Slashdot Mirror


Mathematics Skills More in Demand Than Ever

knownsense writes "Business week has a nice article (feel good, low on detail, vague numbers) on the rise of maths and mathematicians in a world that is increasingly obsessed with statistics, advertising, search engines, and algorithms. The article also deals with issues of privacy. How has mathematics, statistics and other number driven aspects of life impacted you in the last decade?"

3 of 590 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The Pure Profession by RalphLeon · · Score: 3, Informative
    there are statements in math that we know we can neither prove nor disprove

    There called Axioms, and they are needed in all formal logic. If you really don't understand this concept visit:

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Axiom.html

  2. Re:Math vs Maths? by gihan_ripper · · Score: 4, Informative

    This may surprise those of you who assumed that the British contraction is older than the N. American one, but the opposite is in fact true.

    The first use of 'math' recorded in the Oxford English Dictionary is in 1849, whereas its earliest recorded entry for 'math' is in 1911, penned by the English War Poet Wilfred Owen

    1911 W. OWEN Let. 14 Sept. (1967) 81 The Answers to Maths. Ques. were given us all this morning.

    The well-known plural form 'mathematics' is to be compared with terms such as physics and metaphysics. In early use, the subjects were often referred to in the singular, as matamatik, fiskyke, and metaphesyk. In plural, they connoted something entirely different. For instance, physics was the title of Aristotle's collected physical treatises. 'Mathematics' would be used to denote the collection of the various branches of mathematics, such as geometry, algebra, etc. In modern usage, 'mathematic' and 'physic' have fallen by the wayside and the plural forms have taken their place.

    --
    Phoenix, Boston, Little Rock, see a pattern?
  3. Re:The Pure Profession by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're only partially right. Axioms are statements that (1) can't be proven, and (2) you assume are true, and everything is built upon them. However, there are other, non-axiomatic, statements in any formal system that cannot be proven either true or false. That's what the parent was talking about (hence the mention of the Godel's incompleteness theorem).
    BTW, if you're a CS major, you've encountered this in the form of the Halting Problem :)