.

      HEY! SHRINKS OF THE WORLD! I'm a programmer! I make triple the national average salary, can fix, build, or break more different types of equipment than you know the names of, and I whupped your kid's honor-roll ass at Halo II last night! I'm just fine the way I am, and if you come over here trying to take my crazy away, I'm gonna give you an atomic wedgie, drag your ass in my unkempt bathroom, and give you a swirly for good measure! And I haven't cleaned my toilet in weeks! And I eat at Taco Bell regularly! Begone, go back to bothering the neurotics whose mothers make them dress funny!

      Um... Heh heh. I guess this issue gets me a bit worked up. :)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that the diagnostic criteria leaves a lot to be desired as a method for identifying if you do or do not have Autism/Aspergers. Being able to reliably identify the condition with a biological marker would be good in getting children/adults the assistance needed to make the most of their abilities and minimize their difficulties. I don't understand the thought running through here that this activity is an "attack on our subculture". As a parent of 2 children with Autism and 1 child with Aspergers, I applaud the research efforts such as these as helping to clear away the "static" that is a distraction to my children and inhibit their ability to relate to me, their siblings and those around them. I don't see any competant researcher in this arena "attacking" anyone.

    7. Re:Good by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative
      You should probably be informed that people with Aspergers generally cannot live unassisted. My fiance's brother has Aspergers and lives in an assisted living facility with many others like him. While it seems trendy to self-diagnose with Aspergers ("Misfit socially? That sounds like me!"), the real mental disease is significantly less "being a geek or nerd" (your words) and much more a debilitating mental disorder.

      He is a nice guy - outgoing and cheerful, just like most people with Aspergers. If you talk to him long enough, he simply starts looping over and over about every 20 minutes on the same sequence of subjects. He's very smart -- he can list off the businesses that have occupied any given corner or strip mall (and he tends to as you drive around), but he can't find his way home unless it's the same way he drove there.

      People hear that and think "I know somebody like that", or even "that's like me", but don't realize how profound the level of these symptoms are. He speaks about his dead cat in present tense because that's how he always has spoken about her. He literally cannot comprehend that somebody is lying to him. He threw a superbowl party with GI Joe tablecloths because that's how his parties were decorated when he was a little kid.

      People (other than hypochondriacs) never forget where their keys are and then leap to conclude that they have a chronic and fatal disease like ALS. People seldom talk to themselves and then self-diagnose schizophrenia. Lately however, it seems like it has become very trendy in certain geek circle to decide you have Aspergers or a "light case" of Aspergers.

      If they spent time with people living in facilities with legitimately diagnosed Aspergers, they might reconsider their self-diagnosis. You might reconsider it being an "attack on the intelligent" and more of a bizarre confusion regarding what the mental disorder entails.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Good by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you've summed up the problem well, what the diagnosis was intended for and what's it becoming applied to are two different things.

      more of a bizarre confusion regarding what the mental disorder entails.

      I agree it's a confusion, but to me it doesn't seem bizarre, I believe the diagnostic criteria are poorly written and overly broad, to the point where way too many people are getting diagnosed (the wikipedia article for aspergers cites numbers like 7 expected cases per 1000, yet diagnosis rates are shooting up, way up).

      It's not just aspergers, but that one is close to my heart since my chosen lifestyle and my personality almost just fits into what they are calling diagnostic criteria.

      Mental Disorders Strike Nearly Half of All Americans

      Do you really think half of all americans are mentally ill? Discounting certain election-induced mass delusions, I seriously doubt it.

      It's becoming a major industry to create disease where there is none, to make any nonconformity a disease. It's a dangerous cross between commercial interest in pushing designer prescription drugs, and government interest in supressing non-conformity, and removing personal responsibility. Removing responsibility removes freedom.

      It also does a disservice to the truely mentally ill like your brother in law. It clouds the issue of what is and isn't a mental disorder. Him being lumped in with millions of kids with normal behavior problems, and thousands of nerdy adults that want an easy cop-out does not do him any good.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Good by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I'm a programmer! I make triple the national average salary,

      You hit the nail on the head there. Forget H1-B visas, this stuff is being researched so that they can make more of us to bring our wages down and put us back into the underclass.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:Good by Jhon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Aspergers. Things like "misinterpretations of literal/implied meanings" are often misattributed qualities of scale. Someone can be "literal", but still be a neurotypical.

      My wife can ask me to do a simple task -- such as "Please put Nicole's shoes on" (she's our 3 year old daughter). If I don't stop, rewind the tape in my head and THINK -- I respond to what she SAID. Not what she meant. I'll say: "Her shoes wont fit me". It should be painfully obvious to an NT what my wife is asking -- to take my daughters shoes and have my daughter wear them. But not necessarily to someone with Asperger's. I had to LEARN the difference and it does NOT come naturally to me.

