Error messages like "File or directory not found" are pretty useless, but "Error 15723" is unique when combined with the program name, sometimes even unique enough that you find the information without the program name.
Linux marketshare in web statistics has grown from about 1% ten years ago to about 2% now. That of course is still a small percentage, nevertheless it is twice as large as it was ten years ago and it now grows at a faster rate because of the privacy issues of Windows 10.
In just 3 years, Linux could breach 3%.
So yeah, Linux grows on the desktop, Linux succeeds on the desktop - it just happens at a glacial speed and will take many decades.
- Send in NGOs to destabilize countries (Ukraine, Syria) - Wage war against BOTH SIDES in Syria. - Break UN-resolutions and invade countries (Libya) - Send small groups of killers into so many countries that it's not even reported in the media anymore (Pakistan, Yemen, Uganda and certainly some others we haven't heard yet) - Bush was bad (broke international law and acted unilaterally) but Obama is much worse (did all that Bush did but he doesn't even tell anybody anymore - or do you remember a public discussion about military advisors in Uganda? Or a public discussion about financing NGOs in Syria and Ukraine?)
Basically Obama just invades anywhere on the world when he pleases. He doesn't even think it's necessary to inform anybody about it (except after the fact).
You need quite some brainwashing to see something like that as superior to anything.
So Bush/Obama invade/bomb/destabilize Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria. (Not counting the "smaller" interventions in Pakistan, Yemen, Uganda and several other places)
Now Trump wants to talk with Putin (which Hillary refuses to do, because (and I quote here) "he has no soul") would that really be so terrible?
Obama wants to wage war on BOTH SIDES in the Syrian civil war. I think that tells it all and is pretty much "watch the world burn".
But I guess Rosi O'Donnell's feelings are more important than world peace for the brainwashed. Sad but true.
What you don't seem to understand is that "most" is not enough for Microsoft.
Yes, "most" Windows users will just upgrade to Windows 10. But they still bleed marketshare because even when 70% (i.e. "most") Windows users accept Windows 10, that is a massive loss for Microsoft.
Last year we had two (Heartbleed and the Bash-bug), this year we had one (so far). I am affected by none of them. (My DNS-requests only go to my ISP and I am not afraid they will hack their clients - and yes, I did patch it anyway.)
Before that we had several years without any serious one.
IIRC, the only one that ever affected me was 2002 (or so?), the big SSH vulnerability.
In all other cases some special conditions were needed for the exploit that didn't apply to me (for example the Bash-bug didn't affect any of my servers because I don't run CGI and on top the default/bin/sh points to dash and not bash.)
However every serious Linux vulnerability is immediately going through the media - because it is so rare.
In the future, these bugs seem also increasingly unlikely because people immediately check the affected packages for security vulnerabilities (and AFAIK they also fixed a couple in bash).
On 9/11 dozens of people "spilled the beans" by reporting underground explosions and 5 Israelis were arrested by the police and quietly released later on. Practically all news networks reported underground explosions.
Did it matter?
No. It's still considered a "conspiracy theory". Why should it matter when somebody "spills the beans" if the media and public just ignore it?
But they would vote for Hillary who built up ISIS while at the same time claiming to be at war with it. Similar in Libya.
The problem with liberals is that they are just too gullible and are accepting even the most hairbrained excuses from their beloved leaders.
Obama, who was hailed as great moral paragon has helped create a slave society in the 21st century just to get a lower price on Iraqi oil. And Hillary was his Secretary of State.
But of course you can't criticize him or her because that would make you racist or sexist, right?
When Hillary says that the US military just "couldn't find" ISIS' oil infrastructure for many months, liberals will believe it. When Hillary says that the US military could finally find ISIS' oil infrastructure within a few hours to drop leaflets on them to warn against Russian air strikes in order to prevent "civilian casualties", liberals will believe it. When Hillary says that she deleted her emails accidentally, liberals will believe it.
And that is basically SJW-ism in a nutshell. Gullibility mixed with pure evil.
They also buy oil from ISIS (via Turkey) while at the same time claiming to be at war with ISIS.
And they vote for Hillary Clinton who - as Secretary of State - has a lot of responsibility for that whole ISIS-situation.
