Slashdot Mirror


Norway to Build Doomsday Seed Bank

Kagu writes "According to the BBC, Norway is planning to build a Seed Bank in the Artic Permafrost to protect all known variations of seeds in case of worldwide disaster." From the article: "Mr Hawtin said there were currently about 1,400 seed banks around the world, but a large number of these were located in countries that were either politically unstable or that faced threats from the natural environment."

59 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This article reminds me of a short story I once read by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. I think it's from his book Palm Sunday.

    Anyways, the world is dying because the resources were squandered by humans. As a last resort, we package our genetic material into the nose cone of a rocket and fire it blindly into space (colder than the artic tundra).

    Would it be such a bad idea to launch seeds into outer space to orbit the world just in case? I mean, they have to be worth something to us, right?

    From the article:
    Permafrost will keep the vault below freezing point and the seeds will further be protected by metre-thick walls of reinforced concrete, two airlocks and high security blast-proof doors.
    I hope there's a foot of lead included in that shielding somewhere. To me that would seem the most vital shielding they could provide.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The nice thing about having them on the ground is that you can get at them easily, even if civilization collapses. Which is pretty likely if all the crops die and there's no more food.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by 7macaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, seeds in the orbit will really help if we regress to the stage we don't even have any more seeds to plant!

    3. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AFAIK seeds don't last forever, which is why seed banks periodically replant and harvest seeds. I remember this coming up with some marijuana seeds (no joke) at some conservatory in Russia or something. Might be a good thing to search for on smokedot, if it wasn't using slashcode with its attendant super-shit search tool.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would it be such a bad idea to launch seeds into outer space to orbit the world just in case?

            Cosmic radiation can play havoc with DNA over time. You'd have to shield that thing pretty good (read a lot of increased mass). Not to mention this stuff must weigh a heck of a lot if you include a sample of ALL life forms plus the containers (petri dishes, test tubes, whatever). Added to the fact that the most likely outcome that this "ark" is likely to be vaporized by the first asteroid/moon/planet it happens to collide with makes it an unlikely "safe" place.

            The smartest thing we can hope to do probably is map out the DNA for every endangered species, in the hope that one day we will be advanced enough to synthesize this DNA again "de novo" in a lab and bring the species "back" if we ever need it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny
      This article reminds me of a short story I once read by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. I think it's from his book Palm Sunday.

      Yes, I read that one in (I think) the second Dangerous Visions collection. I wonder what he was driving at with the obvious dig at Arthur Clarke?

      I hope there's a foot of lead included in that shielding somewhere. To me that would seem the most vital shielding they could provide.

      I think they should build huge space ships with clusters of geodesic domes attached to them with artificial gravity pointing inwards and send it into orbit around Saturn. One member of the crew should be a homicidal environmentalist maniac with a talent for programming with a soldering iron. There should also be a crew of robots who are actually more intelligent and better trained than the human crew, which, now that I mention it, invalidates most of the above ideas, but any way.....

    6. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by temojen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or if you just need a few varieties because some local variety of a plant went extict due to local conditions, like the spill into the Harbin river. (not saying I know of a plant that went extict due to this... just some might have).

    7. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by temojen · · Score: 2, Informative

      D'oh! Songhua river, not Harbin (city it runs through)

    8. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by ugmoe · · Score: 5, Funny
      Permafrost will keep the vault below freezing point and the seeds will further be protected by metre-thick walls of reinforced concrete, two airlocks and high security blast- proof doors.

      Sounds like a challenge!

      I'm forming a high skills mercenary team to go in and get those seeds.

      I'll need an Olympic level biathlete , a demolitions expert, a Harrier pilot, a (preferably beautiful) horticulturist, an eskimo, a fence, and possibly an astronaut and/or a Mason.

      Equal Opportunity Employer

    9. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hidden vault... hopefully Geraldo will be around to find and open it for us ;-)... You may need to be an old fart to get this.

