Slashdot Mirror


Little Red Book Draws Government Attention

narcolepticjim writes "An unnamed Dartmouth student was visited by Homeland Security for requesting a copy of Mao Zedong's Little Red Book for a class project." From the article: "The student, who was completing a research paper on Communism for Professor Pontbriand's class on fascism and totalitarianism, filled out a form for the request, leaving his name, address, phone number and Social Security number. He was later visited at his parents' home in New Bedford by two agents of the Department of Homeland Security, the professors said."

28 of 1,088 comments (clear)

  1. And if you are lonely this holiday season... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are you lonely? Looking for some company this holiday season? Follow this link and you too can schedule a visit from Uncle Sam...

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/offer-listing/083 512388X/ref=dp_olp_2//102-9865629-6948961?conditio n=all

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
    1. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmmm... No one has shown up yet. Maybe they aren't actually watchi...

      --
      Register the editry.
    2. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even though it was voted against, Bush has stated that he will continue to authorize illegal phone taps and other forms of spycraft on US citizins. NYTimes article here He was, in fact, filled with rage at the tresonous liberal media who dared to leak the fact that he is authorizing such illegal activities in the first place, and that they may well have murdered innocent people through their deplorable actions. :)

      This comes right on the heels of the use of torture being approved by the Bush-McCain agreement. Although on its surface it appears to ban the use of torture by US personnel, it in fact grants them 100% immunity from any problems that may arise from the use of torture, under the constraint that they must have reason to believe that such torture is an order. Standing orders are any and all means are authorised, therefore, this law grants immunity from prosecution or court martial to any US troops or CIA agents who with to torture or execute to gain information. Finally, the house and senate have both backed a measure that will make evidence gained through torture admisable in court, as well as holding people, both citizins and not, indefinatly without trial, and without access to a lawyer.

      So there you have it. Bush is overriding the Judicial branch and issuing warrants himself, torture is legal, and evidence tortured out of a suspect is admissible in court, you have no right to a speedy trial, nor to confront witnesses. What a week! Ammendments lost this week: I, IV, V, VI, VIII.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    3. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

      This illegal spying and stuff has been going on since before bush was in office. Actually it isn't illegal either but that another story.

      We have always had agreements with other countries to spy and tap phone conversations. If something interesting is found they alert the proper authorities. This was automated around 1997 and now key words are caught and automated recording takes place. Typically, our agreements with the other countries allow them to collect the data on US citizens while we collect on their citizens. This gives the appearance of the government not having to deal with the constitution.

      This project is commonly refereed to as Echelon Here is a tad bit more info on it

      The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authorized spying and searches in terrorist/national security and other related matters regardless of the nationality or location of the person(s) being spied on. Originally this act intended for a court consisting of around 11 members to approve the actions. This court regularly reports to congress. Unfortunately (fortunately depending on your outlook), in 1979, President Carter decided that under certain circumstances could allow government officials to bypass these procedures. This was probably a reaction to the hostage crisis during his term. President Clinton expanded this a little in '95. Bush using the processes from these executive orders changed the policy being used to take advantage of them. Unlike Carter and Clinton, his provision were made into law by provisions in the patriot act.. Your probably right in that these executive orders go against the constitution but until they are successfully challenged, they are law and therefore legal. (That doesn't mean it rite though.)

      As for the ban on torture loophole? I think you are misreading somethign here. All this deal did was say that interrogators accused of using improper methods could offer as a defense that they were acting on orders that a reasonable person would believe to be lawful. This doesn't mean that i could order you to starve a person until they talk and you would get away with it. What it does say is that if an order is lawful to a reasonable person you can use that as a defense. This means if i order you to wake the prisoner at different time in the night to disrupt thier sleeping habits and confuse them, as long as a reasonable person wouldn't consider that torture, you wouldn't get in trouble. Imunity isn't even mentioned either. This is a purposed bill too, it hasn't made it's way into law and needs to be cleared with debate before it becomes law.

