Slashdot Mirror


White Box, Or Big Names for Lower-End Servers?

LazloToth asks: "Those of us who manage small- to medium-size networks face the decision all the time: for the run-of-the-mill web, print, or storage server running on i386 architecture, should we buy HP or Dell, for example, or build it ourselves from commodity hardware and save some bucks up front? In my operation of fewer than 50 servers, one will see a mix of the two. For servers that take more abuse, I tend to buy the proprietary stuff. But not always. I wonder what experiences other admins and managers have had with do-it-yourself servers in a production environment, and whether they feel that white-box servers perform as well - - and last as long - - as anything else? What is the mix in your network of big-names to no-names?"

9 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Two sides by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there are two sides the issue here

    big name - warranty (saving your ass)

    white box - if you build it yourself you know what's in there. It's cheaper. But you don't have a warranty.

    1. Re:Two sides by madstork2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Only if it is an on-site warranty, and the turn around is guaranteed in a short period of time. I have used White boxes, because I can usuall afford to buy 3 lowend boxes for about the price of a single Dell.

      I run webserver and have about 25 boxes. I buy motherboards from only a couple of manufacturers that I trust. I run commodity Harddrives, and use rsync rather than fancy scsi. I look at the individual warranty on the parts.

      I generally save enough $$ that I can buy the server and a "hot-spare" for well less than the price of a name brand box. I have had relatively few hardware issues, and even the ones I did have could be fixed quickly and cheaply. It is nice when no single component costs more than about $150.

      I guess in essense I am warrantying it myself, warranties do no good if the server is going to be down for any length of time and you are dependent on a big companies whims.

      -MS2k

    2. Re:Two sides by toddbu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In addition to the money you save, you'll also save a lot of time. I've run both high-end Compaq machines and servers that I've build myself, and I've found the latter to be a lot easier to deal with. Here's why:

      • No special drivers to load - Compaq has their own configuration tools and just keeping track of the CDs with the software was a pain. If something goes wrong, is it the driver, your OS, or something else?
      • Inability to debug hardware - You can't drop a proprietary drive in another machine that you have in your office to see if it works. You have to have another proprietary machine to see where the problem is.
      • Touchy hardware - Some might disagree with me, but I found Compaq hardware to be really touchy. When you spend $10-20K on a single box, you expect it to always run. I've found as good or better reliability in machines that you build yourself.
      • Configured the way you want - It can be difficult to build out a proprietary machine just that way you want it. If the vendor is short on parts, you have to choose between getting it now in a different configuration or waiting until they have the part. When you build your own stuff, you buy what you want when you want it.

      Don't get me wrong - there are times when proprietary systems make sense. I don't think I'd ever build my own laptop. But servers are better when you build them yourself.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  2. Proprietary is usually better by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lights out management usually works better on IBM, HP or Dell systems. Also, building and fixing machines is a pain and gets time consuming & expensive, particularly if you get a bad batch of drives or motherboards that requires alot of fixing.

    If you are running < 10-15 machines, I can see cost savings in going whitebox. But if you are tight on staff and runnings lots of machines, buying name-brand kit is cheaper in the long run.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  3. White box all the way by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The contents of the box are pretty generic for most purposes. Motherboard from Asus/Intel/..., BIOS from Phoenix/Award/..., Processor from Intel/AMD/Motorola/...

    What really makes a difference is the vendor. I have a local guy who I can call and ask for recommendations and advice. If I tell him I want a Dual Opteron with 12 gig RAM, mirrored 74 GB hot-swap drives, dual hot-swap PS and a rack-mount case of my choosing he personally delivers it a couple days later.

    Drive in my raid-array dies? He brings by a replacement the following day.

    Oh, and the only number he gives me is his cell phone. And he answers it. Always.

    With the exception of some specialized telephony equipment (actually a different white-box vendor specializing in that market - Dell et. al. wouldn't have a clue about this stuff), he is always my first call.

    I've been using him for years. When the company he worked for ceased operations he started his own and service has remained outstanding.

    I guarantee that nobody who uses the "name brand" machines can come anywhere close to the responsiveness and support that I get from my local vendor.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
  4. Pick a major vendor by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We went the white-box route on our first compute cluster, which were then converted to desktops later. Decent machines, but the power-supplies weren't up to the 24x7 operation and tended to eventually have the fans sieze up, causing the ps to overheat. Eventually other components showed that they could have been better, and we cannibalized some machines to keep others running. They were replaced by HP and IBM boxes under 3-year, next-day, service contracts.