      Here's the "twist". This "literal/implied meaning" problem with *ME* ONLY applies to auditory language. NOT to written language. In fact, much of the 'courtship' of my wife was done in writing (I can write some pretty romantic stuff, too... at least enough to get one hell of a foxy chick to marry a misfit like me -- heh).

      Other symptoms can also be of various degrees, such as "stimming". My need to stim is very powerful. It manifests itself as constant foot or toe movement. Not really observable with my shoes on and not very socially distracting. I even do it in my sleep. It used to drive my wife crazy, but she got used to it.

      Obsessions can be particularly debilitating. Mine are fairly benign (history -- early US history in particular but I have a fondness of early European history, too). I also have a few others, but as long as I can spend an hour or two a day pursuing them, I'm satisfied and I can function. If I don't, I have a PHYSICAL reaction. I can't think straight. I cant function and I start to babble about the subject to anyone (even myself) and I can be quite an insufferable bore to be around. Who the eff cares about a particular topic discussed between Adams and Jefferson in letters exchanged in the twilight of their lives? I mean, other than me?

      But you are and the GP are right, many "self diagnosed" Asperger's are really NTs. It was once suggested to me that we're ALL "on the spectrum" to some degree or another and I can kind of see this. But if you put a bunch of professionally diagnosed AS with the self-diagnosed -- trust me... you'll see a difference.

    11. Re:Good by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a daughter who falls into this category... what you might not realize is that these traits apply ALL THE TIME and they are a bit more severe than you're probably giving credit for.

      For example, "lack of appreciation of social cues" does not mean that you were oblivious to how turned off your date got as you quoted Monty Python nonstop. My daughter often has trouble telling whether someone is laughing or crying, and has NO ability to figure it out from the context or any surrounding behavior.

      Similarly "repetative adherence to a narrow interest" sounds like a hobby or something you might like doing a little bit more than other people consider normal. That's not even close. My daughter will watch a movie over and over and over again so many times until she can pause it before every line, recite the line, and then listen to it play on the movie.

      Much of this needs to be seen in action to appreciate the actual description of the symptoms. Keep in mind that if it seems to apply to a large group of people, then the behavior that it's trying to describe is more excessive than how you've understood it.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    12. Re:Good by sparkes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An excellent point well made.

      I have aspergers as does my 7 year old son and we couldn't survive day to day life without a lot of support from our loved ones which we don't always acknowledge due to our lack of empathy generally. If it's hard for someone with aspergers it's harder for those that support them and I wouldn't have noticed this without a hell of a lot of help.

      The inability to spot a lie makes life difficult among people who would like to take advantage of me, luckily I have learned the hard way to avoid these people but it led me to live an almost friendless existance for many years until I discovered it was certain types of people that led to my unhappiness.

      I have suffered with depression for years caused by my inability to understand other people. I don't believe I or my son have a problem but the majority of people who lie and accept they are being lied to on a daily basis should probably book themselves into a facility for some care ;-)

      as for the getting lost unless your friend follows the same route both myself and my son are lucky in the fact that we can 'see' maps and know the topology of the surrounding area automatically. Unfortunatly this does make it even harder than normal when we are lost. It's impossible to describe the feelings I have when I don't 'know' where I am in terms I think you could understand this makes it impossible to sleep on journeys.

      Like most people with aspergers I have things that I think should be done in a certain way and my son also has things he likes done in certain ways you can't imagine the clash that happens when these two ideas clash.

      On the positive side I can talk to my son like an adult on some subjects (his maths is excellent) but as a negative he is very late at developing in some areas.

      Certainly in the UK part of the diagnosis is that it 'has' to affect your day to day ability to live unaided.

      geeks aren't generally aspies but aspies are often geeks ;-)

    13. Re:Good by sparkes · · Score: 1
      Other symptoms can also be of various degrees, such as "stimming". My need to stim is very powerful. It manifests itself as constant foot or toe movement. Not really observable with my shoes on and not very socially distracting. I even do it in my sleep. It used to drive my wife crazy, but she got used to it.

      I still drive my partner crazy after ten years with my foot movements so yours is really something special ;-)

      Obsessions can be particularly debilitating.

      I think it's not understanding that other people don't care that make them such a problem.

    14. Re:Good by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    15. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sounds more like a HFA (High Functioning Autistic) than Aspergers. Seriously, do some research. Most Aspies can and do live normal lives. The whole area is very grey. Maybe whoever diagnosed him though that's what Aspergers is. It's a very subjective area that descibes a whole range of Autistic-like disorders.

    16. Re:Good by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I use a GPS unit to find my way home- takes me about 20 trips to actually remember the route, as opposed to the businesses along the route. I was self-diagnosed, but since I fit 10/10 behaviors, when I needed the designation it was easy to become truly diagnosed.

