Slashdot Mirror


360 Has Best Launch Lineup Ever?

J. Allard had a chat with Edge magazine about the launch lineup of the Xbox 360, and makes the claim that they have the best launch lineup ever associated with a console. He also talks about the overall vision they had for the launch, and how well their expectations are being met. From the article: "I think it's pretty much spot on. I spoke with someone who was very involved in the planning about three years ago - he came over for about five minutes to drop something off and ended up spending three hours looking at all the capabilities of the machine, and he said, 'Son of a gun, if you guys didn't do 95 per cent of the original vision of the machine!' And I looked at him and said, 'Well, what was the other five per cent, what did we drop?' and he said, 'I don't know. I couldn't find it!'"

33 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. not saying much by ThePepe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well that certainly doesnt say much for the previous consoles' release lineups.

  2. "Launch Lineup" includes titles not available by Sancho · · Score: 5, Informative

    at launch. That's the only reason they can make this claim without being laughed out of the universe.

    Some story awhile back detailed this and made the example of "Oblivion" as a launch title, even though it won't be available until 2006.

    Spin, spin, spin....

    1. Re:"Launch Lineup" includes titles not available by Gogo0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no -its okay.

      MS has stated before that their "launch window" is 14-weeks long. So anything between Nov 20 to about February 18 is available at "launch"!

      Really, had they not defined "launch", I would have erroneously assumed that it meant "when it is released".

      It isnt spin, theyre just making their own rules. Wow, they really kick ass with their own rules!

  3. And yet, no blockbuster games for 2005 by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least, that's what I read just a few stories down. Best launch lineup ever or the one of the worst years for games. Time to curl up into a little ball and wait it out until 2006.

  4. No. by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We'll reserve the best launch linup for NES "Duckhunt/Mario" combo catridge.

    Remember the times when consoles would come with a game that was good enough to play for very very long time before buying a new game?

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:No. by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you like those old style games than pick up a Gameboy Advance. Advance wars, Fire Emblem, Castlevania...

    2. Re:No. by wilgibson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man that promotion was great. I think I was 7 when my parents got me the NP subscription with Dragon Warrior. And, I also spent around 4 months on the game. I even remember getting the shit scared out of me when I defeated the Dragon Lord and he had a second form... good times, good times!

    3. Re:No. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strangley enough I own all of those and play on a DS. I was talking more or less about a time when the console would come with a good game... In fact the headliner of the console.

      More examples come to mind:

      SNES: Super Mario World
      Genesis: Sonic the Hedgehog etc etc

      Now if you buy a console... It doesn't come with a game nor are most of the other games a killer app so to say. I'll admit that even Nintendo has shied away from this practice. I had to purchase Mario DS seperatley and it wasn't even that great of a first game. Now it appears the DS lineup is maturing and the games really excellent now.

      This might be just the way the development cycle works now... Get the console out first and then make the good games 6 months down the road.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  5. Wow by nocent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    News flash! Microsoft executive claims Microsoft product has best launch ever!

  6. Still no Ultramix DDR support! by tepp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yawn. Wake me up when there is a single game a female gamer would like to play. Then MAYBE I'll consider buying one.

    I'm still furious that it isn't even backwards compatable with Ultramix 2 or Ultramix 3 which just came out!

    How hard is it to be backwards compatable with a simple dancing game?

    At least when I buy the PS3 I can play all my DDR games on it the first day!

    --
    Tepp
    1. Re:Still no Ultramix DDR support! by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Yawn. Wake me up when there is a single game a female gamer would like to play. Then MAYBE I'll consider buying one."

      Kameo. The best 360 launch title is also a great one for female gamers.

    2. Re:Still no Ultramix DDR support! by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Look, those arrows are a lot harder to render than it looks, leave us alone!" -- Microsoft rep.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    3. Re:Still no Ultramix DDR support! by dtfarmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll believe 100% reverse compatibility when I see it. They weren't able to do it with the PS2 and I don't think they'll do it with the PS3 either.

      They did it a hell of a lot more successfully than MS has - 99.5% backward compatibility is good enough, especially when compared to ~25% compatibility (based on about 200 of 800 releases - i think those are close for US release numbers) where titles keep coming and going with promises of 100% compatibility.

