Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak Says MS Should Buy Opera

patro writes "Should MS beef up cranky old Internet Explorer for today's standards? Dvorak thinks buying Opera would be a smarter move. It works on all the major platforms including the Mac which IE won't support anymore and $400 million for it is pocket money for Microsoft."

14 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

    (filler text to get around message filters)

  2. Yeah, well... by killmenow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Dvorak is a hack...so, there you have it.

    1. Re:Yeah, well... by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...Dvorak is a hack...so, there you have it.

      You got modded as a troll, but your comment is 100% correct. Dvorak has made a career out of spouting sensational bullshit (which even he must know is nonsense) in order to generate more hits for his site. He's one of the most successful trolls on all of the Internet.

      If the editors are going to pay any attention whatsoever to submissions about his articles (and they ought not), then Slashdot needs a "Dvorak" category, so we can filter it out.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Yeah, well... by sanosuke76 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, well, Dvorak's named after that UNPOPULAR keyboard. I'm more mainstream, my name's Bob Qwerty!

      [* disclaimer: not my real name]

      --
      My 229 is all the Sig I need http://thegunwiki.com/
  3. It works on all the major platforms... by ThatGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't want their stuff to work on all other platforms... After all, they intentionally discontinued work on IE for mac, and have bought several companies only to immediately axe their Linux offerings.

    Microsoft is not a company selling apps, Microsoft is a company selling lock-in. As long as customers are sticking with them, they don't really need to spend "pocket change" to keep up with technology.

    --
    What are you eating? isItVeg?.
  4. Great idea! by BushCheney08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! That's the best idea I've ever heard. There should be absolutely no problems shoehorning it into Vista by next year. Way to go, Dvorak! You deserve a raise!

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  5. Sure by mugnyte · · Score: 5, Funny


    Then after the "MS Opera" release, firefox would have even less competition.

  6. Dvorak has apparently forgotten.. by McNally · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dvorak has apparently forgotten all the work that Microsoft put into stuffing Internet Explorer and its components into every unlikely corner of the Windows operating systems. You can't just easily rip that out and replace it with a new browser..

  7. One problem.... by MmmmJoel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Opera can be uninstalled.

  8. Dvorak just needs to go away... by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's just another utterly clueless pundit. To have them buy Opera is to admit that they didn't have what it takes to secure and extend the thing. MS flatly won't be inclined to do that if they can help it- this suggestion is in the same class as saying MS ought to do a Linux version of MS Office.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  9. Not compatible by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unlikely. Opera isn't compatible with Microsoft's business strategy since it implements web standards.

  10. Why so much Dvorak by guaigean · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does Dvorak even make it on here? I'm not trying to troll, just noticing that every Dvorak post made is a HUGE flamewar against his ignorance in computing. I mean, sure, he can have his opinion. But why does it make slashdot EVERY single time he makes a comment?

    --
    Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
  11. Re:What the hell is the thought process here? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    What the hell is the thought process here?

    I disassembled it for you:

    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    NOP
    ...

    Fascinating, and, oh, look! Dvorak is little endian!

  12. So many errors... by Kelson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Shall I start with the bit about how Microsoft has no reason to develop Mac programs anymore becuse they can just use the Intel-based versions? He seems to have forgotten that fact that the platform is more than just a processer archtecture, there's the OS API as well. It takes a lot of glue code to get an x86 Windows app to run on x86 Linux (and even then it's rarely perfect), and the same would be true on x86 Mac.

    Then he goes off on the whole "Opera identifies itself as IE so we don't know how many people use it" bull that's been debunked over and over and over again. Opera IDs itself as IE in the same way that IE identifies itself as Netscape -- and for the same reason. If you're paying any attention at all, you can tell the difference.

    Some examples:
    Netscape 4: "Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; U)"
    IE 6: "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
    Opera 7: "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 7.50 [en]"

    You'll note that IE spoofs Netscape, that Opera spoofs IE (including the Netscape spoof), and that all three are easily distinguishable if you're looking in the right place.

    Does this guy have a clue what he's talking about?