      I disagree with the idea of "debunking" Aspergers- but there is a real need to stop calling it a disease (it's not- it's a slight mental disorder at worst) and institutionalizing people for it (a spouse works as well as an assisted living center would for me). Likewise, I support removing the stereotypical male behaviors from the diagnoses of Asperger's and ADHD- as misdiagnoses are high and boys whose female teachers can't handle basic typical male behavior get drugged in public schools when they really don't need to be.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Good by eronysis · · Score: 1

      Although not the same disease. This is why I would only adopt. I don't feel like giving a unborn child a little genetic surprise he can then "enjoy" for the next 50years. Way to go!
      The way the world is going he will most likely be able to sue you for fathering him anyway, lets hope he at least tries.

    18. Re:Good by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'm calling HR to ask: Just what is the acceptable method of asking for a salary adjustment?

      Here, just write your name and adjusted figure right here and I'll have it fixed within the hour.
      Oh wait, you weren't talking about an upwards adjustment, were you?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    19. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the wikipedia article for aspergers cites numbers like 7 expected cases per 1000
      Good God! Now people are using Wikipedia to back statistics! In fact, 63.2-percent of people do that. I got that number from somewhere on the 'net, so it must be true.
    20. Re:Good by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Actually, I was.

      I'm already quite adept at achieving the downwards adjustment... way down... to zero.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    21. Re:Good by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I just want to register the fact that I disagree with both the poster and the moderation on the post- the political use of such diagnoses is a *very* real concern on both sides of the issue and is not at all "flamebait".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    22. Re:Good by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I don't see any competant researcher in this arena "attacking" anyone.

      It's not the competant researchers that are the problem. Many of us with this have run into the "arrogant NT with power" problem. The type of "normal" person so confident in their own normalcy that any variation in behavior from "normal" by anybody under their power gets referals to psychiatrists and drugs, or negative career assessments. I see it more as a problem with ADHD children than those with Asperger's- and if it wasn't this label, it'd be something else (I personally think we need to label them- I call it the Addams Family Syndrome, after the way that family treated the ouside world- throughout the TV series, they were convinced that the way they lived was normal- it was the rest of the world that was wierd). But yes- this is being used as an attack on those of us with obsessions in a *direct* attempt to reduce our quality of life and make us more manageable by NTs. And the fact that a disportionate number of geeks show some of the behaviors on the list, causes some of the more paranoid-and-in-denial of us to see it as an attack on geekdom itself. Which, given the rounds of cost cutting that have hit our salaries in a negative fashion in the last few years, may well be more than just paranoia and denial.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also trendy among people who KNOW geeks. My brother and I have both been accused of having this condition (my brother by a psychiatrist he was dating and I by my wife). This despite the fact that we have both been through all the sets of diagnostic criteria and found that we are at most just introverted or suffering from a mild form of sensory integration.

      It seems that people are still afraid of anyone who is different, but these days they have more "scientific" ways to "pathologise" those differences.

    24. Re:Good by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
      Wow. Thank you for the insight. I especially appreciate the explanation of the literal/implied meanings. Have you heard of Amelia Bedelia? It reminds me a bit of that. I just had no idea there was something like it in real life.

      I shake my legs a lot, and I have to get my hands on an organ spec from time to time, but I'm not about to diagnose myself with a disorder. Good luck, and I'm glad you're having such success with your condition. I for one wouldn't mind having a good US history lecture every now and then. :-) Plus you could use your literal mindedness to help with word sense disambiguation research, or the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

    25. Re:Good by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      My wife can ask me to do a simple task -- such as "Please put Nicole's shoes on" (she's our 3 year old daughter). If I don't stop, rewind the tape in my head and THINK -- I respond to what she SAID. Not what she meant. I'll say: "Her shoes wont fit me". It should be painfully obvious to an NT what my wife is asking -- to take my daughters shoes and have my daughter wear them. But not necessarily to someone with Asperger's. I had to LEARN the difference and it does NOT come naturally to me.

      Interesting example. The phrase you cite is ambiguous in meaning. In this case, the correct meaning has a deleted indirect object. So, presumably, my brain takes this phrase and sets up a decision tree, each node having a probability assigned to it. It can then quickly prune the tree of such possibilities as "she wants me to put the kid's shoes on" because the probability of that node is 0.01 while the node for "put the kid's shoes on her" is .98. If two nodes were .46 and .52 I'd probably feel confused.

      So, if you can forgive the overly-simplistic model of our brains as a CS exercise, do you think you lack the decision tree, or are your nodes weighted differently, perhaps by a linguistic-closeness model or something else? Or could this lack of mirror neurons simply foul up the scoring mechanism, since something like 'absurdness' involves a degree of empathy?

      Thanks for the interesting post.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    26. Re:Good by Jhon · · Score: 1
      So, if you can forgive the overly-simplistic model of our brains as a CS exercise, do you think you lack the decision tree, or are your nodes weighted differently, perhaps by a linguistic-closeness model or something else? Or could this lack of mirror neurons simply foul up the scoring mechanism, since something like 'absurdness' involves a degree of empathy?
      It's not that I don't have empathy. I have trouble reading people. I find it much easier to figure them out from what they write rather than what they say.