      I know it is fun to bash Bush and the current administration. People always do it when thier party isn't in control. Lets be honest here and bash him for stuff that needs to be bashed. Saying we can toruture people even though existing law says we cannot is stretching the truth a bit. This doen't mean it hasn't happend and if it did, those resoncible should be presecuted. Saying ilegal wire taps or ilegal spying isn't being truthfull either. The facilities that made it possible were put in place well before bush or his cronies came to power. Under current law, regular law enforcment have to get permision from a judge (well except for patriot act provisions). But we can see were government officials aren't held to that law unnder certain circumstances. Is it right that government officials can spy on it's citizens without going thru the regular chanels? Probably not but that doesn't mean it is not legal.

      In case anyone is wondering, executive

    4. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "So how bad is it?"

      Supposedly some of it includes rape, including that of children held captive. One of the videos includes a 15 year old boy being raped by one of the employees according to a reporter that claims to have seen it. Good God, I hope that it's not true.

      I know that's not what you want to read, but you asked.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    5. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I know it is fun to bash Bush and the current administration. People always do it when thier party isn't in control. "

      Actually it is the most painful thing to have to speak out about presidential malfeasance ( Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official. )

      There are some constitutional issues here about illegal search and seizure that the Federal courts will undoubtedly have to deal with.

      This administration plainly want the freedom to torture anyone that can provide them information about their enemies (not necessarily my enemies or your enemies but the enemies that the administration percieves as enemies to the State or themselves or their interests). This is clearly shown by there research and stance (a stretch) that they can legally torture some people. These people are "enemy combatants" and who determains who are enemy combatants? The White House. There seems to be a trail of the practices of torture at Gitmo were transfered to IRAQ with the visit of one of the Gitmo people in charge of that sort of thing. Now we find that the CIA probably has had secret prisons that detained and possible tortured individuals.

      There is a deep morality issue here. Not whether something is legal but the very idea that our elected leader would treat anyone in the world with the reckless disregard that seems to be the case. The Geneva convention sets up some standards for the treatement of prisoners of war (people remember like you and me, with a mother and father, brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, with maybe different ideas (which our Constitution protects here), or a different religion (which our Constitution protects here). But maybe just an asshole set of demagogic leaders which have issues with our ... leaders. They are still people. The Geneva convention was set in place as much a protection for our own citizens that are captured in a conflict as it is just a moral guidline for human treatment of people (that happen to be cannon fodder in a conflict).

      Back to my point. It is my opinion that that attitude and the carrying out of that attitude by action to spy on our citizens, torture individuals (certainly setting it up so our military and intellegence arm felt that it was alright to do) constitures wrong doing and missconduct of a public official. That kind of conduct should be held up to legal and constitutional standard and possibly even the international court (funny how this administration did not want to have anything to do with the international court).

      We are having to deal not only with the fundemetalism abroad but here at home.

      So it is not fun to bash Bush. It is painful and sad not only that these things seem to have been done. But the destroying in 5 short years what it took 200+ years to establish in the world as a moral authority.

      Don't get hung up on the legal issue too much or what others have done. Bush has to live with and answer for His actions and his actions alone. If he does not want the critisim, don't torture people and don't spy on us, and certainly don't send agents out to interview the parents of a boy that ordered a copy of one of the worlds most infuential political books!

    6. Re:And if you are lonely this holiday season... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 5, Interesting
      IANAL and in fact am not even an American, but I am a gun enthusiast and politically conservative. (in that I believe in a comparatively small government with very clearly defined roles and limitations) As such, I have read a lot over the years about about personal liberty vs public security as it applies to gun and privacy laws in the USA. Two quotes come immediately to mind, one which I quote exactly, the other I paraphrase from an article in Guns & Ammo some years ago. (feel free to correct me if I err significantly)

      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure." (Thomas Jefferson)

      "All freedom and all security in this country rely utterly on three things, the right to free speech, the right to vote anonymously and the right to bear arms. Everything else is meaningless without those three. " (Lt Col. Jeff Cooper, Marines(ret))