      Now if Sony does the same thing with PS3, I will be the first to criticize them. And I hope MS does eventually get close to 99% compatibility - so I can chuck my xbox and put a 360 in its place.

      And why would you buy a PS3 just to play your PS2 games?

      No one buys a PS3 just to play their PS2 games. Quit being dramatic. They buy the PS3 so they can play new games, but they want to finish their PS2 games, or they may have a favorite that they want to keep replaying. And they do not want extra consoles hooked up in order to do so, if at all possible. They want to just replace the PS2, and play everything on the PS3 - new games as well as old.

      Of course, you know this - but being a fanboy, you want to harp on .5% incompatibility like it's even comparable to MS's incompatibility rate, and denigrate someone who wants to continue playing older games even when newer ones are out. Maybe she likes some of the songs in particular versions of DDR, and since they change each release, she won't be able to dance to those songs in the PS3 DDR release, but if she can just pop the old PS2 DDR Extreme in the new PS3, viola! (or the Ultramix 2 in the 360, same diff.)

  7. Wow. by aspjunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing beats a great "Launch Linup".

    Go Spellcheck!

  8. This won't go over well on slashdot by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..but this is spot on.

    Most of the release titles were sequels of solid games (COD, Perfect Dark, EA sports games). These are phenominal launch titles because they are easier to create and already have a fan base.

    Case in point: The best release title is Kameo. It is the best adventure game ever to be released with a console spare Mario 64. It doesn't get the press it deserves because it isn't a sequel.

    My local Best Buy had every 360 claimed by 6PM on Saturday night (40 people in line), when there wasn't even 40 in line on the launch day.

    1. Re:This won't go over well on slashdot by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That is utterly laughable to anyone who's been a gamer for more than... I'll grant 4 years, at the most.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    2. Re:This won't go over well on slashdot by badasscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of the release titles were sequels of solid games (COD, Perfect Dark, EA sports games). These are phenominal launch titles because they are easier to create and already have a fan base.

      So what you're saying is that this launch features a bunch of generic, lowest-common-demoninator sequels that appeal to people who have already played the previous versions.

      This is a good launch lineup? At best, it will appeal to some of those who already own Xboxes. It will not initiate any interest in anyone beyond that. This is the problem when you have a launch lineup that's mainly a bunch of sports games and sequels.

      Good launches always have at least one "must-have" game that shows off what the new system is capable of and/or offers a new gameplay experience. They also have to have most of the popular genres represented. The Xbox 360 has most genres represented (though it's missing a few important ones, like fighting games and RPG's), but it has no must-haves whatsoever. There is nothing in the 360's launch lineup that makes me go "wow! I've never seen anything that cool before, and I have to have it." There's no equivalent to Super Mario or Soul Calibur or even the original Ridge Racer in there (no, RR6 just doesn't carry the same cachet). MS obviously thinks there is in PD0 and CoD2, but these are sequels - they are basically graphical upgrades to previous games that a lot of people have already played. They may have a few gameplay tweaks but the core gameplay is nothing we haven't seen before.

      I'd say the 360 launch lineup is middling. It's not the worst ever (go look up something like the Intellivision launch lineup), but there have been better ones, including the PS2, PS1, Coleco Vision, NES, SNES, Game Boy, N64, and Dreamcast. Not all of these systems had the same quantity as the Xbox 360 but they all had at least one game that everybody just had to play, and in some cases they had several.

      I don't think the 360 launch lineup will hurt or help the console; I think it will mainly be forgotten about once the next round of games comes out.

    3. Re:This won't go over well on slashdot by steveo777 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, a bit offtopic, but playing Halo doesn't make you a 'gamer' any more than eating a taco makes you a mexican.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  9. I beg to differ - Dreamcast by dgrgich · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dreamcast's launch lineup was much better. Virtua Fighter 3? Check. Soul Caliber? Check. A Sonic game? Check. Furthermore, games like Soul Caliber exercised the power of its hardware. A fair number - Gun, Tony Hawk:AW, others - of the launch titles of the 360 are just retextured ports.

  10. I'll post a witty response... by Progman3K · · Score: 3, Funny

    As soon as I figure out what a "Linup" is...