    10. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by cralewyth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Metre-thick walls of reinforced concrete, airlocks and high security blast-proof doors? What, are they trying to stop the seeds escaping? They only put high-security prisoners behind that kind of protection...

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    11. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyways, the world is dying because the resources were squandered by humans.

      I can't claim to be an expert on this, but I was actually thinking that such a seed bank could be quite relevant in a potential disaster that's probably less obvious than simply squandering resources. In particular, a large amount of food production, especially in the developed world (I don't know about other places), is essentially dictated by a small number of massive corporations which are very specific about what crops they'll grow.

      A good example is with potatoes -- there are about 200 different varieties of potato, but my understanding is that only four or five of them are seriously grown on a large scale in the US. Some of the former varieties are probably extinct by now, or close to it, simply because their original habitats have been wiped out and nobody grows them. Everyone's growing the same thing, everyone's eating the same thing, and there's very little variety.

      Someone can correct me on this if they know otherwise. My point is, though, that the lack of variety that's generally encouraged when a small number of corporations control it, makes it much more lokely that a disease or other biological threat could just wipe the whole lot out.

      Keeping a seed bank would be one way to make sure that the older varieties remain available if it ever becomes very important to retrieve them in the future. Reading the article, it seems that this is probably the sort of thing they're thinking about.

    12. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by peculiarmethod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but robots don't have passion...

      I should kill you for saying that, but my programming won't let me.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    13. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by Anthracene · · Score: 5, Informative

      The smartest thing we can hope to do probably is map out the DNA for every endangered species, in the hope that one day we will be advanced enough to synthesize this DNA again "de novo" in a lab and bring the species "back" if we ever need it.

      This probably wouldn't be enough. Although in a sense an organism's DNA has all the information needed to construct the organism, the DNA sequence is just a string of data. Construction of the organism requires (very, very complex) interaction between this data string and a "reader" (the cell). While the fundamental code of the DNA (translation to proteins) is fairly consistent across most organisms, the regulatory mechanisms (among other things) which are essential for life vary pretty widely. If you had cells from a closely related organism, you might be able to make it work, but then if you had a closely related organism, it probably wouldn't be so important in the first place.

      An (admittedly poor) analogy: If you had a single jpeg file and no knowledge of the jpeg format, how easy would it be to recreate the original image?

      Anyway, my point is that it's important to keep in mind that there may be as much information content in the "reader" as in the the "data", even when the data has enough information for the "reader" to construct duplicate "readers".

    14. Re:Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Short Story by Mythrix · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You're also completely forgetting about Mitochondrial DNA.

      When did jedis enter this discussion?
  2. Are they hiring? by ioudas · · Score: 3, Funny

    So where can i deposit my seed?

    --
    http://www.cushingproductions.com
  3. I already sent my donation in the mail! by Quaoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Oh wait, that kind of seed. I better lay low for a while...

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  4. politically unstable? by AxemRed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would a politically unstable country have a seed bank? I can't imagine caring much about how oak trees fare if my government was on the brink of collapse...

    //I'm also kind of curious what countries they consider to be "politically unstable."

    1. Re:politically unstable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say that Taiwan is an example of a place that is technological enough and like-minded enough to have a sort of seed bank, and yet it would still be considered politically unstable because of China's threats to invade. I doubt the people in Taiwan think their government is on the brink of collapse however.

      unstable != brink of collapse

    2. Re:politically unstable? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Congratulations!

      I do believe that is the most off-topic attempt I've ever seen to redirect an otherwise useful discussion into a religious flamefest.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:politically unstable? by Castar · · Score: 4, Funny

      To Norway, every other country is politically unstable ;-)

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    4. Re:politically unstable? by Rune+Berge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All Norway has is lutefisk, which would probably tend to repel invaders.

      That, and some oil. But, of course, nobody has ever invaded anybody over something as trivial as oil.