      I had never shared the viewpoint of pro-gun doomsayers who warned that losing the right to bear arms would *inevitably* lead to a further erosion of all other rights, but in light of the past years revelations regarding the Bush administration's policies, I have been forced to change my opinion. The right to free speech : gone The right to free assembly : gone (see the Seattle WTO protests of '99) The right to vote : rendered meaningless. (see the Florida scandals and the related but underreported scandals with absentee ballots and the ballots of overseas servicemen The right to bear arms : been crippled for years at the state and federal levels. The right to freedom from discrimation regardless of race, creed, color(sic) faith, sexual orientation or physical ability. gone (ethnic/religous profiling has been a news headline for years and the current administration is clearly biased against same-sex couples) Slashdotters, being largely IT people, are naturally more interested in how the Bush administrations reindeer games are affecting things like access to information, privacy and the right to due process. I think it would also be worthwhile to check out a well written article on how the Second Amendment is involved in all this: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/050 9/

      I'm wondering, where is this "Land of the Free and home of the Brave" I have heard so much about?

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  2. Well, hey... by AEton · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...at least he got material for his research paper on fascism and totalitarianism.

    Thanks, I'll be here all day.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:Well, hey... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Funny
      Thanks, I'll be here all day.

      Don't be so sure of that.

      Yours,
      The NSA

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  3. This is unfortunately predictable by nebaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, it's not as though this kind of thing is unexpected. Once the
    government is given power, it is human nature to abuse it. What I
    don't understand is why people fall hook, line, and sinker, for the
    same techniques throughout history over and over again.

    1) Instill fear in the population somehow, by either orchestating or latching on to
    a catastrophic event,
    2) Tell the population that you will take care of it, blame enemies of the state,
    3) Go to war, claim critics of the war are unpatriotic, out of touch, part of an "elite".

    This is all classic power grab politics, and yet it happens again and again in
    history.

    Why do people not learn from history? It is clear that those in power have a
    vested interest in having a sheeple populace. A critical thinking, well informed
    electorate, is the biggest enemy to would be dictators in a democratic society.

    Start with the children. I guess fear really is the mind killer. And, at the risk of
    pulling a Godwin, two quotes from Hermann Goering, leader of Hitler's Luttewaffe.

    "Education is dangerous - Every educated person is a future enemy"

    "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."

    Finally, just a minor nit. The submitter claims the student was a "Dartmouth" student, whereas the article states that the student was from "U Mass-Dartmouth".

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:This is unfortunately predictable by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do people not learn from history?

      Because they think of themselves as the "good guys", and the history they are taught (by school, Hollywood, the media, etc) portrays bad things being done by "bad guys". In reality, there is no good and bad, just a mixture of greys.

      How often is it that a movie about Nazi Germany includes the democracy that Germany had beforehand? How often do you hear about how Osama bin Laden called for jihad against Iraq for invading Kuwait? How often do you hear about how Saddam Hussein reformed Iraq into a secular state instead of a theocracy, or how he increased equality and women's rights?

      As long as people are taught that some countries are good and some countries are evil, so long as their enemies are demonised, the majority of people will continue to think of themselves as the "good guys", and therefore immune to committing atrocities and war crimes.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  4. Re:quick by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think they can visit 100,000 people.

    Not yet, but if your plan works the DHS will get increased funding for more agents to investigate the "epidemic of thinking".

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. hand me that handbasket, please... by pla · · Score: 5, Funny
    Better Together
    Buy this book with Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler today!
    Total List Price: $33.95
    Buy Together Today: $23.96
  6. Not to spoil the paranoia... by Senjutsu · · Score: 5, Informative

    but he had to fill out a form because he was requesting an inter-library loan. I don't know how your school works, if the loan department can psychically detect what you want to request and save you the trouble of filling at a form or whatever, but obviously his school works the old-fashioned way.

    Not that this excuses the utterly retarded HomeSec nonsense, of course.

    1. Re:Not to spoil the paranoia... by iabervon · · Score: 5, Funny

      They don't mind people reading the book. The reason they came after him was that he was trying to get it from the library. They won't have cared if he'd just bought it from Amazon like a normal person, but he had to try and deprive Chairman Mao's estate of their royalties, and there's no way the Feds can turn a blind eye to that, especially when they're pushing China to crack down on that sort of stuff.

