Massive Graphics Card Review
Brian Tonka writes to tell us that rojakpot has posted a pretty comprehensive graphics card review including over 240 different desktop graphics cards. With each of the vendors given their own section and using 15 different points of comparison this should be quite a starting reference for the enthusiast and casual buyer alike.
It's a fricking table of all the cards and their specifications. It doesn't review a single card at all.
This might be helpful to some people, but it can hardly be called a review. It is just a list of specs. It doesn't even have benchmarks.
Follow-up: can Red Hat or Novell or somebody please offer a certification logo program for some of these cards? You know, a sticker that you can find on the boxes in CompUSA or something, which says that it's not going to be a stink to get running on Linux?
[
Replying to myself, I didn't notice the "NVidia" link hidden at the bottom (I looked, I swear!), which leads to XGI, etc.
There are other brands on the following pages of the article; it's just really hard to find the 'next page' link because the site's layout SUCKS.
using namespace slashdot;
troll::post();
I'm not sure if mega-texels shows true performance. I have a ATI 9700 Pro and Geforce 7800 GT, both can run games at high resolutions at the same speed, but the 7800 can run with AA/AF enabled without a performance hit.
_ viii/page18.html_ vii/page4.html
It is nice to see where GFX cards rate in games, and Toms hardware has the best link per game. Thats why I picked a GT over a GTX for 200 dollars less.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/12/02/vga_charts
and
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/07/05/vga_charts
Can somone give the useless and ad-ridden articles at rojakpot their own section, so I can filter them all out automatically? If I wanted a graphics card review that actually gave useful information, I'd visit a site with real content in that area, like Tom's hardware.
I was hoping to read up on some massive graphics cards, as I recently purchased a massive motherboard. Imagine my disappointment when I find this is merely a massive review of normal sized graphics cards.
"Massive Graphics Card Review" doesn't mean the same thing as "Massive Review of Graphics Cards".
Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
Ok seems I am the only one to see this usefull.
My application requiere shaders v2.0 and it's really boring to always type radeon radada in google to hunt for the specs to reply to questions from customers.
Also even if it will not tell you for sure that your engine will run faster on this one or this one it will at least give you a hint.
Having the OpenGL version supported from the driver would also have been nice.
In cyberspace nobody knows you're a cat!
"Where the best in technology gather."
Let me finish that.
"Where the best in technology gather, overload a server, then leave still wondering how the hell this constitutes a review."
A bit wordy, but accurate.
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/ 20/1912221&tid=126&tid=137
Yeah, thought it looked familiar...