      I've heard this presented as an example: Everyone has a "cup" that holds a certain amount of "stress". For most people, when they are calm and relaxed the cup is empty. For those on the spectrum, at BEST, the cup is already half full.

      Stimming is a "calming" technique that many on the spectrum find naturally. Some chew (clothes, paper, whatever), some rock, some bang their heads. Many can't control it. Some of us who are high-functioning can -- to a certain degree -- either control it or re-direct it on our own. Someone who needs to "chew" can chew gum. Others might need "directing" from others. "Hey, I see you are chewing your sleeve. Here, have some gum". The name of the game is to find something that is either socially acceptable or socially benign. It's not very friendly to ones social standing to constantly twist ones nipple in public (and that *IS* a stim that some autistics exhibit).

      Routine plays in to the "stress" idea. If you KNOW how things are going to be (rigid schedule all planned out), it keeps your "stress cup" from filling up further so you can deal with OTHER things. My need for routine is somewhat minor. I usually park in the same area of every parking lot (north-east corner). I usually drive the same route to work every day (which is NOT the most efficient or fastest, but has the least amount of traffic (again, stress).

      The "literal" mindedness can be part of the need to keep stress down. If presented with ambiguity, time and effort must be put in to figuring out meaning. Almost like trying to solve a complicated math problem (heh... which I actually enjoy and find relaxing -- go figure).

      Added to this, most autistics EXPERIENCE things differently -- or more intensely. Many can not only SEE the flicker of fluorescent lights, but it is an enormous distraction. We can actually feel "pain" when their skin or hair is touched -- even lightly. Think of it like sitting in a very uncomfortable chair in raw burlap clothing, with a strobe light blinking away all day long. Imagine the stress that might put on you after a while.

      The thing that's interesting about me is that my literal mindedness is only auditory. I've a pretty damn good memory and when I say I "replay the tape in my head" I almost mean that literally. I've SORT of adopted a "system" like you suggest, but mine is more "visual". In my head, I rewind the tape, then convert the verbal words to "text".

      I remember a study I read a number of years ago that showed that autistics had MORE neural connections than NTs at a comparable age. The idea presented was that autistics experience DETAIL more intensly and have a much harder time "generalizing" because of this.

      I CAN pass as NT and most people I know aren't aware of me being AS. They just chalk me up as being very "punny" or sarcastic.
    27. Re:Good by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1
      In my case, stimming consists of listening to the radio and television (with occasional glances as needed) while reading one or more texts/screens at a time while I thinking about various things. All at the same time. My brain seems to be multi-track as has been demonstrated in numerous tests that they gave me as a teen. 16-18 from their tests, depending on what form the stimulants were. I rather like it although I do stress out when I do not have multiple inputs and I know for a fact that this behavior drives those around me more than a little nuts.

      Another behavior that bothers those around me is my compulsive classification behavior. While this is great for an economist or musicologist (I have a degree in one and could easily operate as the other), people don't like it when you announce, for instance, the composer, title, and group/orchestra/singer for every piece of music that comes along or flaws in quotations, sources, or statistics complete with citations :-).

      I also have to rewind things here when dealing with spoken words. Give me the written word any day of the week. For some reason, speech is more ambiguous and I have to rewind it, analyze what was said and then determine what actions are required. Every task requires thinking through the actual steps as well as all possible consequences. Fortunately I think very, very fast so most people never notice.

      Last point is that I served in the US Navy for over thirteen years. They knew what they were getting when I joined. During that period I had fantastic (4.0) evaluations save in one area. Military behavior. Gee I wonder why? Still, they didn't want to let me go; that decision was made at the Pentagon by people without a clue.

      Fortunately, my diagnosis was made long before this craze of self-diagnosis or over-diagnosis so I know its real and yes, I do need a lot of support. Still, I rather like what I am as I posted above. It certainly keeps me entertained and there is a place for someone that can connect information in multiple fields especially in these days of the 'net.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    28. Re:Good by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Underclass, hell -- they want to turn us into automatons willing to code all day in return for a pat on the head and a lollipop from the Good Dr. Bendenheaden. If the bug count goes too high, well... It's a straightjacket and electroshock for YOU, young man...

      Before you know it, a giant Indian is throwing the water fountain through the window and your ass is smothered to death.

      Who knew???

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    29. Re:Good by sparkes · · Score: 1

      ho ho ho you twat

      aspergers is only disabling because plonkers like you consider it a 'defect' it's a gift being able to outthink most people so what if I have problems intergrating with your society they pay people like me a shit load to solve the problems your neurotypical brains can't understand.

      I wonder what the Nazi's you share thoughts of genetics with would have made your you and your defects? I'm pretty sure as a blue eyed british gentleman with a blue eyed son and a good scientific brain I wouldn't have ended up in a gas chamber unlike the majority of defectives who share their fucked up ideas.

