Slashdot Mirror


Newswire Misreports Gamer's Suicide

Asriel86 writes "Pulling from the AFP newswire, Yahoo, CNN, and others have been reporting about how a gamer broadcast his own suicide on a gaming forum via a webcam, and that members of the forum continued to ridicule the gamer while he killed himself. Gaming Horizon has just learned that this is completely untrue. The newswire reporter failed to check the facts, and in turn painted this simple gaming forum into cruel monsters. The forum (hosted at metalgearsolid.org) has been taken offline at the request of Government agencies following these news reports."

60 comments

  1. *sigh* by Kelson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems there is no tragedy that can't be made worse by sensationalist media trying to make the story fit their preconceived notions of what will get them ratings.

    (Not that reporters have a monopoly on this sort of thing. Self-serving politicians looking to make a name for themselves are entirely capable of it as well.)

    1. Re:*sigh* by flogic42 · · Score: 1

      The solution to this is to vote with your feet. Boycott news agencies that fabricate this kind of bullshit. Trust must be earned.

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    2. Re:*sigh* by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Except that all news agencies that are advertising supported need to sell in order to stay in business. In order to sell, they make up sensational stories. Then people get upset at them, but nothing ever changes. It's just the way it is. Get used to it and read everything with a grain of salt.

      Of course, with public news sources, they are either corrupt government propaganda machines or they don't need to work hard for their jobs, so they are lazy and publish incorrect information.

      (Yes, there are probably good journalists. However, whenever I read about something that I understand pretty well (e.g., technology reporting), there are always glaring technical errors. I can only assume the same errors exist in every type of reporting.)

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  2. Give AFP some feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article:

    "If you'd like to contact the AFP newswire about their story, you can do so via this form and selecting the "Contact news department" option for the first drop-down."

    1. Re:Give AFP some feedback by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1
      "If you'd like to contact the AFP newswire about their story, you can do so via this form and selecting the "Contact news department" option for the first drop-down."
      I'm going to commit suicide on their forum!
    2. Re:Give AFP some feedback by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 1
      I'm going to commit suicide on their forum!

      Mod + 1: Tasteless but amusing

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
  3. What? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

    The forum (hosted at metalgearsolid.org) has been taken offline at the request of Government agencies following these news reports."

    "Government agencies" can take down websites without even determining if a crime has taken place? Land of the free, hmm? I can see where this is going...

    "Hay guys, it's Bill again. I think that apple.com is actually a secret code for terrorists. You should close it for a few years until your investigation is done."

    1. Re:What? by faloi · · Score: 1

      "Government agencies" can take down websites without even determining if a crime has taken place? Land of the free, hmm? I can see where this is going...

      I think the forum was hosted in Bulgaria. I didn't realize they were a land of the free, too...

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:What? by esampson · · Score: 1
      According to the article all the unnamed agency did was request that the site be taken down. The article could have it wrong and the agency had a court order and they ordered the site to be taken down, but assuming that the wording is correct then certainly the agency has the authority to request something like that.


      "Hello, Mr. Jobs? We've got reports that Apple.com is a secret code for terrorists and we'd like to request you take the site down until our investigation is done."

      "I'm not sure what medications you've been taking but I would advise you try halving the dose."

    3. Re:What? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the forum was hosted in Bulgaria. I didn't realize they were a land of the free, too...

      And that would be a "fact" garnered from the same article that got all those other "facts" correct. A quote from the article linked in the news blurb above:

      The article also claims that the site was Bulgarian, which it isn't. The company that designed the website is based on Bulgaria, but it is hosted and maintained in the US.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course they have the authority to MAKE A REQUEST...
      because that is all it is, a request, not an order or a demand or a threat.

      they have the option of not honoring the request...

      just like if i get pulled over and the cop requests to search my car (without any probable cause), he requested, i can deny his request and be on my way

    5. Re:What? by techstar25 · · Score: 1

      The article did say the website is based (hosted?) in Bulgaria. Is that near Montana?

    6. Re:What? by ymgve · · Score: 1

      That was just another fact AFP got wrong. The site was designed in Bulgaria, but hosted in the US.

    7. Re:What? by Locke03 · · Score: 1

      Come on, we all know it but just usually don't admit it: This country (the United States) is not really "free", nor is the rest of the world (anarchy isn't really free either). There is just enough of an illusion of freedom to keep the populace fat and happy. We can see where it's going too, take more and more freedoms...but just a little at a time with "reasons" that sound good. Eventually someone, be it a person or governing body, will have their chance at a power grab and take it, then we can kiss even our illusions goodbye.

