Law Requires Italian Web Cafes to Record ID
Armadni General writes "CNN is reporting that a new Italian law requires that all businesses offering public internet access, such as web cafes, to identify and record all customers. While supporters of this law trumpet its anti-terrorism potential, still others see no such advantage and bemoan this invasion of personal privacy. 'They must be able, if necessary, to track the sites visited by their clients. [...] Contents of people's e-mail is, however, supposed to remain private and can only be made available to law enforcement through a court order. Italy also obliges telecommunications companies to keep traffic data and European ministers agreed last week to require the carriers to retain records of calls and e-mails for a maximum of two years. The European Parliament's two largest groups endorsed the data retention initiative on Wednesday despite complaints from privacy advocates and telecoms, and the full body is expected to adopt a bill next week.'"
It's just bad to to have to submit to this law... /. is the very bottm... :(
But having to read it on
Grammar Zealots: please spare a non-english writer (lastknight dot com)
It's about data mining, it's about control... they want to be able to have access to unlimited information at our expense. Right now governments are pushing their authority as far as they can, just to see how far they CAN go. And apparently they can do whatever the fsck they want.
As a Frenchman, I had wished that Europe in general would remain a beacon of personal freedom while the U.S. ate away its people's freedom in the name of "freedom" (Patriot Act, anyone?). But unfortunately the reality of things is quite different.
The law needs to pass the Corkey test. What happens when someone of a low IQ decides to follow the instructions of "plug and play". I would suspect the manufacturers to be more responsible that the end user. For example, what about when grandma decides to take home a wireless router and she does not secure it and someone uses it for an illegal purpose? How will the court convict someone who can't program a VCR? Where is the Mens Rea (guilty mind)? Sure, the act might be there, but was the intent?
The only other option is to force everyone to get a special license to use this kind of equipment. If wi-fi is that dangerous, then govenment might do that. And I'm sure they could think of a nice name for the tax... "Defending on-line liberty act".
If cable companies are moving to digital content with television, it is only one step away from securing their whole network, so that nobody unauthorized can get on. Everything will be DRM'ed, and the network will be closed.
I can see Congress passing a law to where you must present ID that conforms to the coming Real ID Act of 2005 before connecting to the Internet at a public conveyance. No more anonymous connections here in the USA such as going into libraries or places that offer free Internet.
What happens when someone of a low IQ decides to follow the instructions of "plug and play". I would suspect the manufacturers to be more responsible that the end user. For example, what about when grandma decides to take home a wireless router and she does not secure it and someone uses it for an illegal purpose?
Someone may be able to get away with that defense once or twice; after that, manufacturers will put big warning labels in their manuals and make the defaults more secure (that's already happening, actually).
How will the court convict someone who can't program a VCR? Where is the Mens Rea (guilty mind)? Sure, the act might be there, but was the intent?
Intent is not necessary; carelessness that harms others is sufficient for legal consequences and responsibility.
If cable companies are moving to digital content with television, it is only one step away from securing their whole network, so that nobody unauthorized can get on. Everything will be DRM'ed, and the network will be closed.
The more people behave irresponsibly with digital content, the more of an excuse those companies have. So, don't give these people an excuse.