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  11. Not enough genre variety by Falconoffury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The 360 launch lineup was a good one, but probably not the best ever. It very much lacks variety in genres. FPSs, sports games, and racing games make up far too high a percentage of games. At least it had 3 action adventure games (Gun, Condemned, and Kameo), but not other genres such as RPG, strategy, adventure, platformer, or simulation. These are some of my favorite genres, but they are hardly being utilized down the road on the 360. I guess I'll stick with PC and PS2 for now.

    I guess the xbox 360 is great if you love sports games and shooters, but I already have most of the shooters for PC and I don't like sports games. They also copied too much off the success of PC shooters for me to consider this a great launch lineup.

  12. The Xbox 360 philosophy? by rohlfinator · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Sitting down with Xbox's J Allard six months ago, at the 360's unveiling, two things became very quickly apparent. The first was that this was a machine built around a philosophy, not a set of tech specs."
    It's this idea that makes me far more interested in the Xbox 360 than the PS3. Sony is clearly chasing the "set of tech specs" model of console design. At least Microsoft has a game plan, even if they don't follow through on it completely.

    It's hard to tell if the 360 will ever live up to this philosophy. Xbox Live and the 360 Marketplace seem to be a big focal point, and I love what they're doing with retro downloadable games (although Nintendo will undoubtedly do it better).

    But while Allard's "grand vision" of the Xbox 360 sounds amazing, it's hard for me to imagine Microsoft actually pulling it off. He claims that they're going to attract casual gamers, yet the launch lineup was aimed squarely at the same audience that bought the Xbox 1. He says that Microsoft can change their reputation through their actions, but their actions are only giving us PGR3, Halo 3, PDZ, and Kameo.

    Nintendo was able to shift the DS's audience a bit by promoting first-party games like Nintendogs, Brain Training, and Electroplankton, which should open the door to third-party "non-games". But I really can't see Microsoft doing something like that. If Microsoft made a puppy simulator, their core fanbase would go nuts. The only non-games I can imagine MS promoting would be puzzle games and card games, both of which are readily available on the PC. The 360's price point isn't very non-gamer oriented, either. Microsoft can't win over non-gamers by considering them an afterthought.

    Microsoft has good intentions, but it they're trying to cover two completely different markets in an attempt to compete with both Sony and Nintendo. Problem is, they can't do it all. One of those markets is being completely ignored, and the 360 will likely end up with the same core audience as the Xbox.
    1. Re:The Xbox 360 philosophy? by DarKnyht · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Sitting down with Xbox's J Allard six months ago, at the 360's unveiling, two things became very quickly apparent. The first was that this was a machine built around a philosophy, not a set of tech specs."

      Hmm... odd I seem to remember Microsoft and Sony getting into a peeing contest over their specs, and Nintendo being the only one to state that specs didn't matter three months ago.

      --
      Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
    2. Re:The Xbox 360 philosophy? by rohlfinator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should a casual gamer spend $300-400 on a new Xbox 360 to play Bejeweled when their PC does this already? Microsoft isn't going to attract new customers unless they provide something better than what's already out there. Ports of free PC games aren't going to cut it, especially when most of them are better suited to a keyboard and mouse.

      I'm not going to claim that MS can't earn any casual gamer support, but they've already dug themselves into a bit of a ditch. How are casual gamers going to learn about these games? Will they want to spend $300 on a new console? Will they want to spend $10 on a game they can play elsewhere for free? Will they even want to play their games on an Xbox controller? What are they going to do if they fill up their memory card with games and need to buy a $99 hard drive?

      There are still a lot of barriers to entry for the casual gamer. Maybe once the 360 drops a bit in price and accumulates a larger library on the Marketplace things will change, but right now they're not looking too hot.

  13. Re:Sometimes It Is Better Just To... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No shit.

    Over the past week all I have seen is this bald douchebag telling me how games are going to take a "new direction" and microsoft is going to be there for it. The ONLY thing xbox has going for it is xbox live, and that's not all that great.

    PLaying a puzzle game to make food for your Halo army? WTF? Does this guy not understand that these types of forced roles have been attempted before? I am not playing ANY game where I might have to handle some remedial task over and over again so my team can win. I'm not talking holding a position that no one comes to for a little while, or distributing healthpacks during a clash - I'm talking Halo: Pizza Puzzle Online. Yeah, that's neato.