Trump once said that normally a person like Hillary couldn't run, which of course is true, but Hillary's involvement with ISIS would land her on the gallows in any self-respecting country.
Anybody who votes for Hillary has no morals at all.
Forget all her corruption scandals - but can you really vote for somebody who helped create and sustain a modern slave-society, while at the same time pretending to be at war with it? I mean is there anything worse somebody can do as Secretary of State?
But the gig is up. The Russians have destroyed ISIS's oil revenue stream and they are collapsing fast.
The US air force was "unable to find" ISIS's oil infrastructure (yes, that's the official story!) except when the Russians were coming in, then they were able to find it within hours and drop leaflets on them to warn against the coming Russian airstrikes.
And that kind of politics is what the SJWs want to continue. Seriously.
Yeah, Obama and Turkey were using ISIS to get a slightly lower price on Iraqi oil (while being officially at war).
For about a year the US air force was "unable to find" the HQ of ISIS, "unable to find" the oil trucks. And all that despite the fact that numerous journalists could find said HQ.
Now the Russians went in, started bombing their HQ and even more importantly the oil trucks. The US military dropped warning leaflets to warn them against the Russian bombings ("to avoid collateral damage"), but that didn't work.
Interestingly, somehow the Americans were able to find all the soft targets of ISIS within hours/days to warn them - after being "unable to find" them so for about a year.
Game over ISIS. Without oil revenue it won't survive for very long.
To get back on topic, ISIS recently issued a fatwa about how to treat female slaves.
So Obama and Hillary, darlings of all SJWs, helped to create (and sustain) a slave-society in the 21st century.
And what do SJWs do? Vote for Hillary of course. And say that ISIS has "nothing to do with Islam".
In their hearts, SJWs are totalitarians. And every single time their efforts lead to suffering and destruction they blame their victims (which are the American taxpayers).
Irrelevant - once the mechanism is there, it will be abused.
SJWs are yearning for complete arbitrary exclusion of any other opinion. Basically they think that if only the world would become a giant echo-chamber it would be a better place.
These are seriously sick people.
Just look at "WillAffleckUW" above. It is a fact that the 1950s meant (at least in the US) a period of great prosperity and low crime.
As a result "WillAffleckUW" thinks that everybody who has something good to say about the 1950 is a aryanbrotherhoodmemberwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
You see how they can easily imagine violence or threats?
These rules are never universally applied, for example it is still allowed to harass, inimidate and demonize white people, Christianity and "traditional gender roles".
Similarily, in the official FBI crime statistics, "Hispanics" is a victim category but they are lumped into whites for perpetrators.
So when a Hispanic kills a white for racial reasons, the crime goes onto the books as a "racist white-on-white hate crime". (No joke, they really count that way in order to reach their anti-white race quotas - without Hispanics there are just too few hate crimes with white perpetrators.)
Most hate crimes are of course Hispanic on black and vice versa, so with that trick you get a ton of "white on black" and "black on hispanic" hate crimes even though whites have usually nothing to do with them.
You can call for genocide of white people in any politically correct medium and you will NOT get banned.
Oh, and they already have a pretty nice parasitic climatology industry, it's was about $8.8 billion in 2010, currently probably substantially more than that.
Slashdot Mirror
What have you ever gotten out of an error code?
A search term that can be used in Google?
Error messages like "File or directory not found" are pretty useless, but "Error 15723" is unique when combined with the program name, sometimes even unique enough that you find the information without the program name.
That's nonsense.
Linux marketshare in web statistics has grown from about 1% ten years ago to about 2% now. That of course is still a small percentage, nevertheless it is twice as large as it was ten years ago and it now grows at a faster rate because of the privacy issues of Windows 10.
In just 3 years, Linux could breach 3%.
So yeah, Linux grows on the desktop, Linux succeeds on the desktop - it just happens at a glacial speed and will take many decades.
But he was rude to Rosie O'Donnell, so we'd rather vote for yet another warmongering Republicrat who is just like Bush/Obama!
Obama-style:
- Send in NGOs to destabilize countries (Ukraine, Syria)
- Wage war against BOTH SIDES in Syria.