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
    8. Re:What? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A government agency *recommended* it be shut down and the owner of the site did so. Nowhere does it say the government agency forcibly shut the service down, or ran into their offices with attack dogs and shotguns or anything like that. There's nothing illegal about a government representative saying, "might be a good idea to shut this down" and the site owner doing it.

      I think you're being more than a little paranoid. Save the rant for when our rights *really are* in danger.

    9. Re:What? by samjam · · Score: 1

      if a "government agency" suggested you stay in your home for a few weeks, would you feel any better that your house arrest was merely a suggestion?

      Would you step outside? Would be be afraid.

      Sam

    10. Re:What? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      If my government "suggested" I stay inside with the intent of putting me under house arrest (as opposed to suggesting I stay inside during some kind of actual emergency) without the benefit of trial, of course I'd still step outside and, no, I wouldn't we be afraid. This is because I'm not worried that government agents are going to shoot me, beat me or imprison me if they're so unconcerned that they aren't bothering to initiate legal proceedings.

      When folks like you make comments like that, it confirms my opinion that fully subsidized psychiatric care should be priority number one when it comes to health care...

    11. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They "requested", they didn't "forcefully shut down". Go jump to conclusions elsewhere.

    12. Re:What? by samjam · · Score: 1

      And so... what if a government agency decided that you needed psychiatric care? It's so important, in fact the care of citizens health is more important that the temporary protection from terrorists - your government cares, you see!

      Sam

    13. Re:What? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      The site was designed in Bulgaria, but hosted in the US.

      And outsourced to India, who second-sourced it to Thailand. See, it's getting close to Bulgaria all the time!

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  4. sounds like a slam-dunk slander case to me by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sounds like a slam-dunk slander case to me, and considering how awful a thing the reporters did, I'd seriously consider taking them to court for it, considering it has caused damage already.

    I don't know how realistic that is though.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:sounds like a slam-dunk slander case to me by Parity · · Score: 1

      Not likely. They (the newsies) will print an (almost completely unpublicized) retraction that nobody will read, but it will cover them legally as having 'corrected' their 'mistake'. It sounds as though the interviewee - who might be culpable under U.S. law - must live in Bulgaria (as he's an employee of a Bulgarian web design studio). CNN, et. al., will say they were only reporting his words in 'good faith', and a gaming chat site will not have the resources to effectively sue CNN or Yahoo. Even with deep pockets to back the case, I wouldn't give it good odds.

      (Of course, I haven't read the original inaccurate articles - I don't want them to get any more hit count for it.)

      --
      --Parity
      'Card carrying' member of the EFF.
    2. Re:sounds like a slam-dunk slander case to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interviewee doesn't live in Bulgaria, in fact the forum has absolutely nothing to do with Bulgaria. The interviewee was an employee for the web hosting company (not a moderator) who lives in the US. He just happens to have a Bulgarian name. This is yet another example of the brilliant journalism in this piece.

    3. Re:sounds like a slam-dunk slander case to me by nacturation · · Score: 1

      The interviewee doesn't live in Bulgaria, in fact the forum has absolutely nothing to do with Bulgaria. The interviewee was an employee for the web hosting company (not a moderator) who lives in the US. He just happens to have a Bulgarian name.

      Wow, all-time low marks for reading comprehension all around. FTFA:

      "[update: We've just learned that Boyan Georgiev, the man quoted in the AFP story as a "forum administrator" doesn't even work for metalgearsolid.org; he is a web designer that works at the same design studio as the designer of metalgearsolid.org.]"

      Okay, so he's not an employee of the hosting company as you claim. Zero for one so far. But let's see if you figured out where he likely lives. So where's the design studio?

      "The company that designed the website is based on Bulgaria, but it is hosted and maintained in the US."

      Now if he works at the design studio and that design studio is based in Bulgaria there's a good chance that, unless he telecommutes (what an awful word, btw) or comes in from another country, he also lives in Bulgaria. Zero for two.

      This is yet another example of the brilliant journalism in this piece.

      Pot, meet kettle. At least you got it right that he's not a moderator.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. "hosted at metalgearsolid.org" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Well, of course they believed it - as everyone who's ever played Metal Gear Solid can tell you, playing it definately makes you want to kill yourself!

    "Please shut up, snake, and let me PLAY THE GAME again... Why, of why, can't you skip the codec sequences? I don't want to 'fast foward' through two talking heads, I want to skip it entirely - oh, wait, cutscene #3, skip, great, more codec. And another cutscene, and - more codec. Screw this! *BLAM*"

    When Metal Gear Solid is considered one of the best "all time games" for your console, you know it's time to find a new console.

