Slashdot Mirror


U of Michigan creates first Quantum Microchip

zigziggityzoo writes "According to this article, The University of Michigan has created the first Quantum Microchip, which could eventually lead to the first instance of Quantum Computing ever." The bad news? We won't be seeing any notebooks or handhelds with quantum chips in the near future.

6 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. The Bad News by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bad news? We won't be seeing any notebooks or handhelds with quantum chips in the near future.

    Yeah, right. Let me introduce myself, my name is Richard and I am Vice Peon, Assistant to the High Junior Acolyte In Charge of Dustbins of the Holy Order of 8th Day Advanced Micro Devicers. Once we were few in numbers, our faith challenged at every turn by the Church of Intel. Scoffed at, most cruelly as rank copyists without an innovation to our name. After years of wandering the wilderness between iterations our faith was rewarded most gloriously! Speak not of Quantum Notbooks and Handhelds being a thing of dreams, for we know the mighty AMD will deliver.

    You'll see, you just watch! Ya betcha! Wrist devices, wearable quantum rings. Any second now. Yeah...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. What would Neil say? by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's one small chip for man, one Quantum leap for mankind.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  3. There might be a small problem by suitepotato · · Score: 5, Funny

    as you might be able to know where the computer is but not what it is doing or what it is doing but not where it is at the same time...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:There might be a small problem by skiddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think I have a quantum girlfriend :(

  4. Quantum Pairs by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect this story to be dupped again. This time, it will be the fault of their new CPU, not Slashdot.

    Finally, a dupe excuse for Slashdot!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  5. Re:Here's a Question for you: by centie · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is that there are only a very limited number of quantum algorithms which give a significant increase in performance over classical computing. Infact, there's only really two main classes; those based on Shors quantum fourier transform and those based on Grovers quantum search. So the possibility for exponential (Shor) or quadratic (Grover) performance gains, at the moment, is only available for a very limited number of problems. Not to say that in the future someone wont develope an algorithm which allows doom to be run faster, just at the moment its not known.

    For the first replier, qubits do NOT have three states of 1, 0 and 1&0. They are a superposition of 1 and 0. Think of it like a globe with 1 at the north pole and 0 at the south, the value of the qubit can be any point on the surface of the globe. This gives an infinte number of values, not just 3.