  7. SSNs as College Student ID Numbers by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative
    For interlibrary loan, he presumably needed to leave his name, address, and student ID number with the library so they could contact him when the book arrived.


    There are way too many US colleges that routinely violate the privacy of their students and expose them to identity theft by using their Social Security Number as a student ID number, because it's ostensibly unique and they sometimes also need it if the student's an employee or has a government loan. Fortunately neither school I attended did that, but it's extremely common. Similarly, many US states use the SSN as a driver's license number, and all of them collect the SSN in keep it in their databases. And many medical insurance companies use SSNs as a customer ID number (HIPAA's changing that a bit, but Medicare's still based on SSNs so they usually need it anyway.) And too many companies use SSNs as an employee ID. It's appalling, but get used to it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:SSNs as College Student ID Numbers by Vilim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In Canada the equivalent of the SSN is the SIN (Social Insurance Number). In any case a few years ago it became law that you cannot be refused a service because you refuse to give out your SIN. The exception to this is that it has a valid use (Pretty well the only valid uses are ones that deal directly with taxation, for example you must give it to your employer so they can report income tax stuff correctly).

      That being said companies can ask you for your SIN but you are not obligated to give it to them. For me that meant waiting 3 weeks longer for a credit card, but at least VISA doesn't have my SIN

      The main reason why I am so paranoid about my SIN is I actually had mine stolen a while back. A company I used to work for outsourced their pension stuff. About a year ago the place got broken into and computers containing my SIN along with 30000 or so other people got stolen. The process of making sure that no one can apply for credit in my name is something I do not want to repeat.

      --
      History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
  8. Remember Kids... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    War Is Peace
    Freedom Is Slavery
    Ignorance Is Strength


    (http://www.studentsfororwell.org/)

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  9. Mao? That's nothing... by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got paid a visit for reading material that was hardly "subversive" -- it was published by the U.S. military! Read all about it here and here... I was reading the literature on a plane, to be sure, but a home visit from the feds seemed way over the top. To their credit, however, the Marshals seemed to be nice enough and they didn't seem to think I was a threat to national security, and I haven't been bothered since the visit to my house. Though I wonder whether there are now federal files on me, and whether I'm being looked at funny at the airport.

  10. Re:Memorize this phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    LOL, I tried that once and I got my ass beat by not one but four cops. When it became clear I intended to file a complaint, I was weeks later served a summons and charged with resisting arrest, an offence carrying a maximum penalty of 2 years in prison less a day based on how the prosecutor elected to proceed. The arrest I allegedly resisted was, I shit you not, for a non-criminal traffic offence carrying a $30 fine. The charges were ultimately dropped, but the point remains: police can, and will, make up any story they please to do whatever it is they want to you, especially if you lead them to believe their authority is not absolute.

  11. Re:This could never happen in America by zaphod8829 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I'm proud to be an American.
    Where at least I'm told I'm free.
    I won't forget the third-grade class
    that ingrained it into me,
    and I'll proudly stand up,
    next to you, though I don't know what it means.
    Oh, there ain't no doubt who runs this land.
    God Bless the bourgeois.

    I wrote that in my head when I had to work at K-Mart the day after the 9/11 attack, telling people constantly that we were out of flags (what, you didn't care about them a week ago?), and hearing patriotic music blaring on the radio.

    --
    .sig
  12. Re:WTF? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I cant accept things have gotten to that point, yet.

    Most German Jews showed themselves incapable of understanding their new situation. They believed it to be a transitory matter, a mere misunderstanding....
    -- Leon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate, quoted in Kornberg, "Kristallnacht and the Politics of Anti-semitism Nazi Germany"

    On November 9, 1938, I was still a German patriot. I was born into an old established family, the son of one of the most honoured German jurists and defender of rights. I myself was recognized for my twenty years of professional [legal] work, ...and, as an officer in the World War, had been awarded the Iron Cross first degree. I had borne every kind of injustice since 1933 in the hope that, at least for my children who were half-Aryan, there would be a dignified life in my homeland, when, in a few years time, this reign of terror would have spent itself. Education, experience and emotion had made a truly patriotic German out of me,.... In the face of the mounting distress outside, we maintained, within our four walls, an ever more profound and confident spiritual serenity which we inculcated in our children. We believed that we possessed the spiritual and physical strength to survive the Third Reich within Germany. Unprecedented events would have to occur to cause us to abandon this foundation upon which we had built our lives. Such events did occur in the following days.
    -- Albert Fuchs, My Experiences From November 9th to 16th, 1938 (Written on November 19, 1938 on the way from Strasbourg to Paris)