    1. Re:"hosted at metalgearsolid.org" by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

      This has been a Max Payne news report.

  6. Nothing new by FrontalLobe · · Score: 0

    The media makes up crap all the time to spice stories up when they just aren't intesting enough/slow news day/whatever...

    For example, a buddy of mine had his bedroom go up in flames. They reported the fire on the news, where "One man was taken to the hospital to be treated for 3rd degree burns". Yes, he did get taken to the hospital. They put a band-aid on his finger.

    Can I see a raise of hands who believes everything they see in the news? Didn't think so.

    --
    -FL
    1. Re:Nothing new by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      But I believe everything posted by random people on Slashdot.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

  7. i told u i was hardcore by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    This may not be true, but the story is very similar to Brandon Vedas, who OD'd while on IRC. Google subject title for more information.

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    1. Re:i told u i was hardcore by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I think the reporter either borrowed elements of that story or got his facts mixed up between the two. The story read like a mix between this suicide and Brandons.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    2. Re:i told u i was hardcore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was also that guy on myspace that posted his suicide note as his last entry in his blog.

      then he got 1000's of goodbye/I miss you posts from his friends.

      I'm not convinced that it was real though. I think his username was 'jloveb'.

  8. Government takes metalgearsolid.org offline? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Informative
    The forum (hosted at metalgearsolid.org) has been taken offline at the request of Government agencies following these news reports."
    This appears to be true. The site is down and displays the message below. To me, the story here is how and why "Government agencies" (whoever that is) requested the site to be shut down. And the message appears to be from the ISP, not from metalgearsolid.org. Is this another ISP caving at the first request to shut a site down? Or is there something legitimate happening there? Shutting the site down, when there is nothing wrong with it, just adds to the sensationalism.

    Text below:

    This Account Has Been Suspended
    Please contact support as soon as possible. Your site could have been suspended for one or more of the following reasons.

            * Your site's paid service has expired. To check this, login to your control panel at bluehost.com. If your site is expired, it won't let you log in and will take you immediately to a renewal page.
            * Your site was sending out spam. Please note that many "safelists" are still considered spam. BlueHost.Com has a ZERO tolerance stance towards spam.
            * Your site was consuming too many resources. This happens on occassion to very busy sites that have inefficient scripts running.

    For information on restoring your account please call customer service toll free : (888) 401-4678
    Following is a link for our acceptable use and terms of service for bluehost.com : Terms of Service
    If you would like to reach our support online you may do so at the following link : Bluehost Support

    When/If you call our support help line, please have your site name ready.
    1. Re:Government takes metalgearsolid.org offline? by tprime · · Score: 1

      Was the site up before and just got crushed (and exceeded what the ISP allows in bandwidth) because every news site out there is linking to it?

      --
      http://www.tomandemily.com
  9. Chicken Little by jskline · · Score: 1

    Seems as though these *reporters*...; if thats really who they are, have apparently not ever read, much less heard of the story about "The Sky Is Falling"... et al.

    Typical monitarily biased media people...

    lol.

    Pretty soon it will be the crying wolf more than 3 times and no one will answer. Then there really will be trouble in paradise.

    Cheers
    Jeff

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    1. Re:Chicken Little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTA Jeff

  10. The real political leaning of the media by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love how everyone on the right rails about the media being a leftist propaganda wing, while the people on the left call it a mouthpiece for the Bush white house.

    Both are BS. The press leans whichever way will make it the most money.

    The media exists to make money. Simple as that. They provide a service people pay for, and they temper their reporting to get the most exposure. Ever hear of "if it bleeds it leads?"

    This is simply another example of the media 'sexing' up a story to get more attention and interest. I mean, which sounds more dramatic, "kid kills self, net friends try to talk him out of it", or "kid kills self, net fiends egg him on and watch his deathtrows on webcam."

    The press leans neither left nor right, they lean towards $$$

  11. From the form by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the form:By filling out and submitting this form you authorize AFP and its agents and/or representatives to contact you (via e-mail, phone, and/or mail) about its products and related services, including announcements of special promotions.

    spamspamspamspamspam!

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  12. From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On January 2 he posted a message in both forums detailing his intent to end his own life, citing overwhelming complications with school and finances. Damn, that's heartbreaking. I'm in awe of how badly the press screwed this up, yet touched by the response by his fellow gamers.

