Slashdot Mirror


Pluto Probe Launches

Artem S. Tashkinov writes "The US space agency, Nasa, has successfully launched its New Horizons mission to Pluto. The $700m probe will gather information on Pluto and its moons before - it is hoped - pressing on to explore other objects in the outer Solar System. Pluto is the only remaining planet that has never been visited by a spacecraft."

20 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In 2015 we should get some pretty interesting data back.

    1. Re:Cool by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am very disappointed with our President for allowing this project (and many others) to be funded. Wasting billions of tax-payers' dollars on atheist scientists' toys that could be spent on community development is an affront to the faith-based policy agenda that has seen our nation move from strength to strength in these difficult times. If we do not stand up to the constant attacks by left-wing scientists with their heretic world-views our very status as a Christian nation is in real threat. I for one am tired of being persecuted for my beliefs.

    2. Re:Cool by macadamia_harold · · Score: 3, Funny

      In 2015 we should get some pretty interesting data back.

      I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

    3. Re:Cool by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Funny

      AH... what they didn't tell you is that the payload contains a copy of both the Ten Commandments and the King George Bible... which will be dropped on Pluto to the dismay of Clyde Tombaugh who thought his ashes were going to find a good secular resting place on the farthest planet from Earth we can get to...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  2. Photo by Eightyford · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a closeup of the latest photo of pluto taken by Hubble.

    1. Re:Photo by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, looks like Hubble is out of focus again.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  3. Re:Fastest too.. by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 3, Funny

    But slower than Chuck Norris.

    Anyway, that's quite some speed it has. Major improvement. Now we just have to hope nothing goes wrong.

  4. Re:This happened around 2 PM EST by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    having dated a Wiccan years ago.

    Whew. Talk about your eccentric orbits! Glad to have you back.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Obligatory "Remember Firefly" post by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The outer planet?

    Reavers!!!

  6. Re:The website that changed policy by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everybody knows Archimedes Plutonium was the real driving force behind the Pluto mission. It will be the final vindication of his Plutonium Totality Theory, by proving his prediction that Pluto is entirely made of Plutonium.

  7. Re:This happened around 2 PM EST by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pfft, yeah, I guess.. I mean, if you consider an average speed of 26,539MPH to be fast. If going from LA to New York in 6 minutes is your idea of fast, then sure, this thing is just whizzing along.

  8. 10 years later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
  9. Re:The website that changed policy by gizmonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    And porn. Don't forget the porn.

    --
    WWJD?
    JWRTFM!
  10. Re:The website that changed policy by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the internet I try to hold onto. People coming together for a common good. I'd love to see more of that. You're new here, aren't you?

  11. Re:Fastest too.. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "'The New Horizons spacecraft will be the fastest ever launched, more than 10 times faster than a speeding bullet.' That is faster then superman.

    Not necessarily. Superman is faster than a speeding bullet -- that doesn't mean he is NOT eleven times[1] faster than a speeding bullet.

    Besides, how long did it take Him to fly around Earth a few times to reverse time by using his massive amount of drag to reverse the spin of Earth? I bet the same speed would get him past the moon in less than 9 hours. Then again, that movie sucked. Never mind.

    [1] insert your own Spinal Tap joke here.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. my bet: by dartarrow · · Score: 2, Funny

    in 2015 when the craft reaches pluto it will be greeted by Japanese rocket launched 2010 carrying korean 8-legged-roboAssTroNuts


    p.s. How long before we get to the Pegasus Galaxy? I need to ask Thor and the Ori about Intelligent Design. I'm pretty sure they were involved somehow

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  13. Re:Relativity ;) by lazybratsche · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, *duh*. In space, there's no air molecules to slow down the sound! That's why the sound effects of that battle halfway around the planet always arrive in sync with what you see. Mach one = C. Or something. So the space shuttle goes 25c and consequently back in time. I should stop trying to wrap my head around this mystery before something breaks.

  14. Re:Relativity ;) by maynard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that why no one can hear you scream?

  15. Nah. Stopping would have been easy at any speed. by jd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, being able to walk around afterwards kind-of puts a limit on things, as did the "returning safely", but just the stopping would have been a piece of cake.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. Sadly indicative of NASA's decline... by john-da-luthrun · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the good old days, before "faster-better-cheaper", NASA would have made sure it built three or four redundant back-up planets into the mission plan, in case the original planet got downgraded en route.