    The advantage of calling IBM, HP, or even Dell, is not simply the service contract (though your time is worth something), or the fact that their QC is superior to wherever you're getting your parts from, but that they have real engineers, who worry about such issues as optimizing air-flow, choosing proper fan-sizes, etc. Take apart an IBM xSeries 345 some time, then try to decide if you could actually buy parts to build a machine like that, for less than just calling IBM.

    White-box systems may have once made sense, ( I remember a 386/40 AMD-based system that I wrote my thesis on that was still running when I came to visit years later), but with modern components, heat-loads, etc, it pays to invest in properly engineered hardware, backed up by a company willing to service it on short notice. WB hardware may still make sense for desktops, if your environment keeps the data in non-local storage, so that a new desktop can be dropped, booted, and put into production immediately. Never with servers.

    We adopted an informal, simple, but effective policy: Do not buy any machine that doesn't come with a three-year warranty, or hard-drive that doesn't come with a five year warranty.

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  5. Datacenter Experience by binaryspiral · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work in a fairly large datacenter, where I help support many of our colocated customer's equipment. Some of which we sell and maintain, some of which they purchase and colocate. I've seen a good mix of generic servers that were custom built because there was no pre-built options available. But when it comes to support - there are few options when things go down.

    Motherboard company blames ram, ram company blames raid card manufacturer, raid card says it's a bad firmware version of the motherboard... two hours later, server is still down. Who's going to let us swap out a motherboard just to see if it works?

    I don't see a price advantage to whitebox servers compared to modern server hardware from the big names. Anyone who's just looking at the price tag is fooling themselves.

    Dell's hardware is unimpressive, I'll give a nod to the previous responder who mentioned that. And storage subsystems are still insane. Even with the evolution of SATA for slower mass storage, cost/MB is still too high with these subsystems.

    Beware of a name brand's inexpensive servers. Some of the rock bottom units are cheap, but they lack some of the basics like raid, hot swap drives, expandability... On the bright side, even if you go with these cheap units, you'll still have service and support from a major player.

  6. It's not the color of the box by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're not saying "Buy white box." You're saying, "buy from a good white box vendor." And how many of those are out there? From what I've seen, not that many.

    Besides, by depending on this guy, you've created a one-man point of failure. What happens when this guy gets sick or goes on vacation? Where's your immediate response then?

    Even if he never gets sick or takes time off, he's not going to be able to sustain this level of service. His own good reputation will work against him. He's obviously one of those people who has to do everything himself. He's probably not very good at delegating or training, so he's never going to be able to scale up his operation. So unless he starts turning away business and dropping customers when they get too big for him to handle, he's going to get in out of his depth.

    If I were in your shoes, I'd want my hardware needs met by a solid organization, once I could count on not just now, but years from now. And that has to do with people, not with where the boxes are assembled.

  7. Power Supplies in Generics by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Decent machines, but the power-supplies weren't up to the 24x7 operation and tended to eventually have the fans sieze up, causing the ps to overheat.

    Oh yeah, big time Achilles Heel of the generic PC, assuming name brand mobo and stuff.

    It's just impossible to get a good power supply in a generic PC. ("Good" means built with decent quality components, like the Astecs and Lambdas you'll find in proprietary systems. It does not mean "Comes with a ThermalTake Fan and is the choice of 14-year-olds and overclockers!".)

    My best success was based on a simple formula: the power-to-weight ratio. Buy the heaviest supply marked with a given advertised wattage rating.

    Then, for server use, step 2 is to open up the supply and replace all the made-in-Bangladesh-or-Taiwan-or-China electrolytic capacitors with Spragues or Nichicons rated AT LEAST 1.5x the voltage ratings of the capacitors which were in there. And then out comes the no-name 12V fan, only to be replaced with a (loud! expensive! moves a hell of a lot of air! lasts forever!) Comair Rotron 120V fan running directly off the power line. Also gives you a chance to fix the *many* cold solder joints you're likely to find in commodity power supplies. All told, usually under an hour per supply, with the new fan often costing more than the supply!

    Since I started doing this, I haven't had a single failure of one of my white-box server supplies.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.