Pocket Linux Server Showdown
phaedo00 writes "Ars Technica has put together a review of two pocket Linux servers (the Gumstix Connex 200 and the Waysmall 200BT). The review covers all aspects, including programming for the devices and their respective communities: "As with any OSS-based project, the community is what makes the Waysmall powerful. It's the community that comes up with novel applications, and develops new uses for the existing hardware. The Waysmall community is coming together as evidenced by several very involved projects and a healthy online presence in the wiki and mailing lists. Additionally, the Gumstix developers seem to be taking active roles in the community, folding community recommendations into their products as well as offering leadership and advice. Somewhat more organized and comprehensive documentation would be welcome, but not if it comes at the expense of accuracy, which the current documentation seems to have in hand.""
Stay tuned for the Pocket Linux Server Meltdown! Coming up next.
hopefully TFA isn't hosted on one.
The review is actually of the Gumstix Waysmall 200BT and the BlackDog Pocket Linux Server. The Gumstix Connex 200 is similar to the Waysmall, but only mentioned as related, not reviewed.
Downloading the Internets ( In page 2 of TFA )
I thought the internet that I downloaded last week was the only one, looks like I'll have to find the other ones too
Can someone tell my why a web server of this size and capability is useful?
"Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
While the Gumstix offering could be useful for a number of applications, although I would be more inclined to buy the "bits" I needed for a specfic project, the Blackdog looks totally useless.
From the article it seems that it basically piggybacks onto a desktop computer, and them allows you to connect to it (in the articles case via X11) and run some applications... Given that it needs a much more powerful computer to control it what is the difference between it and a USB memory stick with applications that can run on the host os... The programs may be running on the blackdog instead of the host, but so what.
Gumstix on the otherhand looks like a nice solution for a robotics project I have starting in January...
What I really want to see is a driver for DVI or VGA. And maybe some more RAM. But moore's law means in a few years that extra memory is practically a given. Maybe I should just buy a mac mini instead =/
I Browse at +4 Flamebait
Open Source Sysadmin
Why not have a usb powered disk with virtual pc and the vmc & vhds you want on it. The laptop drive enclosures are pretty small and you can get all your favourite software in the images and even a number of different builds. There is also a mac version but I am not sure if they can use the same images.
I've been looking for small cheap headless computers for a long time, but they are hard to search. Want to use them as servers. Found Soekris, which does the job, but took a while to set up. Had to figure out how to net boot, cross compile, and work around various limitations. Meanwhile, the distro I used (uwoody from ucLibc) has vanished, so if I want to update, I'll have to start from scratch. Would prefer something easier to set up, and these don't sound like they are any easier. Still, glad to know about Waysmall and BlackDog. Anyone know of others?
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
I have to admit that, although I have no use for the Connex right now, the ultra geeky coolness of them makes my mouth water.
The only thing that came to mind about these was what a great distributed cracking tool they would be. I can't recall the first place that I read about the idea (2600? phrack?) of putting a small wall-mount box in a telco closet leaching off the nearest T1. It would be soooo easy. Although I've never done it, I've often planned it out in my head. I worked for a couple companies that had branch offices scattered around the US with no local IT presence. They only site visits were to upgrade servers, switches, or routers. It was pretty rare that anyone would touch anything unless they were expressly told to do so. A box on the wall would go completely unnoticed. During a site visit, we once found a BSD firewall attached to our network in a branch office that had been installed by a previous consulting company. We had not detected it in our remote scans because it was configured to be transparent.
Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
.. is is this one ...
; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
Micro "servers" (god how I hate how the word server is mis-used) seems to be a concept that most I show mine to, or talk to about them, don't understand. So lets get a few things straight.
.. and say for the sake of arugument I could fit 500 gumsticks in this box. I now can supply my users with their own idividual server, choice of OS, Choice of XXXXX as they desired for what 90% of all Net systems are, low volume. The guy who gets 100 unique visits an hour doesn't need even a pIV to do what she's doing. The cost savings for the ISP in electricity (Cooling and server) are huge, those get passed on to the user in many ways, (lower colo costs, lowered pollution etc).
..... Someday even the RIAA and SBC/ATT will figure this out.
1. You aren't going to be able in the immediate future to compress a 8-way opeteron Raid 5 terabyte server into a pocket device.
2. That 500 dollar video card you just bought won't help you read e-mail faster. (gameing may rock, video editing may be helped but e-mail just won't care)
3. More Ram just like anything else has it's limits. If you exceed the amount the system can use efficiently you are wasting money and time (I had a customer with 3 1gb sticks in his mobo, each slot had a 512mb limit.... guess what! that's why he's a customer *grin*)
4. In the Windows world the concept is "Bring the mainframe to the desktop" In the *nix world the concept is "Many hands make light work" Neither concept is wrong per se. Unless applied at the wrong time, to the wrong place.
Given the above and especially #4 trying to turn the Gumstick or the BlackDog into a high end Opteron is a joke. BUT, what if I took a 1U connected to a Storage server and filled it with gumsticks. Each one is in it's own right a computer, each computer is independent of the other
The days of acting like the Seagulls in "Finding Nemo" are over. Mine, Mine, Mine, is no longer a way to go, doing everything in one box is a waste
I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.
the following is a link to the BlackDog forum in which discussions are made about how many things the BlackDog is being used for after just a couple of months of being in existance. http://dogpound.projectblackdog.com/forum/forum.ph p?thread_id=14&forum_id=1
Seems to me that someone has BlackDog envy. Just buy one to upgrade that old Gumstix of yours to make feel the real capabilities instead of just being able to be used for robotics.
http://www.xyzcomputing.com/index.php?option=conte nt&task=view&id=486&Itemid=2