Two Open Document Standards Better Than One?
tsa writes "Microsoft says that the consumers should have the choice between multiple open standards for documents." From the article: "Microsoft's Yates said that OpenDocument and Open XML come from very different design points. 'In the future at some point there will be convergence,' he said. In the near term, the transition period from proprietary document formats to Open XML-based ones will be 'messy and complex,' he added. 'Competition between standards we believe is a very good thing.'"
"standards are great, everyone should have one."
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
so up yours.
Laws are for people with no friends.
<html>
/* Style Definitions */
d y lang=EN>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:595.3pt 841.9pt;
margin:2.0cm 42.5pt 2.0cm 3.0cm;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<bo
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Idiot</span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Ah yes, the 'Tower of Babel' defense - Completely screw up the ability to communicate clearly by introducing another competing way.
Also known as "StirStick of Muddy Water +5"
So much for historians trying to figure out the years 2006 to 2012... How very non-altruistic of Microsoft. How very against the basic tenets of Information Systems.
It's just marketing BS. Bleh!
For any flavor of Marzipan, just use a comparable amount of sand. Should taste about the same.
Get it yourself.
-Jesus
Had to be done
A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)