Slashdot Mirror


1" Hard Drives in Cellphones on the Rise

Tomo Hiratsuka writes "The imminent 10Gb 1-inch hard drives we've been hearing about have been well covered but the maker, Cornice, reckons its product could end up in over 70 million cellphones by 2009. Kevin Magenis, one of the company founders, isn't shy about pointing out that this is 30 million units more than predicted DAP sales."

10 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. whats the fascination with stuff that breaks? by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do not want a harddrive in my phone. My phone gets more abuse than any other gadget I have. Granted its cheaper than using flash but hell I would rather pay for something that isn't going to possibly be toast when it bounces once off the pavement.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  2. Hurrah for competition by hattig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is what competition (in this instance, between flash memory and tiny hard drives) is all about - better products for less money.

    $18.50 a gigabyte is pretty nice for such a small device. Flash isn't near that currently, but probably will be in 6 to 12 months time. Of course flash pushers will come up with other advantages for their side I'm sure ...

    What's more interesting is that these drives are so thin - under 4mm thick! That's kinda sexy. Would I want it in a battered cell phone? Dunno. Do I need 10GB in a phone even? I'd prefer it in a digital camera, or tiny media player. It'll be a 'hit' in the integrated phone/media player market I'm sure. Somehow these devices take the worst aspect of every platform they try to integrate and reproduce it - but one day they'll get it right.

  3. "... by 2009..." by Slartibartfast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Huh? Why, in the world, have a 10 GB HD, when -- by 2009 -- you'll be able to have (for a slightly higher premium) 8 GB of flash? Lessee:

    Flash uses less energy
    Doesn't need to spin up
    Won't "crash" [flash can have its own problems, but the heads ain't one of 'em]
    Can be easily extracted and plugged into external devices
    Etc.

    I love hard drives, but the super-duper-really-small stuff has never (and, IMHO, will never) catch on; flash has that pretty much sewn up.

    1. Re:"... by 2009..." by sstidman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because by 2009 the HD capacity will be 100 GBs and cost less than your 8 GB flash card. And by that time we'll all be bitching about the uselessness of 8 GBs of storage. Batteries will likely have significantly higher capacity by then so we won't care as much, the hard drives will surely have some energy saving optimizations and the hard drives will surely be every bit as pluggable as compact flash. And if the phone/PDA/MP3 player has a GB or 2 of memory built-in (which it surely will by then), the device could spin up the drive, copy off the next few songs/videos from the disk, and then spin down the disk drive, saving tons of energy.

      Remember when your PC had a whole gigabyte hard drive? Remember wondering how you could ever fill that massive beast? Okay, I'm old.

      --
      Send/track messages to 100K people: www.xPressAlert.com
  4. Not to mention battery life by scsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My clunky old Nokia 6310 lasted 2 weeks without a recharge, but my new super-fantabulous 6230i with colour screen, mp3 playback and movie capture barely lasts four days - without even using any of that crap!

    What's a hard drive going to do to already crappy battery performance? Bring us back to the 90's routine of charging every single night?

  5. battery life by stud9920 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    moving parts is just what my anemic battery needs.

  6. Re:Who would need this? by dcsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Who has that many friends that they need a 10GB hard drive to store all their phone numbers?

    Yeah, becasue no one wants to use their phone for anything except making and receiving phone calls. Except taking photos. And surfing the internet. An sending e-mail. And, these days, watching streaming video. Besides that, nothing at all. Except for rest of the stuff I missed.

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  7. Re:define: DAP by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps a SlashDot Glossary would be a good idea?

    Perhaps Slashdot editors could do what every professional editor on the planet does, and define what an acronym means the first time it's referenced in every article.

    This is common sense. I will grant, due to Slashdot's subject matter there are some acronyms that are common enough that they don't need to be defined (GNU, MS, RIAA) but if, as you suggest, this is the first time the term 'DAP' has appeared in a Slashdot story summary, the reader is owed a definition.

  8. Re:define: DAP by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps Slashdot editors could do what every professional editor on the planet does, and define what an acronym means the first time it's referenced in every article.

    That would be nice, but you always have the option to, you know, RTFA.

    Slashdot covers many esoteric subjects, so it's not likely that you will know every acronym or the name of every obscure language, technology, or application. Many times I have had to go into the threads to get more info about what the article was about, and many times I have learned interesting and very useful information that way.

    Just sayin'.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  9. Re:Sturdy? by DuBois · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.