Slashdot Mirror


The Return of the Commodore?

PseudoSapien writes "A Dutch consumer media company is hoping it can tap the power of the VIC 20, the PET and the Commodore 64 to launch a new wave of products, including a home media center device and a portable GPS (Global Positioning System) unit and media player. They're talking about Resurrecting Commodore." From the article: "Commodore is far from the first company to try to revive a once-popular tech brand. The Amiga, Commodore's onetime PC brand, has had its own decades-long history as fans tried to preserve both the computer's operating system and brand despite the lack of strong corporate backing."

20 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. So basically, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some Dutch company bought rights to use the commodore name and logo and is stamping it on some Chinese made OEM products?

  2. Re:Atari on the upswing! by EEBaum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Atari was bought out by French game publisher Infogrames a few years back, which uses the Atari name purely because people have a history with it. There's no Atari left in Atari.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  3. Oh no! by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't we just let the dead rest in peace anymore? I loved both my C=64 and my Amiga, but they're history. This is just marketing/branding, it has nothing to do with the original products, nor it's spirit.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  4. pfft by know1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    if you want real power you need a spectrum with a massive 128k of memory and a top of the range built in tape drive

  5. Open Office? by rolypolyman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The good news: It will run Open Office. The bad news: The Open Office suite will come on 382 floppy disks.

  6. Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So... This isn't Commodore, they aren't using old Commodore tech, they're just hoping that people are going to buy something because of the name.

    I doubt this will work very well. Once people realise the association is fake, the products had better be very good, or else people will be angry that their good memories have been compromised, and they will be *less* satisfied than if they'd just bought a Brand Nobody product.

    I think it's unlikely the products will be any good, or else they wouldn't have felt the need to tack any brand they could get their hands on as a way to promote them. Think of the ratio of good film tie-in games to bad.

    Maybe they will make good use of the name, maybe they have the most wonderful products ever, but they are one wrong step from becoming unwanted graverobbers.

  7. Simple solution by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  8. Re:How about by wfberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just don't publish programs in magazines. That really was a painful and stupid way to distrubute software.

    It also happened to be the only viable way to distribute software, economically atleast.


    Actually, in The Netherlands there was a programme on radio that broadcast data tapes (!). Just tape the radio show to cassette, run a translator from BASICODE (which was the "univeral" basic dialect the broadcasts were in) to your home computer's very own basic dialect, and you were in business. The show was called NOS HobbyScoop if I recall correctly.

    Also, I recollect (fondly) an issue of MSX Magazine which had a flexi disc record (you know, like one of them vinyl records your grandaddy used to have, but the flexi disc was a superthin version of this) which you also copied onto cassette to load onto your machine.

    Later on I even became aware of broadcasts of computer data using Teletext pages on Rai Uno (Italian tv - teletext is broadcast in the superfluent scanlines of PAL television, much like closed captioning is broadcast in the extra scanlines of NTSC); these were also targetted, at first, at home computer user, and only later at PC users (but by then, BBSes were the norm).

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  9. Ohhhhh - Memories by Dethboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Typing, typing, typing, typing, save to tape.
    Typing, typing, typing, typing, save to tape.
    Typing, typing, typing, typing, save to tape.
    Typing, typing, typing, typing, save to tape.
    Unplug computer from TV and watch news.
    Plug in computer to TV and continue!

  10. Relevant earlier article: by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative
    Commodore brand purchased by US company
    Looks like they're now being described a Dutch company with an American branch.

    Meantime, the 30-in-1 C64 joystick built by an amazing C64 developer to be hackable to allow keyboard and disk drive hookup is still $30 or $26/ea for two, thank-you-very-much. And it looks like there's a new version to be released soon too!
    --
    Slashcode bug # 497457 - unfixed since December 2001 - Go look it up!
    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  11. Re:I won't be the last to say... by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's a Commodore?

    You fail as a first officer.