    Hearing him talk about multi access portals is even worse. Mr. J - have you even thought of the technical requirements for playing in the same game world from a phone, PC, and console? It's called lowest common denominator and it will sink that dream like a stone. You could have multiple different games in the same world on different platforms but that would be the same thing we have today. Way to blow smoke dumb ass.

    I have yet to hear a Japanese Third party developer gush over your machine. Mostly I hear corp speak from a rep, not a developer. Not good dude.

    You say you're a fan of persistent worlds? Then why did you guys purchase Bungie and change their dream of what HALO was supposed to be, a persistent online fragfest warzone, into a mediocre FPS with no tactical elements to it. Oh, probably because you don't know what your talking about.

    This guy even has a writeup in POPSCI magazine about how innovative his console is. Yeah, no hard drive, selective backwards compatability, a release lineup where all the games aren't available yet, and a flawed DESIGN resulting in overheating - innovative in that maybe no one has tried to screw themselves over this hard with a new console release since the Jaguar.

    You're publicist called, she says you sound like a moron.

  14. ... but one of the worst console launches ever by RoLi · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/67478 and http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/67334 (sorry, in German), Microsoft sold only 325.902 units in North America in November, but 556.221 during the same period at the XBox1 launch.

    Also they sold something between 41.817 and 62.000 units in Japan during the first 2 days while they sold 123.000 XBox1 unit in the first 2 days.

    Seems like the XBox360 launch is even worse than that of XBox1.

  15. Re:Other 5% by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative
    N64 still has the best selection of 4-player games hands-down.
    I'm not very familiar with the N64, but I suppose Dreamcast may have a better 4-player lineup:

    AeroWings ~ Armada ~ Boku No Tennis Jinsei (JP) ~ Bomberman Online ~ Caesars Palace 2000 ~ Championship Surfer ~ Chu Chu Rocket ~ Cool Herders ~ Dead or Alive 2 ~ ECW Anarchy Rulz ~ ECW Revolution ~ ESPN International Track and Field ~ ESPN NBA 2Night ~ Fur Fighters ~ Gauntlet Legends ~ Giga Wing 2 ~ Golf Shiyouyo (JP) ~ Golf Shiyouyo 2 (JP) ~ Inhabitants ~ Le Mans 24h ~ Looney Tunes Space Race ~ Magforce Racing ~ Marvel Vs Capcom ~ Maximum Pool ~ NBA 2k, 2k1, 2k2 ~ NBA Showtime: NBA on NBC ~ Net De Tennis (JP) ~ NFL 2k, 2k1, 2k2 ~ NFL Blitz (2000) ~ NFL Quarterback Club 2000 ~ NFL Quarterback Club 2001 ~ NHL 2k, 2k1, 2k2 ~ Ooga Booga ~ Outtrigger ~ Pen Pen Tricelon ~ Power Stone 2 ~ Project Justice 2000 ~ Propeller Arena: Aviation Battle Championship ~ Quake III Arena ~ Red Dog ~ Re-Volt ~ San Francisco Rush 2049 ~ Sega Worldwide Soccer 2000 ~ Slave Zero ~ Sonic Shuffle ~ South Park Rally ~ South Park: Chef's Luv Shack ~ Spawn: In The Demons Hand ~ Star Wars: Demolition ~ SWWS Euro 2000 Edition ~ Sydney 2000 ~ Tee Off 2000 ~ Toy Commander ~ Toy Racer ~ Treasure Strike (JP) ~ UEFA Dream Soccer ~ UEFA Striker ~ Unreal Tournament ~ Vigilante 8: Second Offense ~ Virtua Athlete 2K ~ Virtua Tennis ~ Virtua Tennis 2 ~ V-Rally 2 ~ Wacky Races ~ Walt Disney World Quest: Magical Racing Tour ~ Worms Armageddon ~ Worms World Party ~ WWF Attitude ~ WWF Royal Rumble

  16. Best? I don't think so... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only launches the 360 beats are the Jaguar and the Amstrad GX4000. Thinking back to things like the SNES launch with Mario World, F-Zero, Pilotwings, Actraiser etc it's pretty clear that the 360 hasn't had a great launch. In fact its launch reminds me of the PS2- shortages, stupid prices on eBay, rushed unfinished launch titles and nothing ground breakingly original in the lineup.

