IP Attorney - Why SCO Has No Case
OSS_ilation writes "In an interview over at SearchOpenSource.com, IP attorney Thomas Carey shoots down SCO's cases against IBM and Novell, but predicts that SCO will fight a losing battle to its last. IT directors shouldn't worry about SCO Group's latest sallies in its legal war on Linux vendors IBM Corp. and Novell Inc., Clarey says, and explains why SCO has no case, predicts the open source legal fields of battle for 2006 and discusses SCO's claims against Novell. Carey chairs the Business Practice Group of Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, an intellectual property law practice in Boston, Mass." Groklaw, as always, has additional details and commentary on this.
hint for moderators: I'm not bashing the editors - I'm bashing SCO!
Godwin!
How do I get my $699 back?
__ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
IT directors shouldn't worry about SCO Group's latest sallies in its legal war on Linux vendors IBM Corp. and Novell Inc., Clarey says...
SCO is fighting this losing battle for what? Press coverage?
He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
What's their excuse this time?
Darl could call up HandelontheLaw.com - if you've ever heard his radio show the main point is for Bill Handel to tell you you have no case. He Loves That. Anyway, here's a joke from Bill Handel's web site:
In a recent FDA study, the United States government research physicians who were conducting studies on test drugs, administered weekly doses of Viagra to an equal number of doctors and lawyers.
While the majority of the doctors achieved enhanced sexual prowess, the lawyers simply grew taller.
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
...for successfully using "boondoggle" in a tech based forum. You scallawag! ;^)
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
Has anybody else noticed when you type in "slshdot.org" vise "slashdot.org" the first link is to scosupport.com?
Oh, now that's just too funny.
....
....
You are kidding, right?
O.K.; look at it this way: SCO eventually loses it's case, and the court tosses the firm to the lions, aka Novell, Red Hat, and IBM, who promptly reduce SCO to a smoking hole in the ground.
Said licensees come shuffling up to previously described smoking hole and whine "I want my money back."
Think they'll get a response?
}XD
Regards;
"I've been told we're going to sue NEC. Who are NEC?"
Me: "A large Japanese computer manufacturer. Why?"
"Apparently our new system doesn't work."
Me: "That sounds like software. NEC make hardware. Doesn't the hardware work?"
"Apparently the software supplier went bust, so we're suing NEC"
Me: "That doesn't make sense."
"The thing is, have they got a lot of money?"
Me: "I imagine they have huge amounts of money."
"Oh good, that'll keep us busy for a while then."
The reaction of lawyers everywhere.
Pining for the fjords