    5. Re:politically unstable? by harmlessdrudge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you Googled Jeff Hawtin, referred to in the story, you'd find he'd worked for the International Plant Genetic resources Institute which is part of the CGIAR, the consultative group on international agricultural research. Check here http://www.cgiar.org/centers/index.html/ a map of the world with the research centers of the CGIAR on it. Take a look. The CGIAR holds the gene banks of the world's major food crops in trust for humanity under UN auspices. You'll find potatos in Peru, rice in the Philippines, wheat and maize in Mexico etc. There are good biogeographic reasons why the institutes are where they are. One CGIAR institute, WARDA, the West African Rice Development Association, has had to move 3 times because of civil unrest, from Liberia to the Ivory Coast two years ago, from there to Nigeria (temporarily), from there, recently, to Benin. The Philippines has had several coups and attempted coups. Other countries where CGIAR institues and gene banks are located include Colombia and Nigeria.

      Your taxes help support the CGIAR and the sustain the gene banks of the world's most important food crops to the tune of $500m a year. It would be a shame if the billions invested were to be lost. About half of the world's population eats rice; 2 in 3 in Asia get most of their calories from rice. Half of the rice grown today was bred using materials from the rice gene bank of the International Rice Research Institute. If the gene bank of a major food crop was lost the loss to humanity would be incalculable, and the potential future consequences could include widespread famine, political unrest, large scale human migration and environmental destruction. For an insight into the economic importance of the CGIAR see the article on wheat in the recent issue of the Economist (Story of Man on the cover, or click here http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm? story_id=5323362&no_na_tran=1/). Norman Borlaug, featured in that article, works at the CGIAR's wheat and maize institute, still, in his 90s.

      As a recent profile of Gurdev Khush, a rice scientist, put it: his name may not have passed your lips but his work certainly has.

      The CGIAR doesn't have any gene banks for oak trees, though it does have two forestry institutes. Oak is a temperate climate tree found in Northern latitudes not known for political instability. The future of the world's climate, the security of its food supply, biodiversity and any prospects of world peace are largely in the hands of the world's poor living in developing countries. People who don't have enough to eat today don't worry about tomorrow. Lucky for us all the Norwegians are enlightened people. Likewise other supporters of Global Crop Diversity Trust.

      Two minutes here is all you'll need to understand why it matters http://www.croptrust.org/items/homepage.php/.

  5. Re:old news... it was alredy on digg.com by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... it was alredy on digg.com

    That's old news.

    KFG

  6. Hopefully... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    ... they have some good pot seeds frozen. Why should post-apocalyptic pizza stores go bankrupt?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  7. The stocks are going to have to be maintained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of seeds die if they are ever frozen, and no seed has an infinite shelf life. After a geologicially short time all the DNA of the seeds will break down. So unfortunatly this isn't going to do any good if we humans kill our planet.

  8. Umm... you mean 'temp-frost'? by hooeezit · · Score: 5, Informative

    As far as I know, the arctic permafrost is already melting - which implies that the seeds will not remain frozen for very long.
    And I'd suppose there would be flooding issues involved where there is a lot of melting water. So, they will probably succeed in creating an underwater chamber of moldy grains then?

  9. Further details on the Doomsday Vault by Xuri · · Score: 5, Informative

    More elaborate article on this can be found at NewScientist.com. Some sketches (2) over the vault available on the online Norwegian newspaper TV2 Nettavisen.

    Also, I'm a bit disappointed that BBC missed out on the whole "security-details provided by roaming polar bears"-thing.

    --
    -= Ho Eyo He Hum =-
  10. Also in the works is: by slashbob22 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Top Soil Storage -- Enough to dilute the nuclear fallout and to bury the bodies of the passed as well as provide sufficient nutrients for plant growth.
    2) Water Supply -- Unless whatever is causing the damage will filter water.
    3) Source of Light -- That volcanic ash could certainly block out needed sunlight.
    4) Parking Garage -- Fer yer John Deer and other machinery (unless the human toll was minimal - labour = food)
    5) Dummies Guide to Farming -- Tony Blair, George W, and all our favourite characters will get a spot in a safe location. To that I say, save the farmers.
    6) Apiary -- Most plants require Pollination.
    The above is by no means a complete list.

