Slashdot Mirror


User: SatanicPuppy

SatanicPuppy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,385
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,385

  1. Re:Interesting... on HP Spent Over $80M To Get Rid of Its CEOs · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever deal with SAP? That anyone would hire their former CEO to do anything but wash windows is astonishing to me. Apotheker performed exactly as I would have expected him to.

  2. Re:Heh. on GPGPU Bitcoin Mining Trojan · · Score: 1

    Because they're increasing the money supply, and that is a primary driver of inflation?

  3. Heh. on GPGPU Bitcoin Mining Trojan · · Score: 0

    Wasn't one of the big "selling points" of bitcoins that they weren't inflationary?

    Ooops.

  4. Re:What countries? on Why Some People Don't Have Fingerprints · · Score: 1

    Undoing mod down. =P

  5. Re:All too many times... on How To Ruin Your Game's PC Port · · Score: 3, Insightful

    FUCKING ASSASSINS CREED BLEEEEEAAAARG!

    Worst. Controls. Ever.

    That is all. Blah, blah, blah filter error. Looks like yelling? Well, duh, that was the fucking point.

  6. Re:The new truism on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    Actually, the drug argument is the first thing that popped into my head. Can't beat supply and demand, so legalize and tax.

  7. Re:The new truism on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you're talking about. If I wanted to buy a +40 jillion sword of epic wanking for WoW, I could go to any number of sites, and pay cash for that. I could do it *right now*. I could buy Diablo 2 items *right now*.

    It is true Blizzard sells pets and crap like that for cash, but it is not true that they are selling anything different now. They're providing a cash auction house where PLAYERS can sell stuff to OTHER PLAYERS for money. In short, they're targeting the third party sites that sell items. That's it.

  8. Re:The new truism on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    If Blizzard *themselves* were selling weapons or armor or something that they created, then yes, I would agree. This is just bringing the player-to-player exchanges that have been around since forever in-house.

  9. Re:The new truism on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    Eh. If I was going to have to deal with a bunch of cash, I'd charge a fee too. It's a huge pain in the ass. They'll need new staff, and they'll have to pay fees, etc, etc.

  10. Re:The new truism on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    All they're doing is hosting a player auction house, where items can be bought from players by players for cash. They're not selling items themselves.

  11. Re:Pay To Work!! on Blizzard Reveals Diablo 3 (Real Money) Auction House · · Score: 1

    Your point would be more valid if there weren't dozens of services that do the exact same thing already. I see this as Blizzard making a virtue of necessity: if people are going to sell their rare items, then why not facilitate that?

    Nobody is making you play.

  12. Re:Question: on NASA's Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto · · Score: 1

    Zero?

  13. Invite? on Google+ Already At 10 Million Users · · Score: 1

    Emails in the comment header.

  14. Re:How... Ironic. on US Supreme Court: Video Games Qualify For First Amendment · · Score: 1

    People still buy porn?

    Weird.

  15. Re:I tell you what on Wikipedia Adds "WikiLove" For Newbie Editors · · Score: 1, Funny

    My kingdom for mod points.

  16. Re:Structured data makes this easier on Federally-Mandated Medical Coding Gums Up IT Ops · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. It would only be a burden if you had to update the old records.

    That being said, however, I'm sure that shit is hardcoded all over the damn place.

  17. This is a common tactic to use against news organizations. Chances are, they're going to have to pay copy costs for each page as well...I think federal law caps the cost at $.25 per page. Joy.

  18. Re:how they know on Palin Fans Deface Paul Revere Wikipedia Page · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm guessing you're a fan...In fact, you may actually be her, judging by your meticulous grammar and extraordinary vocabulary.

  19. Re:Link to Wikipedia on Palin Fans Deface Paul Revere Wikipedia Page · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why don't you check the revision history? Find on page? Really?

  20. Re:The problem with USPS is ... on Tech Experts Look To Help Save the Postal Service · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No. Look, there are a lot of annoying things about the USPS, but it has only one real problem: it has to deliver to EVERY PLACE IN THE US. When you compare to FedEx or UPS, you miss the point. They go hub to hub, and they don't deliver to low population areas, more less support offices there.

    If they cut back to more profitable services, they'd be well in the black, but their "mission" (which is dictated by the govt) precludes this, so there are problems.

  21. Re:Truecrypt on 'Motherlode' of Data Seized At Bin Laden Compound · · Score: 1

    Eh. Encryption is hard. Doing it right takes a decent amount of work, and a ton of discipline. There will be more mistakes.

  22. Re:home routers on IPv6 Traffic Remains Minuscule · · Score: 1

    This is based on the idea that everyone wants to run services from home, and that's just not the case for the world outside Slashdot. The vast majority of people would have zero use for that functionality.

    The reason people haven't leapt on IPv6 is because it's a pain in the ass. Organizationally, it's probably the worst transition you can imagine. We did a IPv4->IPv4 (public range to private range) transition company wide a few years back, and it was godawful, and that's just for a piddly ass /16 block that already *had* some LANs in the private range, where all sites were WAN'd with high-end routers that were all interconnected in tight BGP circuits that *theoretically* should have just picked up the routing changes.

    And it went well. Reasonably. No catastrophic failures. Manageable scheduled downtime. But shifting 10,000+ plus unique addresses is a nightmare, and every time a site moved, we had to spend hours checking servers, and babying the goddamn DCs. I can't think anyone would want to do it if they didn't absolutely have to.

  23. Re:Above All Else on Requiring Algebra II In High School Gains Momentum · · Score: 1

    Suck. My. Cock.

    Pretentious fucking math weenies OOOooo look, nothing we do has a practical application, look how fucking special we are! NEWSFLASH ASSHOLE, NOBODY GIVES A SHIT. 99% of the world *doesn't* learn that way, and forcing the whole education system to fit that crappy mold is why no one can fucking do math. They don't know what it's FOR.

    But of *course* it's not because you're fuckups who can't come up with a decent curriculum. It's because everyone else is stupid. Way to solve the goddamn problem. Oh wait, it's a *practical* problem. Are there any physicists in the house? Chemists? Anyone who uses math for something besides masturbation?

  24. Re:Above All Else on Requiring Algebra II In High School Gains Momentum · · Score: 2

    Math education was terrible when I was in school. I am a practical person: without real world problems, I can't get a real handle on anything. When I took Calculus I hated derivatives...It was never explained what they were *for*...It just seemed like masturbation. The next semester I took physics and the prof made some offhanded remark about the equations of motion, and the whole thing became perfectly fucking clear! I had goddamn twitching foaming epiphany right in the middle of fucking class! I wanted to take my heavy ass book and beat the shit out of my calc prof!

    The whole idea that math should be taught as if it is completely divorced from the physical world is why everyone hates math.

  25. Re:Blah blah. on Piracy Is a Market Failure — Not a Legal One · · Score: 1

    True. But in this case, it's quite easy to get them unofficially, so the price burden needs to be pretty low.