- Break UN-resolutions and invade countries (Libya)
- Send small groups of killers into so many countries that it's not even reported in the media anymore (Pakistan, Yemen, Uganda and certainly some others we haven't heard yet)
- Bush was bad (broke international law and acted unilaterally) but Obama is much worse (did all that Bush did but he doesn't even tell anybody anymore - or do you remember a public discussion about military advisors in Uganda? Or a public discussion about financing NGOs in Syria and Ukraine?)
Basically Obama just invades anywhere on the world when he pleases. He doesn't even think it's necessary to inform anybody about it (except after the fact).
You need quite some brainwashing to see something like that as superior to anything.
Self-hating whites think that self-mutilation is the highest form of morality.
Sanders wants to jack up the sanctions against Russia, and he also wants to continue the crazy policy of waging war against BOTH SIDES in Syria.
So Bush/Obama invade/bomb/destabilize Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria. (Not counting the "smaller" interventions in Pakistan, Yemen, Uganda and several other places)
Now Trump wants to talk with Putin (which Hillary refuses to do, because (and I quote here) "he has no soul") would that really be so terrible?
Obama wants to wage war on BOTH SIDES in the Syrian civil war. I think that tells it all and is pretty much "watch the world burn".
But I guess Rosi O'Donnell's feelings are more important than world peace for the brainwashed. Sad but true.
What you don't seem to understand is that "most" is not enough for Microsoft.
Yes, "most" Windows users will just upgrade to Windows 10. But they still bleed marketshare because even when 70% (i.e. "most") Windows users accept Windows 10, that is a massive loss for Microsoft.
Exactly. Also browser statistics show that Linux slowly but surely makes gains on the desktop. Windows 10 will drive quite a lot of people to Linux.
Last year we had two (Heartbleed and the Bash-bug), this year we had one (so far). I am affected by none of them. (My DNS-requests only go to my ISP and I am not afraid they will hack their clients - and yes, I did patch it anyway.)
Before that we had several years without any serious one.
IIRC, the only one that ever affected me was 2002 (or so?), the big SSH vulnerability.
In all other cases some special conditions were needed for the exploit that didn't apply to me (for example the Bash-bug didn't affect any of my servers because I don't run CGI and on top the default /bin/sh points to dash and not bash.)
However every serious Linux vulnerability is immediately going through the media - because it is so rare.
In the future, these bugs seem also increasingly unlikely because people immediately check the affected packages for security vulnerabilities (and AFAIK they also fixed a couple in bash).
On 9/11 dozens of people "spilled the beans" by reporting underground explosions and 5 Israelis were arrested by the police and quietly released later on. Practically all news networks reported underground explosions.
Did it matter?
No. It's still considered a "conspiracy theory". Why should it matter when somebody "spills the beans" if the media and public just ignore it?
Those poor Muslims - they rape women, blow up civilians and plunder, and the whole world doesn't want to live with them!
What's wrong with the whole world?
Rust does not have a preprocessor thus is no worthy replacement for C.
If you give non-workers a place to sleep, three meals per day but NO MONEY and NO FOOD STAMPS then nobody has to fear starvation.
And I'm sure we will see a 90% reduction in welfare dependence.
Socialism makes the lives of everybody (except the 1% elite, even when it's no longer called politburo) miserable.
To complain about that does not imply - not for one second - that you "envy" some street bum.
We can only be free if we drop ALL handouts, regardless of corporate or private.
Western society has degenerated into a big mess where everybody tries to steal from the public purse. This is not productive.
So no more theft - no more bailouts, no more subsidies, no more handouts.
Yeah right, that's why whites profit a lot from Affirmative Action and hate crime penalties are only instituted when a white person is the victim.
But they would vote for Hillary who built up ISIS while at the same time claiming to be at war with it. Similar in Libya.
The problem with liberals is that they are just too gullible and are accepting even the most hairbrained excuses from their beloved leaders.
Obama, who was hailed as great moral paragon has helped create a slave society in the 21st century just to get a lower price on Iraqi oil. And Hillary was his Secretary of State.
But of course you can't criticize him or her because that would make you racist or sexist, right?