    Thank goodness we have the seeds. Now I don't mean to be extremely critical since in many cases it could be sufficient. However it would be prudent to consider other requirements for growth other then just the seeds.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  11. Re:Location, Location, Location by Ch_Omega · · Score: 3, Informative

    Permafrost =/= ice caps/glacier.[br][br] Permafrost is solid soil that stays frozen because of the climate. Even if the polar ice caps did melt, most permafrost exists at high altitude, and will stay frozen and unaffected if the polar ice caps melt.

  12. i saw that movie already, it's a bad idea by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    the thing

    sure putting all that genetic material in the frozen wastelands sounds like a good idea, but then you get mutant sled dogs wandering away from the destroyed frozen norwegian science outposts, and pretty soon kurt russell has to fire up the flamethrower and do some genetic mutant ass kicking

    sorry, this seed bank idea is bad news

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  13. Some of my heroes by Quirk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the site: The N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Plant Industry based in St Petersburg Russia, is the world's first seed bank and one of the world's largest collections of plant genetic material.

    Named after Nikolai I Vavilov, a Russian biologist, botanist and geneticist, the Institute's seed collections were largely built by Vavilov who scoured five continents in the 1920s and 1930s for wild and cultivated corn, potato tubers, grains, beans, fodder, fruits and vegetable seeds.

    Hitler's army blockaded Leningrad (now St Petersburg). Under German fire, scientists gathered unripened potato tubers from the Institute's experimental fields outside Leningrad. They burned everything they could find to keep the collection from freezing in the building.

    While guarding the collection, some scientists starved to death rather than eat the packets of rice, corn and other seeds in their desks.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Some of my heroes by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "While guarding the collection, some scientists starved to death rather than eat the packets of rice, corn and other seeds in their desks."

      If those were from strains that were no longer existent or hard to get, then you could call them heroes. If they were widly available, they were fools.

      OTOH, I would of ate them in any case.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Actually by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, In Soviet Russia, they build a Doomsday Device

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_device
    The Soviet Union built the world's only doomsday device, known originally as the "dead hand." The Russian dead hand is designed to launch the bulk of the country's nuclear forces in the event of a decapitating strike, utilizing specially designed rockets carrying radio equipment. The device may still exist under the name Perimetr.

    [Obligatory Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb quote]
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  15. Mmmm, global warming & permafrost by theolein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if they really thought this thing through or just got carried away in their zeal. The permafrost is melting worldwide. In 50 years there will not be much left in the arctic.

  16. Re:dirty! by revery · · Score: 2, Funny

    so....
    how'd you know it was the Gilmore Girls, huh?

    as for me... uhm... my uhm... wife wrote that comment

  17. Take that, Dolphins! by OverflowingBitBucket · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer to think of it as security of the species. Come on, hear me out...

    Picture this.... several hundred thousand years from now...

    A series of archaeologists from the now dominant evolved-from-Dolphins species that runs the planet finds a mysterious encased tomb. Cracking their way through the concrete covering, they find a collection of primitive seeds. Despite the training provided by their utopian society, enroute to the museum a couple of seeds manage to blow away and germinate in the soil nearby. Slowly but surely, plants from a long-forgotten era slowly grow and displace the native flora. Despite their best efforts, the native flora is rapidly killed off, being entirely unsuited to compete against these primitive plants. The rapid change in the flora leads to a collapse of the entire food chain, and subsequent extinction of the dolphin race.

    And then us monkeys get another crack at it! Take that Dolphin overlords!