    Hardly any of the 360's launch games are exclusives, those that are exclusive aren't that great and all of the games were clearly rushed out of the door in a desperate attempt to have some games on the shelf for launch. I think in the long run MS will have to concede that getting your console out the door first isn't a good idea when it means leaving a sour taste in the consumer's mouth.

  17. "Philosophy" of "innovation," no doubt by ianscot · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But while Allard's "grand vision" of the Xbox 360 sounds amazing, it's hard for me to imagine Microsoft actually pulling it off. He claims that they're going to attract casual gamers, yet the launch lineup was aimed squarely at the same audience that bought the Xbox 1. He says that Microsoft can change their reputation through their actions, but their actions are only giving us PGR3, Halo 3, PDZ, and Kameo.

    So: Does all the talk about philosophy and innovation match up with the product? If not, you can safely ignore it as PR puffery. Even within his quotes here, Allard talks about breaking new ground and then talks about hitting all his goals from three years ago. If there's a philosophy there, it's one to do with mediocrity.

    The conspicuous presence in this market that actually seems to believe in all those PR terms is Nintendo.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  18. It is a success, unless you ask J. Allard by CMiYC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTA:

    Interviewer: What was the first piece of 360 game software that you played that made you say: "Yes, that's it, that's what we were trying to accomplish"?
    J. Allard: Uh - well, in a way it hasn't happened yet, I would say.

    Interesting. The most successful console launch ever, hasn't even impressed the guy who architected it.

    Later on: These early games? They cut a lot of corners... but don't worry after knocking his own launch twice, But I still think it's the best launch line-up of any console ever. Of course he does!

  19. Re:Best System Out Right Now Is... by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, you can blow almost 500 dollars on an Xbox and a game. From what I've seen on the lineup I'm only interested in Call of Duty or King Kong (Both of which you can get on the PS2 and PC). Non exclusive titles rock!!! Especially when you can pay an extra 10 dollars for them on the 360. I'm promoting the DS to all my gamer friends this christmas. Mario Kart with the Wifi is just too damn fun and games like Kirby Canvas, Castlevania, Trauma Center are fun and you can't get them on any other system. Maybe comparing the xbox360 to the Nintendo DS is like apples to oranges but all I know is that my Nintendo DS is well worth the $130 investment. Can you say the same thing about the xbox 360?

    --


    -Dipster
  20. Re:Sometimes It Is Better Just To... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would only consider one of these statements to be praising it. Let me address these one at a time.

    "The Xbox 360 is the best solution [to delivering the highest quality gaming] at the current time," said Tecmo producer Tomonobu Itagaki.

    That would be because it is the only next gen console available at the current time. More a statement of fact than a statement of support.

    Capcom producer Keiji Inafune said the console offers plenty of potential, but how much of that gamers get to see depends on how developers use its multicore architecture. "I believe that we'll be seeing two kinds of games for a while after the Xbox 360's launch," Inafune said. "Games that feel like something on current-generation consoles and games that feel like they're Xbox 360 titles."

    Where does he endorse the XBOX 360 in that quote? He doesn't. He merely states his opinion on the scene, that some developers are going to take advantage of the next gen capabilities beyond better textures. This is a cookie cutter statement made by all developers at the time of a new hardware launch. These guys do make statements about the xbox 360, they're just not lighting themselves on fire about it.

    Says Konami producer Akari Uchida, "It's as though we need to bring the quality graphics from prerendered movies into the actual game."

    Taken out of context. Japanese 3rd party developers prefer prerenders with a layer of realtime over it. When I heard this statement it was refereing to the limited space on the game delivery medium and how that would affect their design. Now, I'm not claiming to know the originating point of this quote, but it doesn't sound to me like he is going "XBOX YAY!"

    I do concur though that they all said it would be pretty easy to develop for, I also maintain my stance that none of them are drooling all over themselves with the prospect of actually doing it.

  21. Xbox360 launches with best ever range of games... by Repton · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...shame they forgot to release the console at the same time :-/

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.