Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Taking Longer to Fix Flaws

An anonymous reader writes "A look back at the last three years of security patches from Microsoft shows Redmond is taking at least 25 percent longer to issue patches for "critical" vulnerabilities, now averaging around 135 days to issue a fix. The exception appears to be with "full disclosure" flaws, for which Redmond issued fixes in an average of 46 days last year."

6 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. in other news... by tont0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    a bear shits in the woods.

    1. Re:in other news... by Foofoobar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Steve Ballmer throws a chair

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:in other news... by trandism · · Score: 3, Funny

      bug fixers. Bug Fixers!. Bug Fixers!!!. BUG FIXERS!!!!!!

      --
      www.lemonodor.com A mostly Lisp weblog
  2. No the flaw is in the user by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny
    No the flaw is in the user. Old saying, "Fool me once shame on your, fool me twice shame on me".

    Or to paraphrase, "sell me a bug ridden OS once shame on you, sell me a bug ridden OS twice shame on me".

    Cue everyone giving lousy examples of why they cannot live without windows.

    Proposal for a new moderation system, you can only mod people in OS discussions who are on the same OS as you.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  3. Delayed Ratification by digitaldc · · Score: 1, Funny

    Redmond is taking at least 25 percent longer to issue patches for "critical" vulnerabilities, now averaging around 135 days to issue a fix.

    It wasn't necessarily because it actually took longer for them to fix these new vulnerabilities, rather, their marketing department just wanted you realize the immediate benefits of installing Microsoft Anti-Spyware beta.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  4. This is perfectly reasonable. by Dorsai65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, when you consider how long it takes them to put the flaws in their products in the first place, it's only reasonable that it would take them longer to get the flaws back out again, right?

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...