    1. Re:Take that, Dolphins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But God created US in His image, not Dolphins. He gave us dominion over this world until Jesus returns. Let's not forget that. Jesus isn't coming back to a world with no people, or a world controlled by Dolphins. ;-)

      Worrying about seeds is rather pointless really. We need to be worrying about souls. This world is temporal, but eternity awaits everyone, it's a matter of where you spend it.

      Just my input, is it worth anything? Is it as valuable as everyone elses, or is my opinion less valuable because it's not popular? Let's see...

  18. Its a bit silly by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I dunno, this seems a bit silly all round. I mean if there is a catastrophe sufficient to wipe out all seed and food crops in the world, or at least within easy reach, it's not very likely that there will be a whole lot of anything or anybody else to replant and eat said food crops. On top of that, its fairly safe to assume the disaster would have pretty much erased whole ecosystems; are the food crops sufficient to maintain a viable ecosystem by themselves? Kind of a waste of money, really.

  19. Re:I would add... by grub · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Canada pot is pretty nearly legal. Small amounts get you a wee fine, no jail time or anything silly like in "free" countries. :)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  20. A much more interesting article... by nincehelser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg189253 43.700

    I think it's really more about preserving genetic diversity rather than being a hedge against world-wide disaster.

  21. Re:anyone else? by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but I did think of some sort of seed that, upon germination, would cause doomsday to occur.

    Sounds like something out of one of my weirder dreams...

    --
    "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  22. Another idea for preserving life on Earth . . . by Amiasian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Marshall T. Savage, a while ago, proposed a rather interesting idea for preserving life that I think would work as a great parallel project to this:

    In this boldly optimistic manifesto, Savage proclaims a master plan for the human race: to spread life throughout the galaxy. To many, space exploration seems irrelevant to Earth's real problems; but humanity may in fact have no other way to secure its long-term survival. To remain confined to Earth, Savage claims, is to court extinction, possibly within a few decades. Savage (an engineer who has established the Millennial Foundation to promote space exploration) outlines his program for transferring a significant portion of humanity off-planet. The crucial first step is to colonize the ocean surface with floating cities, quadrupling the living space available to the growing population of Earth. This allows us to reverse the degradation of the environment by shifting to the thermal energy of the deep ocean as our primary power source. At the same time, spirulina algae (already on sale in health food stores) becomes a major new food crop. The hardware for these oceanic colonies is already within practical reach: Savage provides a detailed inventory of how his floating cities would work and support themselves, with copious citations of the scientific literature. Once this move is well underway, it frees up energy and resources for the next steps. Improved space vehicles make possible orbiting space colonies, then settlements on the moon. A larger step is terraforming Mars--creating an atmosphere and a water supply for our lifeless neighbor to form a human habitat. On an even longer time scale, the race can expand into the rest of the solar system: asteroids and the moons of other planets. Ultimately, artificial habitats may completely surround the sun. With the resources of an entire solar system at our command, according to Savage, humanity can at last send out emissaries to other stars. The stuff of science fiction? Of course--but rigorously built from existing science, carefully documented, and convincingly argued. Highly recommended.

    1. Re:Another idea for preserving life on Earth . . . by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The crucial first step is to colonize the ocean surface with floating cities, quadrupling the living space available to the growing population of Earth. This allows us to reverse the degradation of the environment by shifting to the thermal energy of the deep ocean as our primary power source."

      Yeah, right. I was into that space colony stuff back when I was a teenager, which was around 25 years ago. The guy pushing these floating ocean cities needs to read John Brunner's "Stand on Zanziber" and then about a thousand books and articles written in the past 35 years.

      The problem isn't space--you can fit most of the world's population in a small area. The problem is resource distribution, which is compounded by things such as capitalism, imperialism, and all of those other modern evils. And if you treat your arable land like crap, then you'll have even less food to feed the population.

      How about we take care of what we already have instead of spinning poor suckers off to Waterworld colonies or tin cans in space?