When Hillary says that the US military just "couldn't find" ISIS' oil infrastructure for many months, liberals will believe it.
When Hillary says that the US military could finally find ISIS' oil infrastructure within a few hours to drop leaflets on them to warn against Russian air strikes in order to prevent "civilian casualties", liberals will believe it.
When Hillary says that she deleted her emails accidentally, liberals will believe it.
And that is basically SJW-ism in a nutshell. Gullibility mixed with pure evil.
They also buy oil from ISIS (via Turkey) while at the same time claiming to be at war with ISIS.
And they vote for Hillary Clinton who - as Secretary of State - has a lot of responsibility for that whole ISIS-situation.
Trump once said that normally a person like Hillary couldn't run, which of course is true, but Hillary's involvement with ISIS would land her on the gallows in any self-respecting country.
Anybody who votes for Hillary has no morals at all.
Forget all her corruption scandals - but can you really vote for somebody who helped create and sustain a modern slave-society, while at the same time pretending to be at war with it? I mean is there anything worse somebody can do as Secretary of State?
But the gig is up. The Russians have destroyed ISIS's oil revenue stream and they are collapsing fast.
The US air force was "unable to find" ISIS's oil infrastructure (yes, that's the official story!) except when the Russians were coming in, then they were able to find it within hours and drop leaflets on them to warn against the coming Russian airstrikes.
And that kind of politics is what the SJWs want to continue. Seriously.
Yeah, Obama and Turkey were using ISIS to get a slightly lower price on Iraqi oil (while being officially at war).
For about a year the US air force was "unable to find" the HQ of ISIS, "unable to find" the oil trucks. And all that despite the fact that numerous journalists could find said HQ.
Now the Russians went in, started bombing their HQ and even more importantly the oil trucks. The US military dropped warning leaflets to warn them against the Russian bombings ("to avoid collateral damage"), but that didn't work.
Interestingly, somehow the Americans were able to find all the soft targets of ISIS within hours/days to warn them - after being "unable to find" them so for about a year.
Game over ISIS. Without oil revenue it won't survive for very long.
To get back on topic, ISIS recently issued a fatwa about how to treat female slaves.
So Obama and Hillary, darlings of all SJWs, helped to create (and sustain) a slave-society in the 21st century.
And what do SJWs do? Vote for Hillary of course. And say that ISIS has "nothing to do with Islam".
In their hearts, SJWs are totalitarians. And every single time their efforts lead to suffering and destruction they blame their victims (which are the American taxpayers).
A substantial portion of the population will believe anything the media tells them.
Irrelevant - once the mechanism is there, it will be abused.
SJWs are yearning for complete arbitrary exclusion of any other opinion. Basically they think that if only the world would become a giant echo-chamber it would be a better place.
These are seriously sick people.
Just look at "WillAffleckUW" above. It is a fact that the 1950s meant (at least in the US) a period of great prosperity and low crime.
As a result "WillAffleckUW" thinks that everybody who has something good to say about the 1950 is a aryanbrotherhoodmemberwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
You see how they can easily imagine violence or threats?
Exactly.
These rules are never universally applied, for example it is still allowed to harass, inimidate and demonize white people, Christianity and "traditional gender roles".
Similarily, in the official FBI crime statistics, "Hispanics" is a victim category but they are lumped into whites for perpetrators.
So when a Hispanic kills a white for racial reasons, the crime goes onto the books as a "racist white-on-white hate crime". (No joke, they really count that way in order to reach their anti-white race quotas - without Hispanics there are just too few hate crimes with white perpetrators.)
Most hate crimes are of course Hispanic on black and vice versa, so with that trick you get a ton of "white on black" and "black on hispanic" hate crimes even though whites have usually nothing to do with them.
You can call for genocide of white people in any politically correct medium and you will NOT get banned.
... out to leech off all economies.
Fixed that for you.
Oh, and they already have a pretty nice parasitic climatology industry, it's was about $8.8 billion in 2010, currently probably substantially more than that.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/la...
That's a lot of motivation to exaggerate or lie outright about global warming (or "climate change").
Exactly, that is really the biggest security nightmare, even worse than these forced updates.