    Now I'm not saying the situation in contemporary America is anywhere as bad as the situation in Nazi Germany. What I am trying to point out is that beliefs like yours, that, it "can't be that bad", have consistently been disproven.

    Will things become as bad here as they got in Nazi Germany? Like you, I doubt it. But it can happen here. Just ask any Japanese American who sat out WWII in an American internment camp. Hell, ask any black person over age 40 who grew up in the American South, or anyone caught up in the anti-Communist hysteria of the 1950s.

    Was Soviet Communism a real threat in the 1950s? Definitely, just as terrorism is a real threat now. But just as in the 1950s, it's also an excuse for government excess and the curtailment of personal liberties in the name of "security".

    You can't belive governemtn agents are tracking people who check out books? This has all happened before, rght here in America.
  13. Why in the hell are we paying (taxes) for ... by dlasley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... the DHS to harass a college student working on a paper, especially when we have missing truckfulls of radioactive materials, unchecked illegal immigration linked to terrorism, and gross negligence in disaster preparedness? (cause, you know, let's not forget that FEMA is in the DHS now)

    <sarcasm>I'm so comforted that a noticable portion of my paycheck gets usurped for such important security concerns.</sarcasm>

    If you are a taxpaying U.S. citizen, I advise you to see how your contributions to the government are apportioned and spent.

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  14. Is anyone planning on being remotely skeptical? by general_re · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I realize that I'm apparently swimming upstream here, but I suspect that a lot of the people thundering about this are simply accepting it uncritically because they want to believe it, insofar as it confirms their particular worldview.

    So, to remind everyone, we have exactly one source for this, the professor, who is at best relaying the story secondhand to all of us - we do not have an eyewitness report, in that the student to whom this supposedly happened hasn't given his version to anyone else, including the paper in which this was reported. Hell, it doesn't look like the paper even bothered to contact DHS for any sort of comment.

    I dunno, I really think I'd like a little more info. More than just the say-so of some professor dude, who may or may not have a vested interest in telling tales.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  15. Peking Version? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, all my bullshit meters went off when I read this article. It might have happened, but I'm laying odds that it's either a hoax, or that the professor is studying to see how neo-anarchistic sites like Slashdot can uncritically accept stories about our government, or that the student successfully bullshitted the professor. Or it could be our government is actually somewhat retarded (Chairman Mao is a threat in the era of the War on Terror?) and somewhat fascist. I wouldn't be surprised either way.

    Random points, in no particular order:

    1) It's too coincidental. It happened (or was published) a day or so after secret eavesdropping policies from the administration made front page news in the New York Times.

    2) Why the hell would agents bring the book? Can you imagine NSA agents walking into a remote library (and not the local library, because he needs the extra-special "Peking" version of the world's secondly most commonly printed book) and checking out this "rare" copy of a book? *How* did they check it out? Do they keep library accounts with all the universities in the state? And, why? Just so they can wave it in his face? What did they do with it after? Just toss it in the mail? Drive it back across town or to another city to return it? It makes no sense.

    3) As best as I can tell, there's no such thing as the extra-special Peking Version of the book. My fiancee is Chinese, she's never heard of it (though she dislikes Communism, and isn't an expert on it either). Google '"Peking Version" Quotations of Chairman Mao' (or Little Red Book) and you get no results. Even the name is a bit suspect since Peking is the British name for Beijing, and the communists worked to change the name on everything to Beijing (via the uniform adoption of the standardized Pinyin system). But it's an older book, so it could be legit (the Pinyin reforms didn't happen for a while during Mao's reign). But neither does "Beijing Version" get any hits. Even the 1st edition was published in a variety of places, not just Beijing, so it would be a misnomer to call it a Peking Version.