  13. What is the law on this anyway? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If a guy says he is going to kill himself by say jumping of a bridge, when do I turn from a bystander into a criminal?

    I know it is usually illegal to assit in a suicide. But what exactly is the law?

    Say a slashdot poster, lets call him "Emo_Kiddy", said he was thinking of ending his live. If I do nothing and just ignore him is that a crime? Do I have a duty to report this?

    What if I suggest a few handy links with sure fire tips of how to kill yourselve.

    Am I allowed to call him a pussy who is to weakwilled to do it anyway? Dare him?

    Call me a nasty heartless person but I seen to many teenagers who claim they are going to kill themselves and never do. So this kid actually had the balls to do it (or made a fatal misjudgement on getting attention). Does this force the rest of society to be at their constant beck and call everytime some emokid seeks attention?

    To bad for the kid that he saw no other way out but is that really the problem of the rest of the world?

    I am going to kill myself, if you have read this you are now obligated to stop me. Don't and slashdot will be shut down. Nice. Could put a whole new twist to trolling for ops in a forum/irc channel. 'give me ops' 'no' 'I am going to kill myself' 'Oh okay, your an op'.

    Oh well, time to visit sexylosers and see if there is a new suicide girl comic.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What is the law on this anyway? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I am going to kill myself, if you have read this you are now obligated to stop me.

      You don't have the guts, you pansy. =P

    2. Re:What is the law on this anyway? by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Just do it you weak-willed pussy.

  14. AFP by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    from TFA : "The story was picked up by AFP, "

    AFP i.e. French media. I wonder it was really horrible babel fish job.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  15. He was a member of our community... by Xerxus · · Score: 1

    Kuja was a contributing member member of LUELinks.net (completely private)

    His contributions are appreciated.

    There aren't many of us left. Carry on.

    *SaLUEtes*

  16. Shroomery.org guy? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like the AFP caught wind that someone who had internet access killed himself, then decided to combine the story with this report, from 2003, on the death of Brandon Vedas.

    Astoundingly bad journalism...stealing detail from an unrelated past event and implying that they happened again.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  17. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot.

  18. Stupid hidden comments. by Parity · · Score: 1

    It looks as if you're tearing into me except that you're quoting things I never said. Had to drop my threshold to see the real shape of the tree. You're absolutely right, of course, the AC is off his nut. I do wish there were some visible indication that there's a hidden layer in the response tree. (I know, I know... then it wouldn't be -hidden-.)

    --
    --Parity
    'Card carrying' member of the EFF.
  19. Can't judge unless we see the site. by Somatic · · Score: 1
    In reference to Brandon Vedas: I just read through that entire chat log. It is some very sad stuff.

    The majority of people in the chat room seemed to be trying to help him, but there was one punk that just kept daring him to eat more and more. Then they decided to call him. So which one calls him? The punk, of course. I'm sure that helped. It's the guy named Smoke2k in the chat log.

    Point is, we don't have the original site to look at. We only have heresay. But I'm inclined to believe the original article just because I know people and I know gamers. I've been in a lot of gaming communities, and we all know what they can be like. If you're enough of a gamer to be reading the gaming section of Slashdot, you know what I'm talking about.

    People making fun of him, and egging him on, is more believable to me than a community full of helpful folks. Until we see some proof either way, I'm going to have to believe the original articles, because they ring of truth to me, while this rebuttal doesn't.

    --
    My script don't crash! She crashes, you crashed her!
    1. Re:Can't judge unless we see the site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I might be inclined to believe you if I wasn't one of the guys who saw his last post.

      Metalgearsolid.org has a private board for "Regulars" - that is, people who visit the site extremely often and know all of the other regulars. This is where Mitch posted his suicide note. No one egged him on or made fun of him, and we all pleaded with him to stop, even talking to him on the phone and getting him to induce vomiting. It was too late though - the antifreeze had probably already fatally poisoned him at that point.

      MGS.org is telling the truth - these "journalists" are pigs.

    2. Re:Can't judge unless we see the site. by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of gamers you hang out with, but none of the places I hang out treat suicide or death as a joke. Even the lowest of pranksters will usually turn around when this sort of thing happens -- and believe me, NONE of them make fun of it when it DOES happen and it's been proven. I don't think ANY gamer (who maintains any sense of sanity) would laugh in the face of proof that a fellow gamer was killing himself, as the original article would have us believe.

  20. more info by webwench_72 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

  21. proper reaction? by leland242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Picture it - you're on a forum. Someone makes a post "i'm going to kill myself". Do you a) say no, b) say do it, or c, say nothing?