  23. Re:Location, Location, Location by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fool. of course it's higher! North is up.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. Better to store the information virtually, maybe? by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you're right. Arguably it's a good idea, whether or not the organisms themselves are ever grown, because the DNA may have interesting genes in it that future biotechnologists might want to study and use, when we get to the point where we're able to not only "read" a genome easily but with full comprehension.

    It's for this reason that the actual viability of the seeds isn't maybe that much of an issue. So long as the DNA remains intact and can be sequenced, it will be useful.

    Although...I wonder if they might not be better off spending the money on sequencing the genomes now. That data can then be stored in many different places, and probably far more compactly and easily than the seeds. Furthermore, I think the mol bio field generally agrees that in the not too distant future it should be relatively straightforward to understand gene function from sequence, and that means only the sequence is really needed anyway. We won't need the actual DNA itself, because we can always reconstruct it, or the part of it we need.

    Basically I'm saying maybe preserve all these plant species virtually, in cyberspace, instead of actually, in the frozen tundra. Cheaper. As well as more cyberpunk.

  25. Re:thinking by Bananas · · Score: 2, Insightful
    50 comments and not a single one zeros in on the concept of a monoculture grain system being promoted by Monsanto (and friends) along with the potential effect it could have on grain stocks when (not if!) there comes to pass a blight or other form of crop failure.

    A simple challenge to you: if you're simply laughing at the prior sentence, then consider that you will die should it happen. If you're not laughing and you're seriously considering the effects, you too would consider a little biodiversity...

  26. Re:yeah but if by nfgaida · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If humanity manages to wipe itself out, are you sure we are worth trying to bring back?

    --
    *elevator music plays*
  27. Doomsday??? You insensitive clods! by TERdON · · Score: 4, Funny

    That should be ragnarok, nothing else.

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  28. Not silly at all. by Teun · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It does not need a complete collaps of the worlds life to make certian crops suddenly needing an infusion of clean genes.

    The past few years we've seen universities trying very hard to find old races/ strains of for example apple trees because the present ones seem to be more suspect to pests than it used to be.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Not silly at all. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2, Informative

      There have been a few times where diseases and plagues have almost removed almost all of a certain plant.

      Dutch Elm disease.

      Most all grape vines were destroyed by blight in Europe and actually come from vines in the United States.

      The SouthEast used to be covered with deciduous trees and not these ugly southern pines -- a lot more Black Walnut -- which is now pretty rare.

      Anywho -- this project makes a lot of sense. Some species could become extinct while we are preoccupied -- either with a large war or while trying to combat droughts and storms of a severe nature. I could see a lot of scenarios where we would have to deal with a lot of global emergencies and turn around and find we have no more of a certain species -- even a common one.

      I hope they do genetic samples, plasm, and embryos of many animals as well. Ideally they would just organize them by ecosystem -- grab everything from a specific area and preserve a small representative patch (freeze-dried and vacuum sealed).

      As well as lead lining -- add some graphite for good neutrino safety.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  29. life is life is dynamic! by aleator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    things change... that's the way of life! the only ecosystem that is at equlibrium is a climax. every other system is NOT at equilibrium and therefore living... generating new species and dying out on some other parts.

    if you save seeds, you did do a snapshot of available species at a certain time under certain conditions. sure plants can grow under a lot of conditions but don't rest on the fact that now we will have a global seed-bank in a stable cold place and now we can destruct the whole ecosystems of this planet just becasue we have the seeds to re-establish it back. this is NOT the case. plants are highly dependend on animals, bacteria, virii, ... they do not exist at their own. everything is linked. you cannot restore a whole such system by simply bringing back the plants. for a start: how would they fix nitrogen from atmosphere? this is done by bacteria in most cases that grow in plants.

    better let's keep the ecosystems we have now more or less stable and try not to destroy them completely than relating on seed-banks for conservation.

