Slashdot Mirror
On the Matter of Slashdot Story Selection
Let's talk about Beatles Beatles. For the uninitiated he's just some dude who submits a lot of stories. He actually happens to get a lot of them accepted. We have a number of users like this. Looking at the hall of fame shows you a number of the most successful ones. Now the motivation for getting a Slashdot story accepted (besides fame, glory and sexy women who start IMing you naked pictures of themselves mere seconds after a story goes live)is a return link to the website of your choosing. Your creds. Your 'Reward' for sharing a cool URL with a half a million Slashdot readers.
It's not hard to figure out what sorts of stories Slashdot likes. We have a format, and a subject matter. A persistent user can simply start spamming the bin with a submission about everything he finds that comes even close. If he does it enough, he'll get a few through. Especially if he manages to get something reasonable in at 11pm when there's little else to choose from.
Now there is no conspiracy. There is some Roland guy who's last name i can't spell who submits stuff all the time and people thought for awhile he was Timothy. Lately there is a Beatles Beatles user who conspiracy theorists now think is Scuttlemonkey. We don't know these people. They are not aliases for us. They aren't paying us. 3 months from now it will be somebody else.
Now these submitters each have their problems. In Roland's case, he likes to link to his personal blog where he writes mediocre summaries of stories that add nothing to the original. In BBs case, he just cuts and pastes paragraphs from linked pages. Both use their return link to link a web page which is, in my opinion, pretty worthless.
Now technically speaking, we could add a nofollow to their URLs. Or strip them entirely. But that puts me into the position of editing not just the submission, but the submittor, and i really don't think that this is "Right".
Part of the Slashdot Editor's job is to make a submission "Presentable". Usually this means moving a few URLs around. I'd guess a good half of story submissions use the word 'here' or 'article' or something equally stupid as their anchor text. I prefer relevant words to be linked. There are other minor things tho, like taking off extra intros like "Hi guys I read Slashdot every day and thought you would like this". We want the Slashdot story to be mostly distilled down to the essentials. Just the key 3-4 sentences.
Should part of this process be checking the URL of the submitter to make sure that it is legitimate? Does that really matter? Should we add a nofollow tag to those URLs?
My opinion is no. Those URLs are what you get for submitting a story to Slashdot. We selected it. The submission braved the Gauntlet. A hundred submissions died, and this one made the cut. I don't think it's fair that we strip creds from someone just because they choose to squander that URL on something stupid. Who am I to judge that after all?
Now the real problem with this is what it does to the discussion. Last night a nice story was posted. It came from one of our "Problem" users. And dozens of comments were posted about this user. The conspiracy theories. The hostility. Now a lot of this is normal Slashdot Forum Faire. Thats fine. But the problem is that often when this occurs, it swamps out the real discussion. The messenger becomes the story.
I think this sucks.
The story is not about Roland or Beatles Beatles or whatever other random user is submitting a lot of stuff this week. I encourage moderators to use their points to mod these discussions down when they see them. As a moderator, your job ought to be to steer the discussion on-topic. The submitter is almost never the topic!
The catch-22 kills me. I might have a URL in the bin worth sharing. Something a half a million of you might enjoy. But because a user with a "Reputation" submitted it, I know that posting it will spawn a giant forum cesspool. I could strip attribution and take away incentive for a user to submit. Or just throw away the article and forget it. Or I could post the story and watch as half of the discussion is simply about the submitter and not the URL that i wanted to share in the first place.
Damned if I do, damned if I don't, right? I'm seriously looking for feedback here. What should I do with a good submission from a reader with a reputation?
And moderators, use those offtopic mods to steer the discussion towards the subject of the article, not the flavor of the month conspiracy theory about story selection.
As a side note, I'm really going to try to write more articles addressing Slashdot matters on to Slashdot. But please understand that doing so is tremendously time consuming- this article will generate hundreds of pieces of mail and forum posts that I want to read and reply to. But there are only so many hours in the day. I would like to request that the forum try to stay on-topic here. Let's talk specifically about the issues i addressed above. We can talk about digg or moderation or whatever issues are of most interest next week.
Update a dozen or so users have made the same point: Simply wait for the same story to come from another user. If that was possible, I would do so. I'm really talking here about stories that are submitted just by one person. Part of why these users are successful is that they submit enough stories that they get a handful that only THEY submitted. I can't simply wait for someone else. That will never come!
update Allright it's been about 300 hours. I've read every comment posted so far, and replied to many. Even managed to whore myself a couple dozen upmods ;) I think we will add a nofollow to the submittor link. Several users raised good points and they ultimately convinced me that since the focus of the story is the submission, not the submittor, any link that detracts from the focus is less relevant. This will probably reduce some kinds of abuse in the future, but of course not all.
There's a lot of really good discussion in there. Some really good feedback. I haven't touched my inbox yet, but I see a lot of messages in there as well that I'll try to get to. I'll try to post again in another week or 2 on some other subject matter. If you have ideas on what that should be, you're welcome to email and suggest topics. We'll try to make it, if not regular, a frequent thing on Slashdot.
So you may be seriously surprised... but it's true. When someone submits 15 different URLs in 3 days, they are going to be the only submittor for 2 or 3 of them.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
You didn't read his whole post. He wants advice on how best you'd like it fixed.