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  12. Re:Ok, but why... by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I actually think C= has potential as a gamer's brand like Voodoo or Alienware.

    A lot of people who grew up with C=64s are adults with money now who want high-quality gaming gear.

    Just think about the commercials:

    Fade in old-style C= logo, maybe some old-skool tv shots of people playing around with something on a C=64. Then an explosion and some new-style C= logo glowing or perhaps crackling with electricity behind it. Caption (or voiceover): "It's Back..."

    --

    +++ATH0
  13. What's in a name? by eyebits · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is a name really worth? They spent millions on the Commodore name...and an old name at that. It is hard to believe. I don't buy a product because of a name. I buy a product because of its features and design. Yes, I do look at the reputation of a company and reputations are associated with names, but there is no relationship between this new Commodore and the old one so no prior reputation autmatically follows. Will people actually buy more product because they chose to use the Commodore name? My belief is that they won't. Yet, why would this company spend millions on the name if they didn't think it would help them? What do they know that I don't? I just can't wrap my head around it.

  14. This isn't Commodore. by Caspian · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From TFA:
    "The Commodore Navigator is a Windows CE-based portable device..."

    I stopped reading here.

    I don't know what these people are doing with the Commodore name, but whatever it is, it isn't Commodore.
    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  15. Re:I won't be the last to say... by Feneric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um, just the company that created the single most successful model of computer ever (the C64); had a bunch of other very successful models (the C128, the VIC-20, the PET, the Amiga 2000, the Amiga 500); is generally acknowledged for inventing multimedia (with the Amiga 1000); had switchable GUIs, multiple processors, independent graphics processors, decent (stereo) sound and graphics, and scripting capabilities back before most other computer platforms even thought about such things; had reliably chainable external hardware well before USB; etc. Most of the best programmers I know today started on one of the Commodore series.

  16. Re:I won't be the last to say... by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

    You kids. Remember loading the terminal driver for the 33ASR on front panel register switches, then bootstrapping from paper tape? Remember playing Star Trek games that printed out the entire board after every turn?

    Remember where i put my teeth?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Portable GPS? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't a non-portable GPS be kinda pointless? I'm seeing a big rock with "You are here" carved on it.

  18. 8 bit is back! by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Informative

    But it's not back as a 'full' or 'real' computer. It's back as a microcontroller. In either its Atmel AVR or Microchip PIC format.

      What has brought it back is the integration of all the minimum memory resources and I/O into the chip itself. That, and the reduction of cost for the 8-bit 'system' from nearly a thousand dollars twenty years ago to about ten dollars today (for CPU, minimal LCD display, and floppy storage.)

        Gates-style BASIC is rarely used on new AVRs and PICs, but it is available for the PIC in the BASIC Stamp device.

        Eight Bitters are not used as stand-alone home computers but as controllers that intelligently interact and manipulate other machines and sensors. But the -feeling- of raw control; and the wonder of being able to create or reconfigure the operation of a machine through typing instuctions that determine what the machine will do; this feeling remains the same as it was twenty years ago. It's just much cheaper now.

        It's also much easier. Both Atmel and Microchip freely distribute high quality development tools for their devices on the web for Windows PCs. And the memory itself is far more easier to use. No more expensive ultra-violet light EPROM erasers. The program is stored in internal Flash that can be rewritten tens of thousands of times. No more $10000 in-circuit-emulators to figure out what the chip is doing when it stops working. With modern JTAG interfaces, every chip has an ICE built in. Even the most complex program can be debugged with a $39 (or less home brew) JTAG-ICE and the factory-supplied free development system programs.

        My favorites are the Tiny AVRs. These are eight pin DIP chips that sell for about $1 each. They program through the PC parallel port. They have multi-channel 10-bit Analog-to-Digital convertors built in. (Try finding a 10-bit dedicated ADC chip for $1!) They run at 20 MIPS (about 20 times faster than the Commodore 64) with internal system clock generators, no crystals needed, and the speed can be fine tuned. And they have a flexible, easy-to-use, and easy-to-learn instruction set.