    Here's quotes from the article:
    '"I tell my students to go to the direct source, and so he asked for the official Peking version of the book," Professor Pontbriand said. "Apparently, the Department of Homeland Security is monitoring inter-library loans, because that's what triggered the visit, as I understand it."'
    and
    "In the 1950s and '60s, during the Cultural Revolution in China, it was required reading. Although there are abridged versions available, the student asked for a version translated directly from the original book." ...which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

    There is a rare-ish 1st edition, but it's only two chapters shorter than the common 2nd edition, and the text isn't different in any meaningful way (I think there was a typo or two fixed.) Having the student request a rare 1st edition wouldn't make any sense since (beyond the obvious fact the English versions aren't rate), he doesn't speak Chinese, and there's no textual changes between the English versions based on the different editions (2 chapters were added for the 2nd edition, and one for the 3rd).

    4) The Little Red Book IS the bloody abridged version of the multi-volume Selected Works of Chairman Mao. But in the article it states the kid wanted the 'unabridged' version (of an abridged book??), and one that was "translated directly from the original version". Heh, I didn't know the Quotations of Chairman Mao (again, 2nd most published book in the world) was so rare that most American versions were, what... translated from the original Japanese? This request of the student's is nonsensical.

    5) The professor is up for tenure. Which may or may not make a lick of difference, depending on the professor. He seems cool enough, though, doing some sort of extreme history thing in Afghanistan.
    http://www.brianglynwilliams.com/

    6) Another quote: "The professors had bee

    1. Re:Peking Version? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Informative

      The professor mentioned in the story (Dr. Brian Glyn Williams) took the time to answer these points. I'm pasting it verbatim here.

      -----

      Dear Bill,
      Delighte to hear from you and I hope my response is of service. If you could post it I would be most grateful.
      I am one of the professors mentioned in your 'conspiracy theory response' (Dr. Brian Glyn Williams)With all due respect I wanted to add a few comments. A. The incident with our Univ. of Massachusetts history student happened several weeks ago, I was asked to comment on President Bush's sweeping surveillance activities only yesterday. I cited this incident as an example of the White House policies' very real applications and how they trickle down to the university level. My description of the incident was in response to an inquiry from a reporter at the Standard Times, New Bedford who called requesting a commentary and I thought it was appropriate. B. There are several key sections omitted in the version here in the USA of the Little Red Book and we are proud of our student trying to search out the original. This is exactly the sort of primary document research that makes for good history!
      C. I have tenure and I do not know how you came to the assumption that I do not, my web page brianglynwilliams.com clearly states that I am Associate Professor of History. But I do appreciate your reference to the field work I do in Afghanistan and Central Asia in trying to understand the roots of jihadism and terrorism. It is precisely this sort of cutting edge research and teaching I hope to protect. One must go to the original sources to get the facts, wether it be jihadi webpages or Mao's Little Red Book. I am hardly a liberal firebrand, I just want to carry out my research unfettered by the fear of investigation and encourage the same in my students. D. I know this student well. He is the real thing, he is mature, honest, reliable, hard-working and genuinely interested in getting to the truth on issues, i.e. he is everything we train our students to be. The fact that Dr. Bob Pontriband who is by the way a passionate educator who seeks to instill just this sort of above-and-beyond-the-call-of-duty research in his students also vouches for him lends two voices to his defense. I sincerely hope that your questions are meant to be the sort of critical inquiry we expect from our students and not some reflexive attempt to de-legitimize our reporting of what it is frankly a rather disturbing act of surveillance that does not seem to be an example of productive, preemptive counter terrorism. Sincerely,
      Dr. Brian Glyn Williams
      Associate Professor of History
      University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth

  16. Re:I don't know about "innapropriate". by TallMatthew · · Score: 5, Insightful
    He even refuses to give his name now because he "fears repercussions".

    That was the whole point. You don't send agents to knock on the front door of potential terrorists. If someone is dangerous or is believed to be dangerous, they are put under surveillance to see what's going on.

    You send agents to intimidate. Apparently people interested in world views contradictory to our own.

    Yeah, it's almost time to go.