    30. Re:Good by eronysis · · Score: 1

      Not exactly sure what your trying to say there with the nebulous nazi comments. If you are implying I share any beliefs....well I guess I could be a nazi Jew. I will have to ask my mother;)

  3. layer of abstraction by brother+bloat · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I recall correctly, mirror neurons are associated with imitation and self-visualization. Somehow, this meshes well with the idea of autistics lacking "higher level abstraction" abilities. Specifically, mirror neurons provide a means of abstracting the idea of self. Let me explain.

    I've read that in some parts of the autistic brain, "layers" of neurons are connected directly to each other, such that every neuron in a particular layer is connected to every other neuron in the next layer. However, in normal brains, a third layer exists between pairs of layers. In this way, normal brains require fewer synaptic connections, but longer axonal pathways (i.e. a given signal takes longer to be processed, but may travel through internal layers which modify and abstract features from outer layers).

    This property is theorized to give rise, in some autistics, to "idiot savant" abilities; such individuals often excel at a particular skill or set of skills (such as multiplying large numbers together very quickly). For example, one might be able to multiply 5 digit numbers together in a couple of seconds. However, because of the lack of inter-layers which allow for abstractions (and possibly understanding/comprehension of the processed information), the same person may have no concious concept of the numerical value of real world things.

    --
    (( (CRAYON) )) >
    1. Re:layer of abstraction by TheMohel · · Score: 3, Informative
      I've read that in some parts of the autistic brain, "layers" of neurons are connected directly to each other, such that every neuron in a particular layer is connected to every other neuron in the next layer. However, in normal brains, a third layer exists between pairs of layers.
      Link? It's been a few years since I took clinical neuroanatomy, but I don't recall running across this, and it seems quite unlikely. The formation of the neural layers is critical to the basic function of the brain (I mean any normal function) and disruption of this formation is likely to be catastrophic. Lissencephaly, a condition where the cortex forms abnormally (and fails to form normal gross features), is an example of such a condition, and one where the developmental outcome is uniformly horrible.
    2. Re:layer of abstraction by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK, you can get away with making up just about anything on slashdot, so long as you precede it with IIRC or AFAIK.

    3. Re:layer of abstraction by brother+bloat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Possibly true. However, in this case, I base my comment on ideas from Spitzer's The Mind Within The Net. You can read more about this here (it's a pdf): http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/ps/farivar.pdf/

      --
      (( (CRAYON) )) >
    4. Re:layer of abstraction by sparkes · · Score: 1

      IMHO the parent deserves a 1+ because AFAIK this is the truth

    5. Re:layer of abstraction by TheMohel · · Score: 1
      Possibly true. However, in this case, I base my comment on ideas from Spitzer's The Mind Within The Net. You can read more about this here (it's a pdf): http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/ps/farivar.pdf/

      Interesting. The PDF, of course, is a review of the work and not the work itself. More suspicious (to me) is that since this is a published book (and a book that is a general work, as opposed to one focused on autism), the age of Spitzer's references is likely to be more than a few years old. This is almost always a problem in the study of autism, because much of the work done prior to the past ten years is heavily confounded.

      Autism (and Asperger's for that matter) is a syndrome diagnosis. We don't have an underlying pathology that we can point to, and there are no imaging, genetic, or testing studies that are pathognomonic (that make the diagnosis in and of themselves). We basically say that if you have enough of the behavioral criteria and if there isn't any underlying etiology that better accounts for your symptoms, then you have autism. And with the symptoms not all that specific (as another poster noted, half of Slashdot's regular readers have some of them), it's an easy diagnosis to apply to a child with an unexplained developmental problem.

      Prior to the genetic studies for Fragile X, and prior to finding the marker for Rett's syndrome, and prior to the FISH for Prader-Willi, a lot of kids with those diagnoses (in aggregate, more common than severe autism itself) wound up with diagnoses of autism. Biologic research on their brains poisoned much of the research into what we call "autism", because in fact they weren't really autistic and the now-recognized characteristic changes in their biology got mixed in and called part of the findings of autism.

      I appreciate the reference, though, and I'll go check it out further. Spitzer might indeed be one of those myriad neuropsychoanatomy books that are more speculative than definitive, but I'm not so arrogant as to dismiss out of hand a book I haven't even skimmed.

  4. Cause or symptom? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This provides the first solid physical evidence to back up the theory that autism's root cause is a profound lack of empathy.

    Wouldn't lack of empathy be a symptom of autism rather than a cause? Or that since the lack of mirror neurons is the cause, it gets expressed as a lack of empathy?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Cause or symptom? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good catch. I missed that in my initial response in this thread. Lack of empathy, inability to process non-verbal communication (particularly the non-verbal sort associated with inter-gender relations) in the same innate manner as the average person, are the symptoms of my own Asperger's that have impacted me the most.