    don't get me wrong: seed-banks are very valuable tools for research and agriculture, but not for longterm conservation! ... want yet another illustrating example: imagine this: lets assume, we have put a dinosaur, a raptor, in cryo some milion years ago and now we decide to restore its population. we thaw it up again, make it mate with another dino of other sex and let them have children. now try to find a place in our modern world, where they would be able to reestablish a population... maybe a city like new york or tokyo? or london or paris or kolkata? 18milion humans and 150 raptor dinosaurs in same habitat... would this be possible? probably not. the time has passed and things changed. the raptor has no chance to exist in our world. this will be probably the most frequent fate of such imaginary experiments, because of the fact that life cannot be preserved but only prolonged and even that has its limits... ;-) ... think about that!

  30. I don't know about you, but by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Building a doomsday seed seems a bit risky.
    What happens if it gets lost? or a bird eats it then shits it onto an innoscent park some where.

    1 year and a little water...kabooom!
    just to risky...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. They should have seen it coming... by TechieHermit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Having not taken Murphy's Law seriously enough, the brave Norwegian seed guardians first notice Doom as a distant whistling noise.

    Say, Gunter, vot is zat zound? Asks Olaf.

    Vhy, I dunno! Says Gunter. It sounds almost like a vhistle!

    They ponder the problem for a few seconds, and look out the window of the seed bank guard tower where they were having lunch a minute earlier. Gunter speaks first.

    Olaf, there is a very strange circular shadow on the ground. It covers ze whole base!

    Yes, I see, Gunter, what can zis mean?

    Both men look up. The meteor Doom hangs over their heads for an instant, just like the big evil sphere in The Fifth Element, improbably rotating with a very slight cant, and then descends. Unfortunately there is no Wild Hottie available to save them... All the models are in New York for "Fashion Week". The meteor falls directly on them, squashing them all as flat as a day-old tostada.

    The resulting release of energy wipes out all the plants on Earth, and the survivors think, "yeah, we should have seen it coming... Doesn't it always happen that way?"

  32. Norway has political stake to develop Spitsbergen by bdwoolman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Svalbard, of which Spitsbergen is an island, is a complicated case politically -- sort of like the Antarctic where signatories to the treaty of Svalbard can have a research or economic presence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard.

    Norway's sovereignty is not in question, but it is under constraint. The Russians mine coal there (among other things). Norway has huge oil reserves in the North Sea and wants to move drilling into the Arctic ocean. The Norwegians have a strong interest in developing Svalbard and have a heavy presence in Longyearbyen. There is a developed tourist trade for people like me and my crazy wife who rode snowmobiles six hours to Berentsberg (The Russian Settlement) in a whiteout last Easter. But how many idiots like us can they count on?

    Now, put in this context, the seed project makes a lot more sense. It is a good thing to do, of course, but at root there is the matter of "presence" not to mention all that oil and gas up there. And let's not forget those pesky Russians who also have interests.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  33. Why the fuck is the parent moderated funny? by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The guy spent TWO FREAKING DECADES collecting that stuff. Folks guarding it realized it would only last them a few days, so chose not to destroy a valuable scientific artifact. This is HEROISM folks, in its purest form. Not "firefighter" flavor cultivated here in the US.

    Mod the parent Insightful.

  34. doomsday seeds? by idlake · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where can I get some? Mwahahaha.

  35. 1-up by tentimestwenty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you heard about the Microsoft Seed Bank?

  36. Humbug! by andersh · · Score: 2, Informative

    I certainly don't agree with your sentiments - Norway feels very much in control of Svalbard with the treaty in hand. The only other issue is of course the conflict with Russia and Iceland over fishing in the waters surrounding Svalbard. Now, establishing the seed bank on Svalbard would not change anything in that regard! Every major and minor nation party to the treaty including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom (including overseas dominions) and the United States, Russia and Germany recognize Norwegian sovereignty over these islands. It's the sea surrounding it and the territorial limits that we expanded that they don't fully agree with!