Analysts Predict Dell to Use AMD
An anonymous reader writes "CNet reports on an analyst's prediction that Dell will begin using AMD chips, instead of their much-touted Intel processors." From the article: "Dell likely will reverse course and begin selling computers with Advanced Micro Devices' processors, Piper Jaffray analyst Les Santiago predicted Tuesday, sending the chipmaker's stock up 4 percent in midday trading."
Dell has become a poster child for crappy customer service. Do AMD fans want Dell dragging AMD's good name down with them? I'd prefer that Dell self-destruct on their own without pulling AMD into their vortex of suckage.
- Greg
Start a happiness pandemic
Bush will decleare atheism.
Paris Hilton will stop being famous.
Microsoft will produce quality software
Linus Torvalds will soon to begin working at SCO.
It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
Be yourself no matter what they say
Once or twice per year, Dell themselves hint that they *might* start using AMD chips. I think they do this just to get good pricing from Intel.
In addition to Intel processors, not instead of them.
Intel based mac.
AMD based dell.
IBM based Xbox.
Whats next? ASP.net based Slashdhot?
Hell is truly freezing...
Â_Â
So if an Analyst says it, it must be true? C'mon, anybody can state an opinion that Dell will go with AMD, or it won't, but where's the proof?
Dell will begin selling computers with AMD processors in them when it makes good business sense to do so, i.e. will make them more money. I wonder sometimes if AMD's lead over Intel over the past couple years has had any effect on Dell, considering the brand awareness of Intel, very cheap low-end computers by Dell, and inherent conservative-ness of major corporations (read: customers).
Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
It'll be fun to see the new wars brewing between the big PC players - Dell & Intel using Linux against Microsoft. Dell & AMD using AMD against Intel. t. Microsoft using IBM (Xbox) against Intel. Intel&Apple using MacOS against Microsoft. The computing industry's starting to get fun again.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
They'd have to because cache is their remedy for FSB memory latency issues. AMD has the better answer with the integrated memory controller.
Your integrated memory controller reduces DRAM latency, but it is NOT the answer to smaller caches!
And it isn't entirely clear that on-chip memory controllers are the way to go. For one thing, a northbridge allows the pin bandwidth to be used for both DRAM accesses and inter-chip sharing communication.
But Intel probably hasn't switched to on-chip memory controllers because of the uncertainty in DRAM markets and standards. Intel's volume is huge compared to AMD and by integrated an on-chip controller for a particular interface, they are placing a lot of eggs in one basket.
That's not Intel's problem. AMD has a better design with a low latency integrated memory controller that Intel's bus system can't match. And Intel keeps pushing out the roadmap for when their chips will match this rather crucial design feature.
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."