      THing is though, older aspies eventually work it out (the non-verbal communication/flirting/pass), just too late. It's almost as if the part of the brain that most people use for that sort of communication is wired into other reasoning processes in Aspergers and Autism subjects.

      My great fear has always been that that part of my brain was (theoretically) repurposed to the skills that currently allow me to make a living, and that any cure might render me able to understand non-verbal subtext, but doom me to a life as a McDonald's manager.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Cause or symptom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I didn't realize you were a Libertarian!

    3. Re:Cause or symptom? by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't lack of empathy be a symptom of autism rather than a cause?

      If I recall correctly, part of the problem is that it's both. The lack of empathy causes a lack of social interaction, and the absence of social interaction means that empathic skills don't get developed. This results in a rather nasty feedback loop.

    4. Re:Cause or symptom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My great fear has always been that that part of my brain was (theoretically) repurposed to the skills that currently allow me to make a living, and that any cure might render me able to understand non-verbal subtext, but doom me to a life as a McDonald's manager.

      I think such a fear is a the very least over stated, if only because there are numerous examples of people who are both successful professionally and interpersonally. For most people, it is not necessarily a choice of one or the other.

      Having said that, I don't know if we ever will have a true "cure" for this condition, or even if a real cure is needed. If all that ever happens is that people are capable, with self-knowledge and coping skills, live productive and content lives; what is the need to be "normal"? Obviously some people with Asperger's aren't even to this point, but I've always valued quality of an individual's life regardless of if they fit arbitrary behavorial norms.

    5. Re:Cause or symptom? by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      I don't know about dooming me to working as a McDonald's manager, but I wouldn't want to take the risk. I'm quite happy with my life as a HFA and wouldn't trade it for the world.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  5. mirror and backup by smartdreamer · · Score: 1

    This should serve has a reminder make backup; mirror data!

  6. What are you talking about? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Why would finding a cause for autism automatically debunk Aspergers?

    If autism can be measured across a spectrum, why wouldn't Aspergers just lie on the 'high' end?

    Then people with so called Aspergers would show the lightest biological symptom.

  7. I'm autistic by zappepcs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:I'm autistic by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1, Troll

      I think the point of the article (autism being a lack of empathy brain cells) means that it is you who is the insensitive clod.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:I'm autistic by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      Considering that part of the definition of autism includes highly stereotyped and repetitive use of language, you may have a point there :).

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
  8. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares about losers with assburgers?

  9. Three related articles by jd · · Score: 3, Informative
    A study in Australia using fMRI showing why certain forms of autism adversely affect problem-solving abilities.


    A Neurology journal article on the anatomy of Asperger's, as seen from fMRI scans


    Another neurology article, on the anatomy of Autism, as seen from fMRI scans


    The research at the Institute of Psychiatry, by Professor Declan Murphy is beginning to indicate that autism affects the frontal and mid-sections of the brain, whereas Aspergers appears to affect the frontal sections only. Nonetheless, other studies (not linked to here) have shown that those with asperger's have an elevated probability of having autistic children. In other words, there's good evidence they share mechanisms BUT there is also good evidence that autism outside of Asperger's involves additional mechanisms that are NOT present in Asperger's.


    I asked the IoP about research on Asperger's and autism a while back, and they pointed me to the following lecture (which does not appear to be on the web anywhere):


    Frith U. (2004) Emanuel Miller lecture: confusions and controversies about Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines. 45(4):672-86, 2004 May


    I hope this information is useful, trivially interesting or even interestingly trivial, depending on perspective.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  10. Oh, and better add the Autism Research Centre by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's at Cambridge University, so they have plenty of Austistic Spectrum test subjects (most of the students and staff, for example).

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. Diagnostic test? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    I honestly don't know if there are clear diagnostic tests for autism or Asperger's, or even if such tests are necessary, but could this methodology be extended to allow for conclusive medical diagnosis of autism? As I understand, it's a disorder that's characterized like other mental disorders by looking at symptoms--display enough of these signs, and you can be said to be autistic.

    Does this method allow for any child to be scanned with a medical imaging device and a conclusive diagnosis of autism given? Is this even necessary, or are neurologists/psychologists accurate enough and the symptoms clear enough not to need a diagnostic test? How many people are estimated to be autistic or to display Asperger's syndrome without knowing fairly early on about the disorder? (I know you can't count how many people aren't diagnosed, but if many cases of the disorder which I assume develops as a child are diagnosed for the first time in adults, then I think it's reasonable to say that most patients go for a long while without diagnosis.)

  12. Religion by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    This so called lack of empathy seems really scary to me. I always thought that religion could be avoided because we all have the ability act moral without the threat of eternal damnation.
    Maybe I was wrong?
    I hope not.

    1. Re:Religion by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

      Thinking that most religion is based on the threat of eternal damnation is pathetically ignorant, not to mention utterly unrelated to the ability to empathize and its loose connection to morality.

