Google Won't Pay Bell South
grandgator writes "Google has offered
a clear response to Bell
South's proposal to charge content providers an additional fee for access
to their network: They won't pay. In an email, Google's Barry Schnitt told the
folks at networkingpipeline:
'Google is not discussing sharing of the costs of broadband networks with
any carrier. We believe consumers are already paying to support broadband access
to the Internet through subscription fees and, as a result, consumers should have
the freedom to use this connection without limitations'"
I commend Google for standing up to the Dark Lord for us.
Free Beer!
The summary: Give us more money, and we won't throttle traffic to your site. In response, Google tells them to [results filtered by safe search].
Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
Agent Smith: "If I go to the airport, I can buy a coach standby ticket or a first-class ticket," Smith said. "In the shipping business, I can get two-day air or six-day ground."
Neoogle: Wow, that sounds like a really good deal, Bill. But I think I've got a better one. How about I give you the finger, and you give me my phone call.
"One rule to ring them all!" No, wait...
:D
"One Bell to web them all!" Hmm...
"And in the darkness Bell them" No, something's not right...
"Ma' Bell to sue them all!"
THERE!
Chuck Norris doesn't use search engines. All the relevant results simply huddle together in fear.
Bill Clinton: Pimp we can believe in. - The Shirt!!!
But then I would have to switch to Road Runn^[NO CARRIER]