Slashdot Mirror


Einstein Has Left the Building

Ant writes to tell us of an interesting editorial by John Horgan that is being run by the New York Times asking "will there ever be another Einstein?". The author looks at why Einstein holds such a hallowed position in public opinion and why it will be so hard for any one physicist to attain the same level of fame today. From the article: "The paradoxical answer, Gleick suggested, is that there are so many brilliant physicists alive today that it has become harder for any individual to stand apart from the pack. In other words, our perception of Einstein as a towering figure is, well, relative."

24 of 443 comments (clear)

  1. They don't make 'em.... by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Funny

    like they used to.

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
  2. As modern physicists approach Einstein's fame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they become infinitely massive. Hawking achieved 99.99999% of Einstein's fame and he ended up in a wheelchair from the stress.

  3. no need for name calling by gadzook33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gleick's just jealous (but Wolfram is livid and Feynman is rolling over in his grave).

  4. Re:Show me by toddbu · · Score: 4, Funny
    If there weren't OTHER physicists publishing similar papers first, perhaps some physicists would. That's the point.

    So is your argument that publishing quality work is a zero sum game? I bet our good friend Einstein would have loved the Internet. Then he'd have blogged about ten good papers per year.

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  5. Resume padding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are you, an immortal vampire or something?

    1. Re:Resume padding by GeffDE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, check out his ID! With one that low, he must be. D'oh!

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
  6. Re:Personality, not brains by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed, and we have such a visionary among us now, with a truly revolutionary view of the universe that will shatter the existing framework:

    http://www.timecube.com/

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  7. Didn't anyone see Family Guy? by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 3, Funny

    Einstein worked at a patent office and stole Smith's Theory of Relativity.

  8. Re:that, but also. by toddbu · · Score: 1, Funny
    That, but also, he was an interesting character. He's got a catchy tagline (E=MC2). He had funny hair.

    Chuck Norris is an interesting character. Chuck Norris has got a catchy tagline ("Guns don't kill people. Chuck Norris kills people."). Chuck Norris had funny hair. Yet Chuck Norris will never be as famous as Albert Einstein. (I've heard it rumored that Chuck Norris even discovered a new theory of relativity involving multiple universes in which Chuck Norris is even more badass than in this one, but he chose not to reveal it so that Einstein would not be overshadowed by the greatness of Chuck Norris.)

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  9. Re:Personality, not brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, what the fuck is that? That's craziness. I had to clean my brain with a Q-tip after that, and you know what came out? Brain spooge. Sorry, I have to go, there's blood coming out my nose.

  10. Not Allowed by parodyca · · Score: 2, Funny

    There can't ever be another Einstein. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem holds the trademark and they'd never allow it.

  11. Re:General improvement? by Quirk · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...so many are at the level of Heifitz.

    Not that I, by any stretch of imagination or schooling have the right to comment, but, I will.

    No, there aren't many who are at the level of Heifitz.

    As an aside, your post and profession provide me with an opportunity to ask if you know whether an anecdote I've heard is apocryphal. I was told Fritz Kreisler loved the night life and hated to practise. On occasion he shared the stage with Sergei Rachmaninov who would request Kreisler put in some audition time only to be brushed off. During a joint performance Kreisler lost his place and while improvising leaned into Rachmaninov and asked: "Sergi, where are we?". Rachmaninov was said to have tersely replied: "Carnegie Hall ."

    True, or apocryphal? Do you know?

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  12. Einstein was the frst slashdotter! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is not to say that Einstein wasn't insightful

    At first, he was a troll.
    Then he became interesting.
    But he was very underrated.
    His theories were all flamebait.
    But he was very informative.
    And insightful.
    Once in a while, funny.
    And now he's getting overrated?

    Wow!

  13. Re:wrong.... by irm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because that 4th dimension give you the time to take that square peg over to the belt sander and trim her down.

  14. Re:This is pretty obvious by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is not to say that Einstein wasn't insightful. He certainly was.

    I agree.

    MOD EINSTEIN UP!!!

    Re: Relativity (Score:5, Insightful)
    by Einstein (0) <speedoflight@gmail.com> on Tue Sept 18, 1905 12:42 PM

        E = mc^2

        Suck it.

    --

        God does not play dice with the universe.
    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  15. Re:Things have changed by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Funny


    When I was slogging through my 250 page PhD dissertation, I came across an article about disserations of such famous people as Schroedinger and other physicists of the 1920's - whose entire dissertations were about as long as Section 1.1 of my introduction.

    Don't make excuses for yourself: Schroedinger's dissertation was of infinite length until observed.

    ~Will

    --
    sig?
  16. Re:Uh? by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Funny


    While Hawking is well-known (he'd probably be less famous if he wasn't in a wheelchair)

    The wheelchair and speaking device is the tradeoff for sacrificing all that DEX and CHA for the high INT.

    --
    sig?
  17. Re:Personality, not brains by Dmala · · Score: 2, Funny

    The difference being that Han shot first, Einstein wouldn't have.

  18. Re:This is pretty obvious by C0llegeSTUDent · · Score: 2, Funny

    That would be World War .5 beta

    Next time use wikipedia, or else you will make a fool of yourself.

  19. Re:Personality, not brains by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is the true gist of timecube:
    "You maybe academically retarded.

    Academia Retards By Fact Earth Has 1 Day When Dead Still, And 4 Days Within 1 Earth Rotation, losing 3 days retards humanity.

    Are you stupid and evil?"
    Truly, a visionary.
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  20. Re:Deep vs Narrow by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anything they looked at represented a new area of science much the way that any explorer who sailed from Europe a thousand years ago would have been able to claim a new territory. It's much harder now; I've tried!

    I am not sure if that is a story we want to hear or want to avoid. Did you by chance try to be Nepolean also? :-)

  21. Re:Personality, not brains by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Funny

    An example of Einstein explaining technical matters to the layperson (paraphrased from memory):

    Reporter : Mr Einstein, can you explain to us how the wireless works ?
    Einstein : Well, you know the telegraph, it's like a very long cat, it has its tail in New York and its head in Los Angeles. You pull the tail and the head mews.
    Reporter : Uh, yes...
    Einstein : You see, the wireless works the same except there is no cat.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  22. Re:Personality, not brains by I_M_Noman · · Score: 2, Funny
    Gauss, together with Lobachevsky and Boylai, was the first to realise that there are other types of geometry than the Euclidian.
    And ever since I meet this man
    My life is not the same
    And Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name, hey!
    Nicolai Ivanovich Lobache-
    I am never forget the day I am given first original paper to write. It was on analytic and algebraic topology of locally Euclidean metrization of infinitely differentiable Riemannian manifold. Bozhe moi! This I know from nothing. What I'm going to do? But I think of great Lobachevsky and get idea - ahah!

    (Well, you know the rest.)

  23. Re:Personality, not brains by saider · · Score: 2, Funny


    Schrodinger would have both shot and not shot. However it would collapse into one of the outcomes once you watch the movie.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.