    2. Re:Religion by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Empathy is not required to develop morals. It's easy to figure out that it is wrong to lie. The hard part, which requires empathy, is knowing when you *should* lie.

    3. Re:Religion by sparkes · · Score: 1

      Spot on, as an aspie I can't lie to save my life, believe me I put this to the test as a youngster and got a few beatings ;-)

      example of how it effects my day to day life.

      SWMBO
      "does this make my arse look big"
      ME
      "No, your arse is big, I like big arses"

      Honest but probably not the best choice at this point.

    4. Re:Religion by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      You must be new around here.

      I'm sorry to say that most discussions of religion on /. have a high proportion of pathetically ignorant (or pathetically bigoted) comments.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I might be wrong here, but I seem to have heard of various autistic people most of them seem to have less violent or sadistic tendencies.

  13. Re: 1: Redundant... heh heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the topic, 1 Redundant = 5 Funny!

  14. Re: 1: Redundant... heh heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the topic, 1 Redundant = 5 Funny!

    Ya ya... definately +5 ya definately funny.

  15. The Brain is simply a cooling device by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

    Four billion years of evolution .The world is more competitive than you think.What is the advantage of being normal on this planet.The planet is full of people mimicing others.The planet is full of people trying to ignore reality.And life amaxingly still exists.Some people are designed to understand life, others mearly live life,Perfection canot be achived, you cant have both.People are different for many reasons.

    1. Re: The Brain is simply a cooling device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on that?

  16. Cognitive Specialisation by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Then is isn't Asperger's that you wish to debunk, but "geek syndrome".

    Asperger's exists, but your sig is fine: it helps clarify that AS is not just geekiness.

    I have a diagnosis for Aspergers which I got in the middle of a breakdown, and has been very useful in helping me to get the resources that I needed to get well. I am still prone to staying in the house for days on end, whereupon I get cabin fevour, although I can lie, and tell truth from fiction. My breakdown occurred because a therapist undermined me over a period of several years: over that time, I corrected what he was telling me, without realising the conclusions that he was drawing. I look at it now, and I am amazed: my therapist thought that I was a psycho because I told him that the golden rule doesn't work "because different people want different things", and because I valued freedom "but I'm not so much into equality"... My love of the subtle and the self-organising was taken for cunning and not caring...

    Maybe Leo Strauss had a point with his concept of the Straussian text, which has an exoteric ("outward") meaning that wasn't necessarily the same as the meaning drawn by the careful thinker. I ignored the exoteric, and, like Nietzsche, enjoyed using terms against their usual emphasis. In Straussian terms, I was being irresponsible, and I paid for it with a major mental collapse.

    Do I have Aspergers? Nowadays, having mostly pulled out of my breakdown, I barely suffer any social symptoms that I had. Certainly, there's still a trace, but prolongued analysis of many miscommunications, and the sequence of events that led to my breakdown have by and large prevented me from further major miscommunication as far as I can tell, and indeed it is common for Aspergans to aquire social skills (albiet late). I still have major problems with timeliness, and my ex- comes around once a week to help me to tidy my house, or else I wouldn't do it. It's not that I don't care: I love a tidy house; it's that I get trapped in routine and other activities...

    I am nowhere near as incapable as the character described in the Grandparent post, but I definately have difficulties. I also have advantages: I studied maths at Cambridge, and although I failed through depression, I was seen as being very capable by my supervisor. So, corny and PC though it sounds, I do not consider AS to be a disease, but rather a case of cognitive specialisation.

    1. Re:Cognitive Specialisation by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      because a therapist undermined me over a period of several years

      Which highlights a theory of my own: most therapists are psychos.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  17. Consistent by petrus4 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    (Note to mods whose first impulse might be to mod this Offtopic...it is relevant, but you'll need to read down a bit perhaps to find out why.)

    "Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication, a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound detachment to the rest of your species, facilitating the function of the One."
    -- The Architect talking to Neo, The Matrix: Reloaded. (Emphasis mine)

    Most people assume that the largely detached attitude of Neo is due purely to the inability of Reeves as an actor to emote. What they don't realise however, is that said lack of emoting for the most part is an integral part of the character.

    What the Architect describes above is basically the astrological sign of Aquarius, which science has labelled autism and assumed to be something neurologically anomalous...whereas the astrological perspective of course is that it is something which fits entirely into the natural order. For those bright sparks in the audience who will rush to remind me that there are autistics who aren't always solar Aquarians, that's true...but I would remind you that contrary to what Cosmopolitan might try and tell you, astrology isn't purely about sun signs...in fact that barely even scratches the surface. Show me any autistic individual with a non-Aquarian sun, and I'll show you a natal chart for the same individual with either several other planets in Aquarius, or a strongly aspected Uranus. (the planet associated with Aquarius)

    My point here is that autism isn't a fluke, or something that's "wrong" with people. When the people who wrote that stupid play Hair and the song, "the age of Aquarius," they were wrong about *how* the new period would change people.