-dave
http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
he is trying to fix it, he's asking for feedback
I would guess that most days a couple dozen stories are postable. We probably get 30-50 submissions to those stories that are usable.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
but i think that a user who gets a story posted to Slashdot should be allowed to link their vanity domain. Thats part of the fun!
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
our search system needs a lot of work. Our source code is available. If someone wants to help, that'd be swell. We have some dupe checking code. It works often. Of course it can never be perfect. We post a lot of stories about certain topics, some closely related. It gets messy fast.
And the no-follow thing seems awkward to me. It seems like i'm saying a URL is not worthy. Now sometimes that may be true, but where's the line? If i think your vanity domain name is ugly because I hate orange? Scammers? It's a spectrum of judgement that i'd prefer to simply ignore.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
Usually what that means is that the story was posted, but then disabled for some reason. Perhaps we found it was a dupe, or we found another, better URL later.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
I truthfully don't pay a lot of attention to the name of the submittor. I've deleted like 80 submissions this morning. I couldn't tell you the names of any of them. The only reason I "Care" who a submittor is, is that there are a few users who, if i post their story, I get hatemail from readers who angrily complain that I am obviously under their employ!
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
Speaking of Roland Piquepaille, he's not a part of ZDNet. Here's the story, with a creepy-ass picture where he looks like a cracked-out muppet.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
Let them keep the link but use nofollow. They'll still get the "cred" of it being there, it'll still drive people to visit their site out of interest but the search engines will ignore it and so those who try to post articles to boost their pagerank will be left out.
Everyone is a winner. Except the pagerank scammers, but we don't care about them.
I like this idea of Taco posting stuff about Slashdot every month. Next time I'd like to know how they handle dupes and what they intend on doing/implementing to reduce the number.
Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
That said, anybody who works for a company that wants a piece of hardware reviewed, just contact us. We'll review almost any gizmo or gadget. I don't think thats a paid advertisement- we just like to play with gadgets and talk about them. It's almost like that is a core part of Slashdot... talking about technology, hardware, gadgets etc.
This constantly frusterates me. Other sites do this, and we pay the price. We aren't paid for our story selection process. Never have been. But the accusations always exist. I know i should ignore it, but it still gets old.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
that system works fine with the top half dozen stories of the day. The one on ZD-Net AND CNN AND news.com AND msnbc.com. It doesn't work for anything more obscure.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
The other part is that feedback begets feedback. If i tell you why, you might disagree. That ends up in my inbox, and suddenly i have to spend 5 minutes writing an email explaining why. Again, suddenly my day gets a couple hours shorter.
Thats one thing that a lot of people just don't understand- when you're talking about ANYTHING regarding submissions, you have to multiply it by hundreds. Anything regarding comments, by thousands. And anything regarding page views, multiply by millions. Manpower and CPU are harder to deal with when you start dealing with those numbers, and we are limited on both.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
To summarize his response, he (and hopefully the other editors) does try to track down the original story, but will leave the meta-link in place if he feels it adds to the story in a significant way.
You may have already seen this, but I figure linking to it directly will cut down on the "OMG he's not actually reading the discussion" posts.
that that is is that that is not is not
I think we'll have that up soon.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/29/1
http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09
Surviving America
This is correct. ScuttleMonkey takes a lot of night shifts (US Eastern time). Those happen to be the slowest period for submissions appearing in our bin. And that's when B-B submits stories. So at exactly the time we need submissions most, B-B is there. Kinda clever actually.
Around 92% of the B-B submissions were sent in between 5 PM and 1 AM. And around 80% of the time ScuttleMonkey has posted a B-B story, it went live between 5 PM and 4 AM.
I didn't actually know this until your comment prompted me to check the DB, but that's pretty clearly what's going on.
Then submit the code that does it! We have something and it doesn't work well. We're not perfect here. We don't claim to be. But it's not "Just use a bayesian filter" I assure you ;)
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
Umm... Me too? To be honest, I have never clicked on a Referral link in my life. Didn't care enough to realize they were there. And Viola! so-called problem submitters never caused me the slightest grief.
There's a parable in there somewhere...
"I am become Gerund, Destroyer of Verbs"
#1 is a silly idea. A factory doesn't switch first and third shifts on alternate months ;) #2 is a bad idea too- while we often do post stories out for the evening hours ahead of schedule, someone still needs to be around to make sure things are cool. Fixing last minute typos, or to post a breaking piece of news that just happens as it happens.
Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
Are you able to spell from sounding it out?
Here's how it goes:
BAYS E IN
The catch is that the "bays" part is a guy's name, and it is spelt 'bayes', and the E IN part takes one of the three common ways to spell it: 'ian'. So you get "bayesian"
If you need a trick, here's one: pretend the guy's name is Ian Bayes. Then, spell it like "Bayes, Ian", except remove the capitalization, comma, and space.
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
It is already happening to Digg. It's becoming less usefull every day IMO.
Yes, there most definitely is and it is wonderful. So, if you are using the Greasemonkey Firefox plugin, download Slashdot Live comment Tree and greatly improve you /. browsing experience.
---
I am not a monkey