    I'd probably say nothing, assuming it was bullshit. If I was in a mood, I might provide a wikipedia link to suicide techniques or tell him to slash up, not across his wrist.

    Either way, would you honestly believe the posting and attempt to stop the person?

    1. Re:proper reaction? by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

      Depends on the person posting and the seriousness of the post. Not that you can really generalize well on suicides, as they are all a fairly unique case, but if someone who was a long-time member of a community isn't known for tasteless jokes, then you'd better believe I'd take it seriously! When people are ready to kill themselves, they often go to the places they feel most secure and 'say goodbye' -- Of course, these places are often internet forums or other outlets where the recipients can't interfere with their real life (or stop them from killing themselves).

    2. Re:proper reaction? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I've witnessed such things online a couple of times, in MUDs back in the day. In those instances there were people who did indeed believe the individual and say something to them, dropping everything they were doing to go into "crisis mode". There weren't necessarily pre-existing relationships between the Distressed and the Comforters either, just strangers who happened to be on the same game. I tried to help out with one once too, I didn't know him but he was being pretty unreasonable in his stated motivation so I took a run at pointing out the errors he'd be making in deciding to stop at this particular point. I don't know if it worked or not, because I didn't know him to begin with so didn't manage to remember his name later, to see if he was still around. I wasn't emotionally involved or anything, it had just seemed like "the right thing to do" to have spent a bit of time with him to at least add myself to the growing list of people trying to talk him out of it. Strength in numbers and all that. In the end, looking back, it didn't really matter to me. I suppose it's because Internet People that I haven't actually talked to before don't truly become "real" people to me until some time of association has passed.

      Why did I bother then? I'm not sure, and it has occasionally puzzled me how concerned previously-unknown inviduals become when someone talks about committing suicide. I've been in the uncomfortable predicament a few times, of wanting to end my life, to the point where I had done a great deal of research and was mentioning the idea in mixed company. It's just so weird when a complete stranger gets all into you suddenly about how you're needed and all that, because they don't even know what you contribute; and why should it matter if someone they wouldn't have missed continues to not be a part of their life? But it happens, I've seen it, I've been on both sides (talking real people down from it too occasionally, and those people, though also strangers, were of course "real" to me so there was definitely more concern on my part). I honestly still don't get it.

      Since we exhibit various biologically-driven species survival traits that we have little control over (like the fight or flight adrenaline reflex, or the urge to fuck every woman possible), maybe this reaction is one of those things. Maybe we're wired to want to make sure others of our species get to survive also, because it furthers the big picture, of the species as a whole continuing to grow and thrive. Wired to have reverence for life.

    3. Re:proper reaction? by Ckwop · · Score: 1

      It depends if the forum is Alt.Suicide.Holiday or not?

      Simon

  22. Standard Quality Reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This level of quality reporting is standard in ALL NEWS REPORTS.

    Take everything you read with a very very large grain of salt. Things are sensationalized and often blatently factually wrong. You really cant believe anything you see on the news these days. Its pretty sad.

    That being said, who knows what the hell is going on anywhere at any time. I dont really watch the news anymore, its just not worth it. Quality isnt up to par.

  23. About the big scary gov by Rabbitgod · · Score: 1

    The forum (hosted at metalgearsolid.org) has been taken offline at the request of Government agencies following these news reports. A few people have made comments about the site being shut down by the goverment. I would like to point out that you misunderstand. It was shut down by metalgearsolid.org at the request of goverment agencies. If metalgearsolid.org had refused their wouldn't be much the goverment could do. I'm not a big fan of alot of the people in goverment but if your gonna harp about the first amendment being volated you should ad lest make sure you fully understand whats going on. Other wise when it really does happen people will hear you and say that it is you who are cring wolf.

    1. Re:About the big scary gov by Rabbitgod · · Score: 1

      I would like to point out that I was also wrong it was shut down by the hosting co but still at the request, not order, of the gov.

    2. Re:About the big scary gov by JediLow · · Score: 1
      The site's back up... what they said is that the hosting company was notified that they were being investigated (due to the nature of what occurred... I'd think it was some form of police investigation) - in turn the host shut down the site because they figured the site was in the wrong no matter what.

      From their boards it looks like their host is now trying to get rid of the forums on the site altogether.

  24. Another history... by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    ...of a man who suicides and the press tell us that the game kills another person. It's obvious that the game is not the problem, I saw a lot of stories about gamers that died after 4 days of gaming (no pause for food or sleep).