    Call me a schizophrenic nut case if you like...but us going into the Aquarian period on the one hand, and autism diagnosis going through the roof on the other, is not merely some blind coincidence. It's a case of people adapting to an emerging society whose priorities, conventions, and entire way of life is going to be profoundly different to the one that is currently ending.

    1. Re:Consistent by BurntNickel · · Score: 1

      "Most people assume that the largely detached attitude of Neo is due purely to the inability of Reeves as an actor to emote. What they don't realise however, is that said lack of emoting for the most part is an integral part of the character.

      Here I always thought that the inability of Reeves, as an actor, to emote was written into the character after the fact.

      --
      And the knowledge that they fear is a weapon to be used against them...
    2. Re:Consistent by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Either this is a really good troll or...


      That line is "a profound attachment to the rest of your species"

      Otherwise the next line makes no sense at all:
      "While the others experienced this in a very general way, your experience is far more specific--vis a vis..love."

    3. Re:Consistent by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1
      "Show me any autistic individual with a non-Aquarian sun, and I'll show you a natal chart for the same individual with either several other planets in Aquarius, or a strongly aspected Uranus. (the planet associated with Aquarius)"

      You could probably do the same for a sizable fraction of the population, too. I'm sorry, but that assertion has about the same value as (and in fact is very similar to) the Discordian Law of Fives.

      Want to prove me wrong? First, define "several" and then determine what percentage of the year fits your definition above. If it's > 40%, I'd say the predictive power is minimal. Second, collect a couple hundred birthdates of autistic people and see where they fall in the year. If the results are statistically significant, then you've got something.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    4. Re:Consistent by Mentorix · · Score: 1

      Wait wait, are you saying you think astrology has any kind of predictive power?

  18. To an extent by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    From my own limited experience the lack of empathy can lead to causing harm to others BUT not in an intentional way. Even if they may not understand that other people can feel pain they do not go out of their way to cause pain either. An autist is not "evil" and can almost by definition never be a sadist.

    A sadist perhaps is a person who has reversed empathy, he/she gets off on the pain of others. An autist doesn't "get" that others can feel pain so would have no motivation to cause harm.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:To an extent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my own limited experience the lack of empathy can lead to causing harm to others BUT not in an intentional way. Even if they may not understand that other people can feel pain they do not go out of their way to cause pain either. An autist is not "evil" and can almost by definition never be a sadist.

      True enough, however there do exist a class of people apparently lacking the capability to empathize (in both the common and psycological senses) with others. They are called sociopaths. Obviously though there has to be something else wrong with sociopaths, probably a lack of empath coupled with extreme self-intrest.

  19. Subclinical == NULL by redelm · · Score: 1
    Number and severity of symptomes is the absolute key to diagnosis under the DSM. It _has_ to be debilitating. Otherwise, there's nothing in there that isn't desireable in moderation.

    1. Re:Subclinical == NULL by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Yes- but whose lifestyle isn't debilitating to some extent? I think what the original complaint was that this is being used to label people- and once labeled, one might find it a bit hard to get insured for health care at all, or get that promotion into management, or be able to go to school without having the brain put in slow gear by drugs. This is far more about misdiagnoses and wrongful treatment than it is a critique against the DSM.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Subclinical == NULL by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I think the whole point is that it's not part of a "lifestyle." It hinders the persons desired lifestyle. I think you're right about the whole labeling thing.

    3. Re:Subclinical == NULL by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if anything, Asperger's and Geek lifestyle go so well together that the behaviors that are considered excessive by the DSM are positives for any geek. Sure, it's dibilitating to a *normal* lifestyle- but to a geek lifestyle it just fits. That's why some autistics have formed the theory that they are the next stage of human evolution- Homo Sapiens Informous- The Information Age Man.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  20. And any slashdot poster... by aminorex · · Score: 1

    And any slashdot poster can be expected to be intimately familiar with the pathological deficit of empathy ic understanding found in the readership.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  21. Profound Lack of Empathy. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess Dubya and the right-wing Repuglicans gots some missing mirror-neurons!

  22. What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the two areas of the brain affected determined Asperger's, Autism or Schizophrenia. Let's say affection of just region A is Asperger's, just area B is Shizophrenia and A and B is autism.

    Wouldn't that be interesting.

  23. Jeez by ag-gvts-inc · · Score: 1

    Hey everybody, guess what? Most of you are just fine. You're probably either teenagers (it's normal to feel not normal as a teen), or you're under-socialized--that is, you're slightly geeky, you're inclined to overanalyze things and you don't know enough different kinds of people to be able to compare yourself accurately. Once you've gotten to know different types of people, you'll find out you're quite normal.

    I just don't think everyone's some misunderstood, tragic genius. I know I'm not anyways.