Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Invest $1.7 billion in India

piyushranjan writes "Bill Gates has announced that Microsoft will invest $1.7 billion in India over the next four years to expand its operations. The fund would also be spent in making India a major hub of Microsoft's research, product and application development, services and technical support for both global and domestic companies. Microsoft plans to create 3000 more jobs at India, taking it's headcount at India to 7000."

16 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. microsoft announces... by know1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that they are crapping their pants at the state of linux acceptance in india, and the widespread use of the operating system independant programming language java.

  2. Heck... by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny


    Why worry about H1B Visas when you can just buy India.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Heck... by pubjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know you're only joking, but the annual GDP of India (according to the CIA world factbook) is $ 3,319,000,000,000, so it's worth considerably more than Microsoft...

  3. Watch my left hand... by pieterh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...as my right hand takes your wallet.

    Cue the debate about US job losses and globalisation. The real issue IMO is the Microsoft tactics of using trade pressure to lobby for anti-competition legislation. "Yes, I'll invest 1.8bn, but only if you ban free software and enable software patents".

    The truth is that India is capable of doing a lot better without this kind of "help". I encourage Indian politicians to reject any such pressure. Indian IT can compete securely on the open market, without favours or protectionism. Software patents, and other anti-competitive laws will only hurt India in the medium and long term.

    1. Re:Watch my left hand... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The real issue IMO is the Microsoft tactics of using trade pressure to lobby for anti-competition legislation.

      While I certainly hate to see lobbying efforts effect government laws directly, this is one of those "open, free market" kinda issues. I don't really want to see legislation in India influenced by Microsoft, but if MS wants to do business in India, set up shop, create jobs, increase GDP, etc. - well, is that definately a "bad thing?"

      I know the general karma is MS is bad, but if you believe in capitalism as a fundamental driver of freedom, then markets must be opened, and MS should be allowed to set up shop and do business where they please (within applicable laws.) This can only be good for the Indian economy and job situation (as much as I hate my support calls routing to "Cathy" in India.)

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
  4. Defensive move by pubjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I expect Microsoft will be making similar investments in China too.

    I see this as partly a defensive move - they know India and China are potentially two big markets for the future, and they don't want them considering OSS alternatives. They will use these investments to twist the governments arms. Although I don't think it will work with the Chinese, it might work in India.

  5. I wonder if . . . by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Demand will begin to outpace supply in India's IT sector causeing the price of IT skilled labor to increase. If so it will reduce India's competitive advantage and less Indians will see any advantage to coming to the USA.

  6. Welcome to economy 101 by PromptZero · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The expanding into Asia and Europe is hardly synonymous with outsourcing. It's more like being realistic about where the growth is in IT. I'm suprised they aren't also setting up in Brazil.

    The key markets for information technology in the next few decades are not the US, Western Europe or Japan. The key markets key, as in where the majority of goods will be purchsed and consumed-- are Mainlaind China, India, Eastern Europe and South America.

    Where do I get that idea? Easy, hardware manufacturers. People in the wealthy nations often have a hard time imagining how hardware can get any cheaper and still remain profitable and yet it does relentlessly continue to decline in price. The answer to how it remains profitable is simple, volume. And that volume cannot and will not exist in the highly profitable and yet relatively sparsely populated wealthy countries. There simply are not enough consumers.

    So, as a manufacturer, you simply enter new markets by lowering your costs until the real masses, the billions, can afford your products. And you can bet that WiMax is going to be one of the enabling technolgies that is going to make this push into the "third world" happen all that much faster.

    Which means it makes perfect sense for Microsoft to have a real presence in these markets. In fact, you could argue they're moving too slowly.

    But none of that has the slightest thing to do with "outsourcing". It's just the reality of where IT is going.

  7. Funny ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And Microsoft wonders why there are less and less people going into Computer Science and other Computer programs here in the States?

  8. It's only about $$$ by gasmonso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having worked with a software development group in India for 3 years now, I can honestly say I am not impressed. Many of the engineers there are well educated on paper, but in reality lacked creativity and the ability to work independently. They were definitely cheaper, but the price we paid for that was a huge cut in productivity. We needed 2-3x more of them to get the job of one engineer done here.

    On the flip side, I also work with many Indians here in the US on my team. The differences are startling compared to their counterparts in India. They are much stronger in all aspects of engineering, whether its creativity or pure coding knowledge. It appears that the issues are somewhat cultural and will improve with time.

    Good luck to Microsoft and the others, but we are scaling back our staff in India. It's just not worth it yet.

    gasmonso http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:It's only about $$$ by yahyamf · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm from the middle east but I've studied both in India and the US. Here's my perspective:

      The Indians that come to the US are usually the brightest 2% or so from the top colleges in the country. Degrees from the average Indian colleges are usually not worth the paper they're printed on. The facilities available to students are negligible compared to the US. For example, in the city of Hyderabad with a population in the millions, there are maybe 2 public libraries.

      However, with home computers and broadband internet fast becoming commonplace, this is all set to change especially in engineering and computer science. Indian students are no longer isolated from the rest of the world, they now have access to the same software, books and culture as their Western counterparts. The latest textbooks were not affordable or even available and publishers would only sometimes bring out an 'eastern economy edition' or something. But now most technology related ebooks are available for free (due to piracy).

      I was a TA for undergrads in the US and I can tell you that Indian students are much more hard working than Americans, who seem pampered by comparison. My job was more baby-sitting than teaching. Also, for many Indians education is the only way out of their miserable economic conditions, whereas in the US someone can drop out of high school and get a job flipping burgers and maintain a standard of life that is luxurious compared to his Indian counterpart.

      You may be right that outsourcing is not worth it right now, but you'll be surprised how fast this is going to change. Moreover, due to the huge population, if only 10% of Indian students become skilled enough to be globally competitive they will be a force to be reckoned with.

      It's obvious Microsoft and the others know this already.

  9. Re:MA and OpenDoc by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft I can see...Not like they're error free to begin with.

    But Intel? Didn't they learn anything?

    Time to buy some more AMD stock.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  10. Investing in India by RelliK · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Gates was emphatically impressed with India's human resource saying, "India has a fantastic pool of software professionals. The world needs to benefit from this. I never thought with so little product companies software services sector will grow so strong as it has grown here."

    Yeah, I'm sure this has nothing to do with India's move to open source software. And I'm sure Microsoft's investment will in no way affect the government's decision. No sir.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  11. Re:I'd be curious to know... by nihaopaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it is a smart move for microsoft, look at their neibour, china.

    With the skilled workforce of india and low cost and then less restrictive laws as such countries as china it would make perfect sense to be based in india for the middleeast and asia market.

    my 2jiao

  12. Re:Are you sure that the GDP by pubjames · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, the CIA says so:

    http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/ranko rder/2001rank.html

    It doesn't surprise me, but I think that table may shock the many Americans who have a very distorted view of the world!

  13. Re:Mod parent up by Directrix1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No the story should read: "Microsoft outsources to India: Press Paid-off to show in Positive Light".

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF