Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own MMOG

yebb writes "CNet reports about a company called Multiverse that has just begun beta testing of its platform for creating and integrating online virtual worlds. They are allowing developers and companies to use their online framework to expedite development of online games. Their network is free to use as long as you don't make any money from it's usage, but they also provide open source client applications to use or modify as you see fit." From the article: "'The business model is long-term,' said Richard Bartle, one of the pioneers of online games and an editor of Terra Nova, a leading Web site about virtual worlds. 'Although Multiverse's software will help speed up the to-market time for companies, it's still going to take developers ages to create content.' While Bartle is cautious about Multiverse's business model, he's fascinated by its potential."

11 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Distributed MMORPGs by VGPowerlord · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wonder if anyone will ever get around to making a distributed MMORPG. Something where different parts of the game world would be hosted by different operators.

    I suppose that would open a whole new slew of issues, though.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  2. Umm... by ndansmith · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I guess by Massively Multiplayer they mean "like 5 or 6 of your buddies."

    I just cannot see anyone getting a large community of players together without a large development and advertising budget. Large development budgets also lead to independent, customized systems with total control, which is the opposite of the Multiverse concept.

    1. Re:Umm... by swilde23 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I just cannot see anyone getting a large community of players together without a large development and advertising budget. Large development budgets also lead to independent, customized systems with total control, which is the opposite of the Multiverse concept.

      Didn't people say the same thing about Linux (and its variations)? Look at all the different flavors, and then consider the select few that have a reasonable following. I imagine that's what will happen here, assuming the base code is worthwhile. We'll see a handful of good games emerge from a cool idea, but we'll also see several thousand others that die.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    2. Re:Umm... by podperson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plenty of NeverWinter Nights servers attract larger consistent followings with no advertising.

  3. Oh great by jackcarter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just what I need: joining some guy's MMOG and start standing inside the goatse guy's ass.

  4. Let Users create content by glengineer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about an MMORPG wherein the users can create content? So, after I play a while and become famous, rich whatever, I can build my own dungeon, castle, create my own army, my own artifact, create my own quests that other players undertake... There are a LOT of users out there with good content ideas who cannot get past the large undertaking to create their own game system, but who would love to create their own content in an existing one.

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
    1. Re:Let Users create content by John+Hurliman · · Score: 4, Informative
  5. Acronym translation by Otto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sadly, I understood that and I've never played that game.

    SWG = Star Wars Galaxies
    CU = Combat Upgrade, which changed SWG in large ways, making it incompatible with previous versions. This led to pre-CU servers being made for people who preferred the old way
    NGE = New Game Enchancements, which did much the same thing in terms of splitting the userbase.

    I read too damn much gaming news.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  6. TomeNet engine is open by Lord+Satri · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you take a look a TomeNet, you get a MMORPG open engine. The sad thing is, you must go to the forums to learn anything about it because the website isn't updated often.

    TomeNet is a roguelike multiplayer online rolepaying game based on Tolkien's work. The single player game is also getting closer to version 3.0, with a revamped game engine (open, with source code available). Great game and great community.

  7. Hasn't this been done? by gtshafted · · Score: 4, Informative

    I could be wrong, but doesn't Neverwinter Nights and Second Life already let you do this?

  8. NeverWinter Nights? by podperson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only real difference between this idea and NeverWinter Nights is that:

    This product supports ANY setting (although it probably requires a ton of work to make it support anything other than the vanilla fantasy setting they first thought of)

    This product supports ANY ruleset (although it probably requires a ton of work to make it not support something other than the default fantasy ruleset)

    This product is MASSIVE whereas NWN isn't. Although NWN or a descendant probably will be before they ship anything.

    This product provides developers with an SDK. NWN provides developers with a fully functional IDE allowing a person only one skill (e.g. writing / programming / art) to contribute to or create a world.

    This product provides a revenue model for content developers. NWN kind of does (they can commercialise a module you develop) but so far this hasn't worked out well for anyone except the developers of NWN.

    This product doesn't exist. NWN does.