Slashdot Mirror


UCLA Students Urged to Expose 'Radical' Professors

rts008 writes to tell us Reuters is reporting that a conservative alumni group is working hard to expose 'radical professors'. The group is a creation of 2003 UCLA graduate, Andrew Jones, who stated that he runs the organization on his own with $22,000 in private donations. From the article: "Jones told Reuters he is out to 'restore an atmosphere of respectful political discourse on campus' and says his efforts are aimed at academics who proselytize students from either side of the ideological spectrum, conservative or liberal. 'We are concerned solely with indoctrination, one-sided presentation of ideological controversies and unprofessional classroom behavior,' Jones said on his Web site." The tactics used by Jones and his group are raising quite a few questions, however, offering to pay students for recordings or teaching materials that could provide 'evidence' against professors in question.

5 of 1,229 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bias in academia by killjoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Arguing that all the smart people are liberals is amazing ignorant."

    Statistically speaking people with collage educations are more likely to be liberals. Oddly enough the people with passports tend to overwhelmingly liberals. Furthermore a study showed that on average the viewers of the John Stewart show (liberal) were better educated and made more money then the viewers of Bill Oreilly.

    I am afraid the facts disagree with you. Sure there are educated conservatives but the majority of people with degrees as liberals by a long shot.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  2. Re:Hey, the right to speek freely... by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Out of curiosity, in what year were you born?

    Indeed, I have to admit, I was born in the 1930s, so I was quite young when fascism became a serious matter. However, I do know many veterans who fought in World War II, and were well aware of the political landscape at that time.

    One thing you'll notice when you talk to almost any of them is that they're scared today. They think back to what they fought against, and they see it present yet again. Except this time it is being done in their name, by their countries. The proof is all around. It's obvious to them, and even to somebody such as myself, who has vague memories of such times.

    Of course, somebody born in the last 30 or 40 years might not be able to notice such things by themselves, as they grew up within the confined of the system and thus cannot see beyond it.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  3. Re:Read my ... by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, not exactly right on the money. Shamefully close. I'll try to be as neutral as I can, although some of these are subjective, and my political leanings influence them.

    Disclosure: I am a conservative. I am not a republican. I have never voted republican in a national election. I've also never voted democrat. I think national politics in America is an institution rotten to its core.

    1. Powerful and continuing nationalism - check, but this isn't new to Bush.
    2. Disdain for the recognition of human rights - check, and this one makes me sad. Even if the administration was angelic in every other respect, this is an unforgivable fault.
    3. Identifying enemies or scapegoats as a unifying cause - check, but the enemy is real. That's a matter of convenience, I know, but something still has to be done.
    4. Supremacy of the military - check, I'll give this one, but it's sort of overstated in the flash. As a conservative, I recognize the need for a military.
    5. Rampant sexism - no, not really, although it seems unneeded for fascism anyway.
    6. Controlled mass media - again, no. Sure, some media outlets lean the same way as the president. Others don't. It's a pretty good mix, in my opinion. On the other hand, I'm not like most people, which is to say I don't suffer from the disease of wanting to have my opinions parroted back at me. Overall, the media sells what people want to buy.
    7. Obsession with national security - check, but once again, the enemy is real.
    8. Religion and government are intertwined - no, not really. As a devout atheist, I'd probably notice. The President spouting personal religious beliefs does not a religious government make.
    9. Corporate power is protected - half a check. Corporate power is certainly huge, but that's the nature of corporations. I personally don't believe in beating businesspeople down just for doing business in any case, but that won't be a popular sentiment on a site that is so anti-people-making-money-for-themselves.
    10. Labor power is suppressed - half a check. There's not a tremendous amount of supression going on, and the power labor is losing is more related to globalization than anything else. Interestingly, the fix requires more of number 1.
    11. Disdain for intellectuals and the arts - I don't see this one. I think it's elitism, frankly. Disdain for the Dixie Chicks was shown, and that's fine by me, but I've thought they sucked from their inception. (I'm being facetious with my example.)
    12. Obsession with crime and punishment - half a check. Outside of the national security angle, this one is surprisingly lowkey for a Republican administration. In the flash it is said that the "police are given almost limitless powers to enforce the laws." A case could be made, particularly regarding the USA PATRIOT act, but right now, it's just not entirely true. Right on the ledge, though. A short consolidation of federal and state powers would do this trick quickly.
    13. Rampant cronyism and corruption - check. That's called politics. It exists everywhere there are politicians. That's not an excuse, of course.
    14. Fraudulent elections - nope. Sorry, there's never been anything produced that points a clear finger toward election fraud. This drum will be beat for a long time, I'm sure, but there's just no evidence.


    So I see 7.5 out of 14. We'll call it 8. Terrible score overall, but it doesn't add up to fascism to me. I'm pretty sure we'd see a lot more suppression of dissent if we lived under a fascist regime.
    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  4. Suggestion: Pepperdine. Or Biola. by MsGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those who can't hack the left-of-center politics at UCLA, I have two local suggestions for alternatives:

    Alternative 1, for those wanting to study Political Science, Business or Law: Pepperdine, Malibu, CA.

    Yes, you can study at a law school where Kenneth Starr is the Dean! And that's just the beginning. Pepperdine was founded by Southern Baptists and is almost thoroughly Conservative-run. Only the school of Education and Psychology (why am I not surprised?) harbors liberal rebel scum. If you avoid that bastion of hippie-dom, you are good to go. And besides, it's in Malibu. Righteous waves and babes in bikinis. You know you want it.

    Alternative 2 for those wanting to get their Divinity degree: Biola, La Mirada, southern Los Angeles County, CA.

    The Bible Institute Of Los Angeles has been known as the province of fire-breathing Fundamentalist Christians for about a century. You don't have to go to the Southeast and the Bible Belt to get that old time religious education, it's right there. Perhaps the only place more hardcore than Biola is Bob Jones University.

    Both of these places are realistic alternatives for those who would rather not go to UCLA. I guarantee you, you will not have your precious Right-Wing political preferences challenged either place. You might have to pay more, because both of these are private institutions, but that wonderful feeling of not having to listen to grubby liberal eggheads spouting off with opinions that Rush and O'Reilly and Hannity tell you are "just plain wrong" is priceless, right? Right?

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  5. Right to speak freely by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In a couple quick looks over the comments I see alot of hand-wringing and talking about how this is a slippery slope to Nazism and oh nos about the Conservatives beating up the Liberals and how the profs need to be able to speak freely.

    What about the student's rights to an education and to speak freely?

    I'm a Graduate Student in History, I focus on the Military History in the Middle East since 1918 and the American West from 1865 to the close of the Frontier in 1900. I've been graded down for writing about the Israeli Defense Forces vs. Egypt and Syria rather than focusing on the Palestinian "cause" in the Arab-Israeli Wars. I've been told flat out lies about the Conquistadors and when I tried to cite facts have been shouted down for it.

    I'm not paticularly Conversative and I don't spout off in classes but I know that I can't take any class I want from any professor I want because there are some who do grade you down for your outlook on History and the subject matter you write about. In Israeli-Palestinian classes as I said before, I've been docked for looking at Arab-Israeli conflicts and history rather than the "occupation and resistance" even after clearing the subject with the Professors. I've had papers returned with a lower grade with the justifaction of "you pay for your focus". I've had TAs stop speaking to me and refusing to let me ask questions because I told them I lived in Israel, was attacked by Hezbollah and have more of an Israeli viewpoint to the Golan Heights.

    Today, in Public Universities I don't see where a Student, at least in History, can study what they want and look at a subject from all sides because many professors either won't let you or punish you for it.