        There are even rock-bottom level Tiny AVRs (like the Tiny11) that sell for forty cents each. I use one to play a MIDI tone module with a cheap surplus PS2 PC keyboard. It reads the serial logic signals sent out from each keypress and release and transforms them into MIDI Note On/Off messages. Not bad from a 40 cent CPU.

        And a 20MIPS CPU for $1 can replace a whole board of TTL chips. Sure so can a GAL or PLD for the same price. But the AVR can switch into power-down mode when not being used and burn only microAmps of current. It uses only about 10 milliAmps at full 20MIPS speed and a third of that when running at, yes, 1.8 volts! Try that with a GAL, good luck Chuck!

        Plus there are lots of people on the specialized web sites from whom to get advice when you get completely stuck on something that makes no sense. Another thing that wasn't around for Eight bitters twenty years ago.

        The 8-bit world is alive and dazzling well. It's just very quiet and no longer gets any media coverage as being the 'future' in the way that it was covered by the media in the Commodore and Atari years. It's still rockin'.

  19. Commodore's return... by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Informative

    This news hit the C64 scene HARD a while ago. The first they did is announce that everyone playing C64 games on emulators was stealing from them since they now owned the name and demanded that they stop. The second thing was to announce an official C64 emulator and that they would sell the old games for it.

    I would think their first step should not be to alienate every single interested person in the world. Last I heard, they were completely unrepentant. The Commodore name is going to be a huge money-sink for these people if they don't VERY quickly smarten up and ask their customers what they want.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  20. A Modest Proposal by Prototerm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine what would happen if somebody really did produce a modern-day equivalent to the commodore 64.

    1. The C64 had all of its OS in ROM, which meant :
            a) No patching could be done after manufacture, so it had to be right the first time
            b) No unnecessary features could be added to the OS -- an add-on was required
            c) Virus and Root kits were possible, by copying ROM to RAM first and modifying the copied code, but could not survive a cold boot.
            d) Instant on
    2. The C64 didn't use a native GUI, or DOS or a Unix shell, but the BASIC computer language (also in ROM). Anyone who learned to use the computer at all, was actually using a real computer language. Someone wrote a version of DOS for the 64, and people laughed at him. Who needs DOS when you have full BASIC as the command line?

    3. A small tweak to the C64's screen editor converted it into a full screen editor that scrolled BASIC programs in both direction.

    4. It used a standard TV for video output.

    Now, I know this Dutch company is just using the Commodore name, but if you didn't have to worry about backward compatibility, what would a 21st Century version of the Commodore look like?

    1. The OS written in 100% optimized machine language (not C++ or any other high-level language) and stored in ROM, so it could not be changed by malware (not even Sony's). The computer would, therefore, be instant-on.
    2. The computer would power-up with a command-line window using some sort of easy-to-use language (any suggestions for something your Mom would be able to handle?)
    3. The command-line would appear on a GUI screen of some sort (perhaps something like the XBox-360's?), and be a full-blown GUI text editor with syntax highlighting.
    4. Connect natively to an HDTV, with settings for multiple resolutions including 1080p
    5. Native output for 5.1 and 7.1 surround sound as well as stereo.
    6. Dual-format HD DVD player/recorder
    7. Native wireless networking
    8. Native wireless keyboard, pointer (mouse, pad, whatever), and game controllers
    9. Optional SATA hard drive
    10. Optional model with built-in integrated HDTV receiver and PVR software

    Anything I missed in this fantasy machine? Use a 64 bit CPU, and you can even call it a C-64! Now, not having played with one, I can't say how close this is to a real-life Xbox360, or a PS3, but I don't think either one is intended to be a computer, and I know Microsoft would have a fit trying to write optimized assembly code that worked right the first time, without patches or bloat. As for Sony, we know that they'll probably build their malware right into the PS3 from the beginning to save us all the trouble of installing it for them

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)