Slashdot Mirror


Portable OpenOffice.org 2.01 Released

VeryVito writes "Portableapps.com has released Portable OpenOffice.org 2.01 -- the complete office suite you can run from a USB drive for complete access to both your files and your office apps -- anywhere you go. More than just a neat idea, some say it's a perfect example of "the kind of innovation developers can make when they don't have to worry about selling as many licenses of their work as possible." I don't imagine we'll see a portable Microsoft Office suite any time soon."

7 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Slashdot deal with Microsoft? by trezor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And some people are paranoid.

    Get some sense of proportion. It's a link. It's actually a link to a product you have to buy. And do you honestly believe that there still are people on this planet using computers that haven't heard about MS Office yet?

    Christ. Talk about overreaction.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  2. Portable Microsoft Office by putko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Microsoft runs an online service, then the browser (modified, perhaps) will be all that will be required to run Office on any computer (with internet connection).

    Any computer will have a browser (and connectivity), therefore MS Office will be omnipresent. You won't need to carry it around on a flash driver.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Portable Microsoft Office by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That presumes people are willing to run their business-critical apps on someone else's remote server. That looks good on paper every time someone proposes it, but Gmail is about the closest I've seen to it actually succeeding.

      I think it may be a while before someone edits CorpFinancialsAndCustomerList.doc at a rented terminal.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Portable Microsoft Office by gi-tux · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They could easily get business to buy into it, too, by saying that it makes the WebApp service more secure.


      And then when you read the fine print, you see that there is a clause that says that Microsoft now owns all rights to any data that is produced in this application. And for it to truly be portable, the data would have to be stored on their server as well, so how could you argue with the fine print after you discover it. Your document would simply disappear if you started to argue with them. Because they own the server, the application, and control the data.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
  3. Author AND reference by Wubby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, did anyone else notice that the author of this peice, VeryVito, uses himself as a reference. The "some say" link is to his own blog. Come on, if your going to plug yourself, be open about it!

    Oh, and the portable apps site seems to be 403. Slashdotted, maybe?

    --
    Sig
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
  4. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can see that your comment could be modded "funny", but "insightful"?

    For the mod who thought the comment was insightful: the comment should be translated as

    "This is exactly the kind of innovation developers can make when they don't mind if people copy their software."

    Please mod me "obvious".

  5. MS Office does not need to be portable.... by bpuli · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it is already on every PC out there.

    --
    BP http://www.card-central.com