Linux's Difficulty with Names
JohnTyler writes "This article at XYZ Computing takes a look at Linux's strange naming practices. When compared to their Window's equivalents, the names of many Linux programs are difficult to recognize and even tougher to remember. This may seem like splitting hairs, but it is actually an important usability issue. Just think, if you had to do a bit of graphic design which would be easier to pick out of the menu, GIMP or Photoshop? Or if you wanted to play a song, Media Player or xine?" The article is a bit thin, but it raises an excellent point.
Internet Explorer, Opera, Mozilla, Firefox vs. Opera, Mozilla, Firefox
Photoshop, Illustrator vs. GIMP (an app to edit photos of gimps?)
Windows Media Player, Media Player Classic vs. Totem, Mplayer, Xine, VLC
WinDVD, Windows Media Player, CyberDVD, Media Player Classic vs. Totem (totem pole?), Xine (how is this pronounced, anyway?), VLC
Windows: Notepad, Wordpad, Textpad vs. Linux: vi, Emacs, Pico
Windows Live Messenger, AIM, Trillian vs. GAIM
Windows Media Player, iTunes, Winamp vs. Beep (it only plays beeps?), Rhythmbox
iTunes, Windows Media Player vs. Sound Juicer, CDParanoia
Easy CD Creator, Nero Burning Rom vs. Toaster, Serpentine, Nero
"Sufferin' succotash."