P2P Polluter Shuts Down
Dotnaught writes "Loudeye Corp. said today it is closing its anti-piracy unit, Overpeer, Inc., in an effort to cut costs. Overpeer is best known for polluting P2P networks with garbled digital files. For what it's worth, the Internet filter at CMP Media, where I work, blocks Overpeer's site as 'spyware.'"
I guess this is one big step closer to reversing global warming... oh wait...
For what it's worth, the Internet filter at CMP Media, where I work, blocks Overpeer's site as 'spyware.'"
For what it's worth, a friend that works at Honeywell says that Bug Me Not's site is blocked as "hacking and subversion tools".
Yeah, exactly, so what?
The application ... describes the methodology ...
3) Edit illegally produced digital music file (damage sound quality).
Thank god... if I get another 64 kbps Wang Chung song I'm gonna give up on this P2P crap and go back to using Hotline.
The IP blocks they use are widely known and have become ineffective against savvy filesharers. More likely, they're going to go under deeper cover, sourcing bandwidth from consumer sources like cable modem and DSL providers to spy on file sharers and pollute the networks. I'm surprised it's taken this long.
I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
Not really a huge victory, because the polluted files are still out there - you'd be surprised how many dumbasses don't delete fake files from their directories, and that means all their pollutants out there for the time they've been operating are still floating around, being downloaded and annoying more people - Kazaa and it's network are likely to remain entirely unusable for a long time thanks to this, and what better division to shut down than one that has done it's job, and creating an almost self-perpetuating state of pollution?
I guess the good thing is that now the jackasses that worked for these people are now unemployed - while I largely disagree with illegal P2P filesharing, I can see that it's a symptom of overpriced and 'evil' cartels and hate the fact that they employ shitheads like this, who's sole buisness is rooted firmly into the 'annoy as many people as we can for fun and profit' business model, rather than realising they'd get far more sales (and thus more profit) if they lowered their damn profit margin on every disc
(then again, they'd also save money if they signed good, existing, unsigned bands instead of manufacturing cookie-cutter Britney pop and having to pay songwriters, etc hundreds of thousands of dollars rather than getting the whole thing in one package by signing up real bands, but I can't see that happening any time soon...)
Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
Really? I'd like to know how they went around to build these relationships:
It is Christmas, that time of year when people are reminded to do special things for their fellow humans. God bless them, every one.
-/Fires up Shareaza in the spirit of Christmas...
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
It means either:
a) The record companies didn't find this type of disruption cost-effective
or
b) Somebody else can do it better/cheaper
You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
By the way, OverPeer is by no means the only polluter out there. There are spammers who serve the same iPod ad under every conceivable name. Credence marks those as crap and moves them to the bottom of the list, once someone else has voted on them.
Previous Slashdot discussion on Credence is here.
Polluting is a short term solution, on the lines of - if you can't stop them, annoy them.
.Polluters can keep the starting part of a file good while messing the rest of it, so preview statring from any random place in the file can be implemented.
It will only result in more sophisticated clients. Some features which may circumvent this method are -
-Rating : polluters can also artificially rate their files high, but assuming that pirates outnumber them by thousands, its highly useful.
-Hashing : polluters can easily create and hash their files, but this will stop them from polluting existing stuff.
-Preview : preview-before-download is most effective way of checking if a file is valid
-Blocking : autoblocking a user if he has a lot of wrong files.
-Chat : asking the user about the file's quality. You cant expect a polluter to sit 24x7 in front of his servers chatting with millions.
-Voice and music recognition : the s/w may evolve so much that it will recognize any speech and music information present in the file and will warn if not found. Same can be done with images.
-Encryption : a trusted network can start encrypting the files, if client provides such a feature.
-Redundancy : a p2p network can have dedicated servers to copy bits of files and place them on client machines. A million copies can beat a few polluted ones.
God created man in his own image, but somehow he evolved into a hairless monkey.